Skip to content

Double Cord Versus Haploidentical (BMT CTN 1101)

A Multi-Center, Phase III, Randomized Trial of RIC and Transplantation of (dUCB) Versus HLA-Haplo Related Bone Marrow for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.(BMT CTN #1101)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01597778
Enrollment
368
Registered
2012-05-14
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2020-09-11
Last updated
2021-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Burkitt's Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

Haplo identical transplant, Cord blood transplant, Reduced intensity conditioning regimen, Lymphoma, Leukemia

Brief summary

Hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT)are one treatment option for people with leukemia or lymphoma. Family members,unrelated donors or banked umbilical cordblood units with similar tissue type can be used for HCT. This study will compare the effectiveness of two new types of bone marrow transplants in people with leukemia or lymphoma: one that uses bone marrow donated from family members with only partially matched bone marrow; and, one that uses two partially matched cord blood units.

Detailed description

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) has allowed older and less clinically fit patients to receive potentially curative treatment with allogeneic HCT for high risk or advanced hematological malignancies. Patients lacking an HLA-matched sibling may receive a graft from a suitably HLA-matched unrelated donor. However, up to a third of patients will not have an HLA-matched sibling or a suitably matched adult unrelated donor (i.e., no more than a mismatch at a single locus). Even when a suitably matched unrelated donor is identified, data from the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) indicate that a median of four months is required to complete searches that result in transplantation; thus, some number of patients succumb to their disease while awaiting identification and evaluation of a suitably matched adult unrelated donor. Single or dual center studies have shown that partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow (haplo-BM) and unrelated double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) are valuable sources of donor cells for RIC HCT, thus extending this treatment modality to patients who lack other donors. In order to study the reproducibility, and thus, the wider applicability of these two alternative donor strategies, The Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) conducted two parallel multicenter prospective Phase II clinical trials. These two studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of related haplo-BM (BMT CTN 0603) and dUCB (BMT CTN 0604) transplantation after RIC. Both of these alternative donor approaches produced early results similar to that reported with unrelated donor, and even HLA-matched sibling, HCT. These data demonstrate not only the efficacy of both of these approaches, but also that both can be safely exported from the single center setting. Both haplo-BM and dUCB grafts can be obtained rapidly for greater than 90% of patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. This study will test the hypothesis that progression free survival at two years after RIC haplo-BM transplantation is similar to the progression free survival after RIC dUCB transplantation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHaploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant

The conditioning regimen consists of: Fludarabine (Flu)30 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2 Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 14.5 mg/kg IV Days -6, -5 Total body irradiation (TBI) 200cGy Day -1 The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of: Cy 50 mg/kg IV Days 3, 4 Tacrolimus (IV or PO) beginning Day 5 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day 5 until Day 35

BIOLOGICALDouble Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant

The preparative regimen consists of: Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4,-3, -2 Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV Day -6 Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy Day -1 for patients who have received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment or an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment or 300 cGy Day -1 for patients who have not received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment and who have not received an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment. The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of: Cyclosporine beginning Day -3 with dose adjusted to maintain a trough level of 200-400 ng/mL. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day -3 until Day 35

