Skip to content

Veterans Service Organizations and My HealtheVet (MHV)

Working With Veterans Organizations to Encourage Use of My HealtheVet

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01597843
Enrollment
282
Registered
2012-05-14
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2015-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension

Keywords

education, self care, peer group, Computers, Attitude to computers

Brief summary

This project will design, deliver, and evaluate a peer support intervention that will help veterans become familiar with and register for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) My HealtheVet (MHV). It will lay the groundwork for 2 types of future projects. First, the investigators will develop materials that can be used in other settings to increase registration, authentication, and meaningful use of MHV. Second, it will allow us to develop and study interventions that use informed, peer-supported Internet use to improve health behaviors and outcomes among veterans.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Despite the promise of electronic health resources, there is evidence that they have not led to the improved self management that many envisioned. There is evidence for this from a variety of sources, including the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Although there is appropriate attention to improving the functionality and ease of use of the system, a key barrier is patient acceptance and familiarity. Peer support, particularly in group settings, can improve health-related behaviors. Such approaches may increase and improve MHV use. OBJECTIVES: Our goal in the present project is to develop and test a peer-based mechanism to increase MHV use by member of veterans service organizations (VSO) such as the American Legion. The investigators will address 3 specific aims: 1. To demonstrate that trained members of VSO can provide basic MHV education and support within their VSO unit using mobile computers. 2. To demonstrate that this intervention increases MHV registration, in person authentication (IPA), and reported use of MHV among veteran post members. 3. To create clear, concise, and portable resources that will make it possible to replicate this process in other VSO units or other community settings. METHODS: This implementation study is a quasi-randomized intervention with delayed controls. Working with the leadership of selected veterans groups, the investigators will identify 12 posts that have the appropriate resources and interests to serve as pilot posts for the present project. The investigators will train 2 peer mentors (super-users or SU) from 4 of these posts using adaptations of the peer training approach the investigators used for a previous project. The investigators will work with the SU to install computers with wireless broadband Internet access at their posts. The investigators will load the computers with software that documents unique sessions, sites visited, and amount of time at each site. The investigators will help the SU provide lessons regarding MHV use to his/her fellow post members at 4 monthly post meetings. After 4 months, the investigators will move the computers to the next 4 posts and repeat the intervention. Finally, the investigators will move the computers to the last 4 posts, providing remote support and our training materials to the SU at those posts. The investigators will use computer tracking data, surveys, focus groups, and interviews to assess the impact of the program. The investigators will test changes in registration, IPA, and use with before and after surveys. Our analysis will adjust for clustering within posts. The investigators will transcribe our focus groups and interviews verbatim and analyze them using a case study approach.

Interventions

OTHEREducation

Series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV.

Sponsors

The American Legion Department of Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Two steps, first a post is enrolled, then a member participates. Post eligible if: * The post leadership agrees that the post will support participation. * Two or more members of the post agree to serve as MHV super-users. * There is an identifiable location within the post for the computer. Member eligible if: * Member of post * Attends the meeting at which the survey is administered

Exclusion criteria

* Does not consent to survey * Does not attend meeting where survey administered

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Registration for MHVBaseline; After Group 1 Intervention; After Group 2 InterventionMeasured by response to question: Have you ever used My HealtheVet online?

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We recruited 12 posts at the outset of the study, with the help of the Legion's state leadership. We invited all post members to complete surveys at times 0, 5 months and 10 months. The surveys were distributed by post leadership at a post meeting. We did not obtain informed consent; we obtained no personal identifiers but we obtained post.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
First Educational Intervention Group
Group that receives intervention first. The intervention is a series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV. Education: Series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV.
79
Second Intervention Group
The group that receives the intervention second. The intervention is the same as for the first group. Education: Series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV.
122
Education After Data Collection Complete
This group received a similar intervention, but after all quantitative data collection complete.
81
Total282

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSecond Intervention GroupEducation After Data Collection CompleteFirst Educational Intervention GroupTotal
Age, Continuous65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
66.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
69.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Proportion at Educational level
College or technical degree
0.479 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
0.233 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.423
0.241 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.428
0.315 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.465
Proportion at Educational level
High school or GED
0.438 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
0.674 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.469
0.617 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
0.580 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.494
Proportion at Educational level
Less than high school
0.030 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17
0.057 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.23
0.068 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
0.052 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22
Proportion at Educational level
Missing
0.053 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.224
0.036 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.186
0.074 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.262
0.053 Proportion of participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.224
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
122 Participants81 Participants79 Participants282 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Registration for MHV

Measured by response to question: Have you ever used My HealtheVet online?

Time frame: Baseline; After Group 1 Intervention; After Group 2 Intervention

Population: Respondents to first round survey

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Education in First RoundRegistration for MHVPost first round survey25.0 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Education in First RoundRegistration for MHVBaseline survey6.7 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Education in First RoundRegistration for MHVPost second round survey33.9 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Control First Round; Education in Second RoundRegistration for MHVPost first round survey7.1 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Control First Round; Education in Second RoundRegistration for MHVBaseline survey12.7 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Control First Round; Education in Second RoundRegistration for MHVPost second round survey25.0 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Control First Round; Control Second Round; InterventionRegistration for MHVBaseline survey11.9 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Control First Round; Control Second Round; InterventionRegistration for MHVPost second round survey13.2 Percentage of respondents who use MHV
Control First Round; Control Second Round; InterventionRegistration for MHVPost first round survey12.1 Percentage of respondents who use MHV

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026