Skip to content

The Effects of Cannabinoid on Patients With Non-GERD Related Non Cardiac Chest Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01598207
Enrollment
13
Registered
2012-05-15
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2017-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chest Pain

Brief summary

Background: Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) affects 200,000 new cases annually in USA. It is associated with poor quality of life and high health care expenditure of 8 Billion Dollars a year. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD), esophageal motility disorders, and psychological issues may cause NCCP. The mechanism(s) for pain continue to be explored and include central and peripheral hypersensitivity, and mechanophysical abnormalities. Treatment of NCCP has focused on relieving visceral hypersensitivity through pain modulators, such as tricyclics, trazodone, or adenosine receptor antagonist, theophylline. Typically, only 40-50 % respond and clearly there is a large unmet therapeutic need. Cannabis is felt to be beneficial for vomiting, diarrhea and intestinal pain. The main component of Cannabis acts through specific receptors, that are located primarily on central and peripheral neurons (including the enteric nervous system) and myenteric plexus where they modulate neurotransmitter release. Activation of these receptors reduces excitatory enteric transmission and may improve esophageal hyperreactivity and hypersensitivity, the hallmarks of NCCP. STUDY PROTOCOL: The investigators will randomize 40 subjects with non-cardiac, non-reflux chest pain to receive dronabinol (5 mg Bid), or placebo for 4 weeks. Chest pain symptoms and esophageal sensorimotor properties will be assessed at baseline and at 4 weeks using symptom diary and impedance planimetry. The primary outcome measure will be the frequency of chest pain episodes. Secondary outcome measures include improvement in esophageal sensory thresholds, reduced reactive contractions, frequency, amplitude, area under the curve, and global improvement of symptoms. HYPOTHESIS: Cannabinoids decrease esophageal hypersensitivity and ameliorate chest pain in NCCP patients, when compared to placebo. AIM: To perform a randomized double blind study to investigate the effects of Dronabinol, a CB1 and CB2 agonist, in the treatment of patients with NCCP and examine its mechanism of action.

Interventions

5mg BID, orally for 1 month

DRUGPlacebo

5mg BID, orally for 1 month

Sponsors

Yehudith Assouline-Dayan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female * Ages 18-75 years * Non-GERD related Non cardiac chest pain (Evaluated previously with an EGD, Esophageal manometry, and 24 Hour ambulatory pH study) * At least one episode of chest pain a week in the past month * Previous negative cardiac evaluation (EKG ± Non invasive stress test ± Coronary angiogram)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects requiring narcotics or other pain medications * Subjects with known esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus or peptic stricture on endoscopy * Subjects with previous upper gastrointestinal surgery * Pregnancy * Subjects with Diabetes, neuromuscular disorders, or other severe co-morbidities (Cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, hematologic, endocrine, neurologic, and psychiatric) * Subjects with upper airway symptoms (such as hoarseness, wheezing or laryngospasm) * Medications such as baclofen, H2 blockers, PPI, sucralfate and prokinetics. * Known history of substance abuse * Nursing mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline and 1 monthNumber of people still experiencing the same amount of chest pain during treatment than previously without

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline and 1 monthIntensity (0(none) - 3(severe)) at baseline vs 1 month for chest pain episodes; higher represents worse outcome; multiple chest pain totals are averaged
Sensory Thresholds for First SensationBaseline and 1 monthThis is determined by the Esophageal Balloon Distension Test; range 0-65 mmHg
Frequency of Chest Pain in Treatment Group vs Baseline1 monthTotal (intensity (0(none) - 3(severe) + duration (0(none) - 3(longer than 30 mins)) at end of 1 month treatment; higher represents worse outcome; the total score ranges from 0 to 6 and is the sum of the intensity and duration
Sensory Thresholds for DiscomfortBaseline and 1 monthWhen participants felt pain at earliest pressure; range 0-65 mmHg
Sensory Thresholds for PainBaseline and 1 monthWhen highest amount of pain was felt; range is 0-65 mmHg
Duration of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline vs 1 month0 - is none and 3 is longer than 30 mins; higher values is worst outcome; chest pain totals are averaged

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Marinol
Marinol: 5mg BID, orally for 1 month
7
Placebo
Placebo: 5mg BID, orally for 1 month
6
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMarinolPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants6 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 71 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Frequency of Chest Pain Episodes

Number of people still experiencing the same amount of chest pain during treatment than previously without

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MarinolFrequency of Chest Pain Episodes1 participants
PlaceboFrequency of Chest Pain Episodes3 participants
Secondary

Duration of Chest Pain Episodes

0 - is none and 3 is longer than 30 mins; higher values is worst outcome; chest pain totals are averaged

Time frame: Baseline vs 1 month

Population: 1 participant in placebo did not have this information completed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarinolDuration of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
MarinolDuration of Chest Pain Episodes1 Month1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
PlaceboDuration of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
PlaceboDuration of Chest Pain Episodes1 Month1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Frequency of Chest Pain in Treatment Group vs Baseline

Total (intensity (0(none) - 3(severe) + duration (0(none) - 3(longer than 30 mins)) at end of 1 month treatment; higher represents worse outcome; the total score ranges from 0 to 6 and is the sum of the intensity and duration

Time frame: 1 month

Population: 1 participant in placebo did not have this information completed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarinolFrequency of Chest Pain in Treatment Group vs Baseline1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
PlaceboFrequency of Chest Pain in Treatment Group vs Baseline1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Secondary

Intensity of Chest Pain Episodes

Intensity (0(none) - 3(severe)) at baseline vs 1 month for chest pain episodes; higher represents worse outcome; multiple chest pain totals are averaged

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

Population: 1 participant in placebo did not have this information completed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarinolIntensity of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
MarinolIntensity of Chest Pain Episodes1 Month0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
PlaceboIntensity of Chest Pain EpisodesBaseline0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
PlaceboIntensity of Chest Pain Episodes1 Month0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Secondary

Sensory Thresholds for Discomfort

When participants felt pain at earliest pressure; range 0-65 mmHg

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

Population: 1 participant in marinol and 1 participant in placebo did not have this information completed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarinolSensory Thresholds for DiscomfortBaseline6 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.48
MarinolSensory Thresholds for Discomfort1 Month8 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.04
PlaceboSensory Thresholds for DiscomfortBaseline5 mmHgStandard Deviation 5
PlaceboSensory Thresholds for Discomfort1 Month2 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.47
Secondary

Sensory Thresholds for First Sensation

This is determined by the Esophageal Balloon Distension Test; range 0-65 mmHg

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarinolSensory Thresholds for First Sensation2 mmHgStandard Deviation 0.125
PlaceboSensory Thresholds for First Sensation2.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 0.103
Secondary

Sensory Thresholds for Pain

When highest amount of pain was felt; range is 0-65 mmHg

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

Population: 1 participant in marinol and 1 participant in placebo did not have this information completed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarinolSensory Thresholds for PainBaseline42 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.81
MarinolSensory Thresholds for Pain1 Month47 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.8
PlaceboSensory Thresholds for PainBaseline53 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.75
PlaceboSensory Thresholds for Pain1 Month51 mmHgStandard Deviation 15.17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026