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Marrow Donor Program
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18 to 70 years old * Patients must have available both: a)One or more potential related mismatched donors (biologic parent(s) or siblings (full or half) or children). At least low resolution DNA based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 for potential haploidentical sibling donors is required. b)At least two potential umbilical cord blood units identified. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10\^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x 10\^7/kg. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA-A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing) and HLA-DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing). Confirmatory typing is not required for randomization. * Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) that is NOT considered favorable-risk as defined by the presence of at least one of the following: Adverse cytogenetics such as t(9;22), t(1;19), t(4;11), other Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) rearrangements; White blood cell counts of greater than 30,000/mcL (B-ALL) or greater than 100,000/mcL (T-ALL)at diagnosis; Recipient age older than 30 years at diagnosis; Time to CR greater than 4 weeks * Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia (AML) in CR1 that is NOT considered as favorable-risk. Favorable risk is defined as having one of the following: t(8.21) without CKIT mutation, inv(16) without CKIT mutation or t(16;16), normal karyotype with mutated NPM1 and not FLT-ITD, normal karyotype with double mutated CEBPA, Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in first molecular remission at end of consolidation * Acute Leukemias in 2nd or subsequent CR * Biphenotypic/Undifferentiated/Prolymphocytic Leukemias in first or subsequent CR, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in first or subsequent CR * Burkitt's lymphoma: second or subsequent CR * Lymphoma fulfilling the following criteria: Chemotherapy-sensitive (at least stable disease lymphomas that have failed at least 1 prior regimen of multi-agent chemotherapy and are INELIGIBLE for an autologous transplant. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are not eligible regardless of disease status. * Performance status: Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 70%. Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Conditioning: * Patients with Adequate Physical Function as Measured by: a. Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be greater than or equal to 40%, or shortening fraction less than 25%; b. Hepatic: Bilirubin less than or equal to 2.5 mg/dL, except for patients with Gilbert's syndrome or hemolysis. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline Phosphatase less than 5 x upper limit of normal; c. Renal: Serum creatinine within normal range, or if serum creatinine outside normal range, then renal function (measured or estimated creatinine clearance or GFR)greater than 40 mL/min/1.73m\^; d. Pulmonary: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for hemoglobin), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 50% predicted; * Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Patients Assigned to Haploidentical BM Arm: Patients must be HLA typed at high resolution using DNA based typing at the following HLA-loci: HLA-A, -B, -C and DRB1 and have available a related haploidentical BM donor with 2, 3, or 4 HLA-mismatches. A unidirectional mismatch in either the graft versus host or host versus graft direction is considered a mismatch. The donor and recipient must be HLA identical for at least one antigen (using high resolution DNA based typing) at the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1. Fulfillment of this criterion shall be considered sufficient evidence that the donor and recipient share one HLA haplotype, and typing of additional family members is not required. * Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Patients Assigned to Double Umbilical Cord Blood Arm: 1. Patients must have available two UCB units fulfilling the following criteria: 1. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10\^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x10\^7/kg. 2. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA -A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing), and HLA -DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing). 3. Additional graft selection criteria specified in section 2.5 2. Patients must have received at least one cycle of the cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (or regimen of similar intensity) listed in Appendix D within 3 months of enrollment (measured from the start date of chemotherapy) OR have had an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment OR receive 300 cGy as part of the preparative regimen

