Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
education, self care, peer group, Computers, Attitude to computers
Brief summary
This project will design, deliver, and evaluate a peer support intervention that will help veterans become familiar with and register for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) My HealtheVet (MHV). It will lay the groundwork for 2 types of future projects. First, the investigators will develop materials that can be used in other settings to increase registration, authentication, and meaningful use of MHV. Second, it will allow us to develop and study interventions that use informed, peer-supported Internet use to improve health behaviors and outcomes among veterans.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Despite the promise of electronic health resources, there is evidence that they have not led to the improved self management that many envisioned. There is evidence for this from a variety of sources, including the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Although there is appropriate attention to improving the functionality and ease of use of the system, a key barrier is patient acceptance and familiarity. Peer support, particularly in group settings, can improve health-related behaviors. Such approaches may increase and improve MHV use. OBJECTIVES: Our goal in the present project is to develop and test a peer-based mechanism to increase MHV use by member of veterans service organizations (VSO) such as the American Legion. The investigators will address 3 specific aims: 1. To demonstrate that trained members of VSO can provide basic MHV education and support within their VSO unit using mobile computers. 2. To demonstrate that this intervention increases MHV registration, in person authentication (IPA), and reported use of MHV among veteran post members. 3. To create clear, concise, and portable resources that will make it possible to replicate this process in other VSO units or other community settings. METHODS: This implementation study is a quasi-randomized intervention with delayed controls. Working with the leadership of selected veterans groups, the investigators will identify 12 posts that have the appropriate resources and interests to serve as pilot posts for the present project. The investigators will train 2 peer mentors (super-users or SU) from 4 of these posts using adaptations of the peer training approach the investigators used for a previous project. The investigators will work with the SU to install computers with wireless broadband Internet access at their posts. The investigators will load the computers with software that documents unique sessions, sites visited, and amount of time at each site. The investigators will help the SU provide lessons regarding MHV use to his/her fellow post members at 4 monthly post meetings. After 4 months, the investigators will move the computers to the next 4 posts and repeat the intervention. Finally, the investigators will move the computers to the last 4 posts, providing remote support and our training materials to the SU at those posts. The investigators will use computer tracking data, surveys, focus groups, and interviews to assess the impact of the program. The investigators will test changes in registration, IPA, and use with before and after surveys. Our analysis will adjust for clustering within posts. The investigators will transcribe our focus groups and interviews verbatim and analyze them using a case study approach.
Interventions
Series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Two steps, first a post is enrolled, then a member participates. Post eligible if: * The post leadership agrees that the post will support participation. * Two or more members of the post agree to serve as MHV super-users. * There is an identifiable location within the post for the computer. Member eligible if: * Member of post * Attends the meeting at which the survey is administered
Exclusion criteria
* Does not consent to survey * Does not attend meeting where survey administered
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Registration for MHV | Baseline; After Group 1 Intervention; After Group 2 Intervention | Measured by response to question: Have you ever used My HealtheVet online? |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
We recruited 12 posts at the outset of the study, with the help of the Legion's state leadership. We invited all post members to complete surveys at times 0, 5 months and 10 months. The surveys were distributed by post leadership at a post meeting. We did not obtain informed consent; we obtained no personal identifiers but we obtained post.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| First Educational Intervention Group Group that receives intervention first. The intervention is a series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV.
Education: Series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV. | 79 |
| Second Intervention Group The group that receives the intervention second. The intervention is the same as for the first group.
Education: Series of training sessions, in person and on line, to educate post superusers who will in turn educate post members on the utility and mechanics of use of MHV. | 122 |
| Education After Data Collection Complete This group received a similar intervention, but after all quantitative data collection complete. | 81 |
| Total | 282 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Second Intervention Group | Education After Data Collection Complete | First Educational Intervention Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 65.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 | 66.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 | 69.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 67.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 |
| Proportion at Educational level College or technical degree | 0.479 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 | 0.233 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.423 | 0.241 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.428 | 0.315 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.465 |
| Proportion at Educational level High school or GED | 0.438 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 | 0.674 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.469 | 0.617 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48 | 0.580 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.494 |
| Proportion at Educational level Less than high school | 0.030 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17 | 0.057 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.23 | 0.068 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25 | 0.052 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22 |
| Proportion at Educational level Missing | 0.053 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.224 | 0.036 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.186 | 0.074 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.262 | 0.053 Proportion of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.224 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 122 Participants | 81 Participants | 79 Participants | 282 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Registration for MHV
Measured by response to question: Have you ever used My HealtheVet online?
Time frame: Baseline; After Group 1 Intervention; After Group 2 Intervention
Population: Respondents to first round survey
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education in First Round | Registration for MHV | Post first round survey | 25.0 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Education in First Round | Registration for MHV | Baseline survey | 6.7 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Education in First Round | Registration for MHV | Post second round survey | 33.9 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Control First Round; Education in Second Round | Registration for MHV | Post first round survey | 7.1 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Control First Round; Education in Second Round | Registration for MHV | Baseline survey | 12.7 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Control First Round; Education in Second Round | Registration for MHV | Post second round survey | 25.0 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Control First Round; Control Second Round; Intervention | Registration for MHV | Baseline survey | 11.9 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Control First Round; Control Second Round; Intervention | Registration for MHV | Post second round survey | 13.2 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |
| Control First Round; Control Second Round; Intervention | Registration for MHV | Post first round survey | 12.1 Percentage of respondents who use MHV |