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with suitably matched related or unrelated donor, as defined per institutional practice. * Recipients of prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are ineligible if disease recurrence occurred less than 6 months from their autologous stem cell transplant. * Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication with evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings). * Prior allogeneic HCT. * Patients with history of primary idiopathic myelofibrosis or any severe marrow fibrosis. * Planned use of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) therapy. * Anti-donor HLA antibodies. Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)Year 2The primary endpoint is PFS at 2 years post-randomization. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events. The time to event is defined as the time interval from randomization to relapse/progression, to death or to last follow-up, whichever comes first. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil RecoveryDay 56Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 500/mm\^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery.
Percentage of Participants With Platelet RecoveryDay 100Platelet recovery is defined by two different metrics as the first day of a sustained platelet count greater than 20,000/mm\^3 or greater than 50,000/mm\^3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. The first day of the sustained platelet count will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.
Participants With Primary Graft FailureDay 56Primary graft failure is defined as less than 5% donor chimerism on all measurements up to and including Day 56.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft FailureYear 2Secondary graft failure is defined as initial donor chimerism ≥ 5% declining to \< 5% on subsequent measurements with time to secondary graft failure beginning at the first day of primary engraftment.
Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)Day 180The cumulative incidences of grade II - IV and III - IV acute aGVHD will be determined.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGHVD)Year 2The cumulative incidence of cGVHD from the time of transplant will be determined. Data were collected directly from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Conference.
Percentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsYear 2Participants' primary diagnosis was categorized into two large groups: leukemia versus lymphoma. Age was dichotomized into two large groups: age \<= 59 versus age \> 59. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for PFS at 2 years post-randomization are provided for each subgroup.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 100, Day 180, Year 1, and Year 2The cumulative incidence of TRM will be estimated, event for this endpoint is death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse/ProgressionYear 1, year 2Incidence of relapse/progression will be estimated using cumulative incidence function, treating death in remission as a competing risk. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. When in doubt, the diagnosis of recurrent or progressive lymphoma should be documented by tissue biopsy. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.
ToxicitiesDay 28, Day 56, Day 180, 1 year, and 2 yearsThey are all Grade ≥ 3 toxicities based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.
Participants With InfectionsUp to 2 yearsAll Grade 2 and 3 infections will be reported. Grade 1 CMV infections through Day 56 will also be reported.
Hospital Admission and Length of StayMonth 6Total Time Alive and Not Hospitalized within 6 Months Post Randomization
Percentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalYear 2Overall survival is defined as the time interval between date of randomization and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up. The time interval between date of transplant and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up are also analyzed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
dUCB
Participants will receive double unrelated cord blood transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Double unrelated cord blood Transplant: The conditioning regimen consists of: * Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2 * Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV Day -6 * Total Body Irradiation (TBI): - 200 cGy Day -1 for patients who have received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the last 3 months or an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment; - 300 cGY Day -1 for patients who have not received cytotoxic chemotherapy within 3 months of enrollment or an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment * Day 0 will be the day of the double UCB transplant The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of: * Cyclosporine beginning Day -3 with dose adjusted to maintain a trough level of 200-400 ng/mL. Tacrolimus (trough level of 5-15 ng/mL) may be substituted for cyclosporine if the patient is intolerant of cyclosporine or per institutional practice. * Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po TID, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day-3 until Day 35 Supportive care includes: \- Filgrastim (G-CSF) 5 mcg/kg/day beginning Day 1 until ANC \>1500/mm3 for 3 consecutive measurements on at least two different days
186
Haplo-BM
Participants will receive haploidentical bone marrow transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant: The conditioning regimen consists of: * Fludarabine (Flu)30 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2 * Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 14.5 mg/kg IV Days -6, -5 * Total body irradiation (TBI) 200cGy Day -1 * Day 0 will be the day of infusion of non-T-cell depleted bone marrow The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of: * Cy 50 mg/kg IV Days 3, 4 * Tacrolimus (IV or PO) beginning Day 5 with dose adjusted to maintain a trough level of 5-15 ng/mL. Cyclosporine (trough level of 200-400 ng/mL) may be substituted for tacrolimus if the patient is intolerant of tacrolimus or per institutional practice. * Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day 5 until Day 35 Supportive care includes: \- Filgrastim (G-CSF) 5 mcg/kg/day beginning Day 5 until ANC \>1500/mm3 for 3 consecutive measurements on at least two different days
182
Total368

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDeath710
Overall StudyProtocol Violation111
Overall StudyTransplanted off protocol23
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotaldUCBHaplo-BM
Age, Continuous
Median (Range)
58.8 years58.2 years59.9 years
CD34+ cell count at infusion0.20 cells x 10^6/kg0.13 cells x 10^6/kg2.87 cells x 10^6/kg
CD3+ cell count at infusion8.05 cells x 10^6/kg5.50 cells x 10^6/kg29.66 cells x 10^6/kg
CMV Status at Transplant
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
CMV Status at Transplant
Negative
144 Participants76 Participants68 Participants
CMV Status at Transplant
Positive
197 Participants98 Participants99 Participants
Cytogenetics for Leukemia
Favorable
37 Participants17 Participants20 Participants
Cytogenetics for Leukemia
Intermediate
117 Participants61 Participants56 Participants
Cytogenetics for Leukemia
Not Available
30 Participants13 Participants17 Participants
Cytogenetics for Leukemia
Poor
88 Participants43 Participants45 Participants
Disease Risk for Leukemia Patients (N=272)
First Complete Remission
216 Participants99 Participants117 Participants
Disease Risk for Leukemia Patients (N=272)
Second Complete Remission
55 Participants35 Participants20 Participants
Disease Risk for Leukemia Patients (N=272)
Third or More
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Disease Risk for Lymphoma Patients (N=96)
Complete Response
34 Participants20 Participants14 Participants
Disease Risk for Lymphoma Patients (N=96)
Follicular or Non-Hodgkin's
12 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Disease Risk for Lymphoma Patients (N=96)
Partial Response
50 Participants25 Participants25 Participants
Disease Risk Index
High
72 Participants35 Participants37 Participants
Disease Risk Index
Intermediate
239 Participants119 Participants120 Participants
Disease Risk Index
Low
37 Participants23 Participants14 Participants
Disease Risk Index
Not Available
20 Participants9 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants22 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
323 Participants164 Participants159 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
HCT-comorbidity index (CI)
0
105 Participants52 Participants53 Participants
HCT-comorbidity index (CI)
1
49 Participants26 Participants23 Participants
HCT-comorbidity index (CI)
2
49 Participants26 Participants23 Participants
HCT-comorbidity index (CI)
>=3
139 Participants71 Participants68 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Cord Blood Unit 1 at Enrollment
4/6
165 Participants83 Participants82 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Cord Blood Unit 1 at Enrollment
5/6
148 Participants73 Participants75 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Cord Blood Unit 1 at Enrollment
6/6
55 Participants30 Participants25 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Cord Blood Unit 2 at Enrollment
4/6
198 Participants99 Participants99 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Cord Blood Unit 2 at Enrollment
5/6
130 Participants66 Participants64 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Cord Blood Unit 2 at Enrollment
6/6
40 Participants21 Participants19 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Haploidentical Donor at Randomization
3/6
85 Participants46 Participants39 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Haploidentical Donor at Randomization
4/6
38 Participants22 Participants16 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Haploidentical Donor at Randomization
4/8
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Haploidentical Donor at Randomization
5/8
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Haploidentical Donor at Randomization
6/8
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
HLA Matching Score for Haploidentical Donor at Randomization
Not Required*
241 Participants116 Participants125 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
<90
130 Participants59 Participants71 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
>=90
237 Participants126 Participants111 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
0
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
1
27 Participants17 Participants10 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
2
18 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
3
22 Participants14 Participants8 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
4
12 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
5
11 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Number of Regimens Prior to Transplant
Unknown
250 Participants124 Participants126 Participants
Post-thaw CD34+ cell count0.20 cells x 10^6/kg0.20 cells x 10^6/kg0.17 cells x 10^6/kg
Post-thaw CD3+ cell count6.97 cells x 10^6/kg6.97 cells x 10^6/kg7.47 cells x 10^6/kg
Post-thaw total nucleated cell count4.32 cells x 10^7/kg4.32 cells x 10^7/kg3.12 cells x 10^7/kg
Pre-cryopreservation CD34+ cell count0.22 cells x 10^6/kg0.23 cells x 10^6/kg0.21 cells x 10^6/kg
Pre-cryopreservation CD3+ cell count7.38 cells x 10^6/kg7.79 cells x 10^6/kg0.00 cells x 10^6/kg
Pre-cryopreservation total nucleated cell count5.15 cells x 10^7/kg5.13 cells x 10^7/kg5.59 cells x 10^7/kg
Primary Diagnosis
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
63 Participants31 Participants32 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia
196 Participants98 Participants98 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Biphenotypic/Undifferentiated/Prolymphocytic Leukemia
6 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
12 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Hodgkin's Lymphoma
18 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Large Cell Lymphoma
40 Participants21 Participants19 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Mantle Cell Lymphoma
11 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Other Lymphoma
15 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Prior Autologous Transplant
No Prior Autologous Transplant
336 Participants170 Participants166 Participants
Prior Autologous Transplant
Prior Autologous Transplant
32 Participants16 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
24 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
61 Participants27 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
271 Participants145 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
165 Participants89 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
203 Participants97 Participants106 Participants
Time from Diagnosis to Transplant233 day283 day219 day
Total nucleated cell count at infusion4.46 cells x 10^7/kg2.95 cells x 10^7/kg26.82 cells x 10^7/kg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
97 / 18674 / 182
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1860 / 182
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1869 / 182

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The primary endpoint is PFS at 2 years post-randomization. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events. The time to event is defined as the time interval from randomization to relapse/progression, to death or to last follow-up, whichever comes first. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: The primary endpoint analysis is performed using the intent-to-treat principle so that all randomized patients are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)35.0 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)41.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: The primary null hypothesis of the study is that there is no difference between the 2 year PFS probabilities for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.409295% CI: [-5.2, 17.4]Z-test to compare the Kaplan-Meier Est.
Comparison: The null hypothesis of the study is that there is no difference between the 2 year PFS probabilities for dUCB vs. haplo-BM after adjustment for age, performance score, and disease type.p-value: 0.0695% CI: [0.99, 1.7]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Hospital Admission and Length of Stay

Total Time Alive and Not Hospitalized within 6 Months Post Randomization

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The randomized participants are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
dUCBHospital Admission and Length of Stay127.1 DaysStandard Deviation 48.3
Haplo-BMHospital Admission and Length of Stay141.2 DaysStandard Deviation 42.5
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the total duration of hospitalization within 6 months post-randomization for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.0003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Participants With Infections

All Grade 2 and 3 infections will be reported. Grade 1 CMV infections through Day 56 will also be reported.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
dUCBParticipants With Infections# Patients with Infections102 Participants
dUCBParticipants With InfectionsGrade 1 CMV through Day 5694 Participants
Haplo-BMParticipants With Infections# Patients with Infections102 Participants
Haplo-BMParticipants With InfectionsGrade 1 CMV through Day 5684 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Primary Graft Failure

Primary graft failure is defined as less than 5% donor chimerism on all measurements up to and including Day 56.

Time frame: Day 56

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
dUCBParticipants With Primary Graft Failure13 Participants
Haplo-BMParticipants With Primary Graft Failure10 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)

The cumulative incidences of grade II - IV and III - IV acute aGVHD will be determined.

Time frame: Day 180

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)grade II - IV34.9 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)grade III - IV8.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)grade II - IV28.1 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)grade III - IV7.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the aGVHD grade II - IV probabilities post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.142Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the aGVHD grade III - IV probabilities post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.604Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGHVD)

The cumulative incidence of cGVHD from the time of transplant will be determined. Data were collected directly from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Conference.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGHVD)22.0 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGHVD)26.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the cGVHD probabilities post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.361Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery

Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 500/mm\^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery.

Time frame: Day 56

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery94.9 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery98.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the neutrophil engraftment post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.046Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time interval between date of randomization and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up. The time interval between date of transplant and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up are also analyzed.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: The randomized or transplanted participants are included in the analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOS post-randomization45.7 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOS post-transplant46.8 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOS post-randomization57.0 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOS post-transplant59.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the OS probabilities at year 2 post-randomization for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.0373Log Rank
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the OS probabilities at year 2 post-transplant for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.0235Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in Subgroups

Participants' primary diagnosis was categorized into two large groups: leukemia versus lymphoma. Age was dichotomized into two large groups: age \<= 59 versus age \> 59. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for PFS at 2 years post-randomization are provided for each subgroup.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: The randomized participants are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Primary Disease of Leukemia34.8 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Primary Disease of Lymphoma35.6 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Age Group <= 59 years37.9 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Age Group > 59 years31.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Age Group > 59 years42.4 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Primary Disease of Leukemia41.7 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Age Group <= 59 years39.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in SubgroupsBy Primary Disease of Lymphoma39.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery

Platelet recovery is defined by two different metrics as the first day of a sustained platelet count greater than 20,000/mm\^3 or greater than 50,000/mm\^3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. The first day of the sustained platelet count will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.

Time frame: Day 100

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Platelet RecoveryPlatelet recovery to 20K86.9 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Platelet RecoveryPlatelet recovery to 50K78.3 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Platelet RecoveryPlatelet recovery to 20K91.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Platelet RecoveryPlatelet recovery to 50K84.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the platelet engraftment to 20k post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.16Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the platelet engraftment to 50k post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.146Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression

Incidence of relapse/progression will be estimated using cumulative incidence function, treating death in remission as a competing risk. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. When in doubt, the diagnosis of recurrent or progressive lymphoma should be documented by tissue biopsy. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.

Time frame: Year 1, year 2

Population: The randomized or transplanted participants are included in the analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression1 Year Post Randomization41.1 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression1 Year Post Transplant38.7 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression2 Year Post Randomization47.1 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression2 Year Post Transplant43.5 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression2 Year Post Transplant45.8 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression1 Year Post Randomization37.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression2 Year Post Randomization48.4 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression1 Year Post Transplant35.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the relapse/progression probabilities post-randomization for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.968Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the relapse/progression probabilities post- transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.907Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure

Secondary graft failure is defined as initial donor chimerism ≥ 5% declining to \< 5% on subsequent measurements with time to secondary graft failure beginning at the first day of primary engraftment.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure2.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure3.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the secondary graft failure probabilities post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.693Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)

The cumulative incidence of TRM will be estimated, event for this endpoint is death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence.

Time frame: Day 100, Day 180, Year 1, and Year 2

Population: The randomized or transplanted participants are included in the analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)2 Year Post Transplant18.6 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 100 Post Randomization5.5 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 100 Post Transplant6.9 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 180 Post Randomization10.4 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 180 Post Transplant13.1 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)1 Year Post Randomization14.8 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)1 Year Post Transplant16.0 percentage of participants
dUCBPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)2 Year Post Randomization17.9 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)2 Year Post Randomization10.5 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)2 Year Post Transplant10.7 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 180 Post Transplant4.8 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 100 Post Randomization3.4 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)1 Year Post Transplant7.9 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 100 Post Transplant3.6 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)1 Year Post Randomization6.7 percentage of participants
Haplo-BMPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)Day 180 Post Randomization4.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the TRM probabilities post-randomization for dUCB vs. haplo-BM.p-value: 0.039Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the TRM probabilities post-transplantation for dUCB vs. haplo-BMp-value: 0.03Gray's test for cumulative Incidence
Secondary

Toxicities

They are all Grade ≥ 3 toxicities based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.

Time frame: Day 28, Day 56, Day 180, 1 year, and 2 years

Population: The transplanted participants are included in the analysis. A total of 26 patients (11 on the dUCB arm and 15 on the Haplo-BM arm) who did not proceed to the study transplant are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Cystitis Noninfective2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Acute Kidney Injury9 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Oral Mucositis2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Cystitis Noninfective1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Acute Kidney Injury4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Chronic Kidney Disease0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Hemorrhage2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Hypotension12 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Cardiac Arrhythmia6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Somnolence2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Capillary Leak Syndrome1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Hypoxia9 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Dyspnea7 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : ALT3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Oral Mucositis3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : AST2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Bilirubin3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Alkaline Phosphatase4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Received Dialysis2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Seizure0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Acute Kidney Injury3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Chronic Kidney Disease2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Hemorrhage2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Hypotension5 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Cardiac Arrhythmia3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Somnolence4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Capillary Leak Syndrome0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Hypoxia6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Dyspnea9 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : ALT7 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : AST5 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Bilirubin3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Alkaline Phosphatase2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Received Dialysis3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Seizure0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Oral Mucositis1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Cystitis Noninfective1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Chronic Kidney Disease1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Hemorrhage3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Hypotension12 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Cardiac Arrhythmia4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Somnolence5 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Capillary Leak Syndrome1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Hypoxia22 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Dyspnea21 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : ALT6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : AST8 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Bilirubin8 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Alkaline Phosphatase4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Received Dialysis2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Seizure0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Oral Mucositis2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Cystitis Noninfective2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Acute Kidney Injury4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Chronic Kidney Disease2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Hemorrhage3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Hypotension3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Cardiac Arrhythmia4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Somnolence3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Capillary Leak Syndrome0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Hypoxia8 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Dyspnea10 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : ALT4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : AST5 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Bilirubin5 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Alkaline Phosphatase6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Received Dialysis1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Seizure0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Oral Mucositis3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Cystitis Noninfective1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Acute Kidney Injury3 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Chronic Kidney Disease1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Hemorrhage2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Hypotension6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Cardiac Arrhythmia0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Somnolence0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Infusion Toxicities19 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Capillary Leak Syndrome0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Hypoxia6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Received Dialysis1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Dyspnea4 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : ALT1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : AST0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Bilirubin1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Alkaline Phosphatase1 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Seizure0 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Infusion Toxicities19 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Oral Mucositis9 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Cystitis Noninfective6 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Acute Kidney Injury22 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Chronic Kidney Disease5 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Hemorrhage12 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Hypotension31 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Cardiac Arrhythmia14 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction8 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Somnolence13 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura14 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Capillary Leak Syndrome2 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Hypoxia41 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Dyspnea38 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: ALT18 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: AST19 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Bilirubin18 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Alkaline Phosphatase14 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Abnormal Liver Symptoms15 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Received Dialysis8 Toxicities
dUCBToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Seizure0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Seizure0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Seizure3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Oral Mucositis2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Chronic Kidney Disease9 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Infusion Toxicities7 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Oral Mucositis0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Oral Mucositis2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Hypoxia34 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Cystitis Noninfective1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Cystitis Noninfective1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Acute Kidney Injury4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Capillary Leak Syndrome0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Chronic Kidney Disease2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Acute Kidney Injury6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Hemorrhage6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Hemorrhage12 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Hypotension10 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Chronic Kidney Disease2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Cardiac Arrhythmia6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Hypoxia7 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Hemorrhage5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Somnolence1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Bilirubin13 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Hypotension9 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Capillary Leak Syndrome0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Hypotension32 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Hypoxia9 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Cardiac Arrhythmia5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Dyspnea0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Dyspnea8 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : ALT6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Dyspnea35 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : AST4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Somnolence5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Bilirubin1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : ALT4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Alkaline Phosphatase1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Cardiac Arrhythmia14 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Received Dialysis1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Capillary Leak Syndrome1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 0-28 : Seizure0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Cystitis Noninfective1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : AST4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Acute Kidney Injury3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Hypoxia10 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Chronic Kidney Disease3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Abnormal Liver Symptoms18 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Hemorrhage4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Dyspnea11 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Hypotension5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Bilirubin3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Cardiac Arrhythmia2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : ALT4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Somnolence1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : AST4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Alkaline Phosphatase3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Capillary Leak Syndrome1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Bilirubin5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Hypoxia5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: ALT19 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Dyspnea6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Alkaline Phosphatase4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : ALT1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : AST1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Bilirubin1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Received Dialysis2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Alkaline Phosphatase0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Received Dialysis4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Somnolence13 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Received Dialysis2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 181-365 : Seizure2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 29-56 : Seizure0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Seizure1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Infusion Toxicities0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Oral Mucositis1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Alkaline Phosphatase12 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Cystitis Noninfective2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Acute Kidney Injury7 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Oral Mucositis1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Chronic Kidney Disease4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Infusion Toxicities7 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Hemorrhage6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Cystitis Noninfective2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Hypotension10 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Cardiac Arrhythmia3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Acute Kidney Injury3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Oral Mucositis6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Somnolence2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Chronic Kidney Disease0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: AST18 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Capillary Leak Syndrome0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Hemorrhage0 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Hypoxia7 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Cystitis Noninfective6 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Dyspnea8 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Hypotension5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : ALT4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Capillary Leak Syndrome2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : AST5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Cardiac Arrhythmia2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Bilirubin3 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Acute Kidney Injury19 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Alkaline Phosphatase4 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction1 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Abnormal Liver Symptoms5 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesOverall Toxicities Reported Day 0-730: Received Dialysis9 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 57-180 : Received Dialysis2 Toxicities
Haplo-BMToxicitiesToxicities Reported at Day 363-730 : Somnolence4 Toxicities

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026