Skip to content

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Lixisenatide Compared to Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Controlled With Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin

An Open-label, Randomized, Three-parallel-group Study on Pharmacodynamic Effects of 8-week QD Treatment With Lixisenatide Compared to Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Controlled With Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01596504
Enrollment
142
Registered
2012-05-11
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2016-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Primary Objective: \- To investigate the effects of repeated subcutaneous doses of lixisenatide 20 μg once daily (QD) as compared to liraglutide 1.2 mg QD or 1.8 mg QD in reducing post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG) assessed as area under the plasma glucose-concentration-time curve (AUC) after a standardized breakfast at the end of a 8-week treatment period in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not adequately controlled with insulin glargine (± metformin). Secondary Objectives: * To assess the effects of lixisenatide 20 μg QD as compared to liraglutide 1.2 QD or 1.8 mg QD after an 8-week treatment period in participants with T2DM not adequately controlled with insulin glargine (± metformin) on: * Post-prandial C-peptide, glucagon and appetite perceptions after a standardized breakfast, * Appetite perceptions after standardized dinner, * Gastric emptying after a standardized labelled test meal, * Fasting plasma glucose, 24-hour plasma glucose profile, * Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), * Insulin glargine dose, * 7-point self monitored plasma glucose (SMPG), * Body weight and waist circumference, * 24-hour heart rate and blood pressure, * To assess lixisenatide and liraglutide safety and tolerability as add on treatment to insulin glargine (± metformin).

Detailed description

Up to 2-week screening period * A run-in period of 12 weeks at maximum including a forced titration with insulin glargine up to 11 weeks and 1 baseline pharmacodynamic assessment week * A 8-week treatment(s) period(s) up to Day 57 * Follow-up: 7 ±2 days after the last treatment day * Total study duration approximately 14 weeks up to 23 weeks

Interventions

DRUGLixisenatide (AVE0010)

Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection self-administered with a pen-like injector (OptiClik®). Route of administration: subcutaneous

DRUGLiraglutide

Pharmaceutical form:solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous

DRUGInsulin Glargine

Doses to be adjusted to maintain a fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) between 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (80 to 100 mg/dL)

DRUGMetformin

If previously taken metformin to be continued at stable dose throughout the study

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Participants with T2DM diagnosed at least 1 year before the screening visit. * Treatment with neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) or insulin glargine for at least 3 months and at a stable dose (±20%) of at least 10 IU/day (for at least 2 months prior to screening) alone or combined with a stable dose of metformin with or without dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor or sulfonylurea. * Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5 and ≤9.5%. * Body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 40 kg/m\^2.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women or breastfeeding women. * Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including, but not limited to, gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment within 6 months prior to the time of screening. * Any previous treatment with lixisenatide or participation in a previous study with lixisenatide (AVE0010), and any previous treatment with liraglutide stopped for safety concern or lack of efficacy. * Allergic reaction to any glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist in the past (eg, exenatide) or to metacresol. * History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery, inflammatory bowel disease. * Personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or a genetic condition that predisposes to MTC. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL) with 1 mg/dL as limit of detection (LOD). Calculation of the AUC was made on Day -3 (baseline) and on Day 56 using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\]) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With 2-Hour Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <7.77 (mmol/L) at Day 56Day 56Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after start of a standardised breakfast.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in PPG Excursion0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. PPG excursion was determined on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in PPG from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.5 hour (prior to standardized breakfast) on Day -3; 0.5 hour (prior to standardized breakfast) on Day 56Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. The value of FPG on Day -3 was the baseline.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Before breakfast, 2 hours post breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours post lunch, before dinner, 2 hours post dinner, and at bedtime on Day -3 (Baseline) and on Day 56Seven-point SMPG (before breakfast, 2 hours post breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours post lunch, before dinner, 2 hours post dinner, and at bedtime) was measured using Freestyle Precision glucometer and average of the 7 measurements was calculated.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected C-Peptide AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day-3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56C-peptide was assessed using the Electro Chemiluminescence Immuno Assay.The range of the method was 0.2 to 25 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) and the LOD was 0.07 ng/mL. Measurement was done on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in C-peptide from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected Glucagon AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56Glucagon was assessed using the radioimmunoassay. The range of the method was 4.7 to 150 picomole per litre (pmol/L). Measurement was done on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in glucagon from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in HbA1cPre-dose (Hour 0) on Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 56HbA1C was assessed using the high performance liquid chromatography method.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as limit of detection (LOD). Calculation of the AUC was made on Day -3 (baseline) and on Day 56 using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\]) to 5 hours after breakfast start (time: 5.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours).
Change From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Half Life (t1/2)0 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 hours on Day -4 (baseline) and on Day 55Gastric emptying was measured using 13C-octanoic acid breath test by isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry.
Change From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Coefficient0 (7:30 clock time, prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 hours on Day -4 (baseline) and on Day 55Gastric emptying was measured using 13C-octanoic acid breath test by isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry. Gastric emptying coefficient was derived from a mathematical formula that describes the gastric emptying rate and gives an overall index of gastric emptying.
Change From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Heart RateEvery 15 minutes from 07:00 clock time to 23:00 clock time (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 clock time to 07:00 clock time (night-time) on Day -2/-1 (Baseline) and Day 57/58The baseline value was the 24-hour mean on Day -2/-1 determined as overall, night and daytime mean. Measurements were made every 15 minutes from 07:00 to 23:00 (daytime) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 to 07:00 (night-time) at baseline and Day 57/58. Measurements were obtained after 10 minutes in the supine resting position.
Change From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood PressureEvery 15 minutes from 07:00 clock time to 23:00 clock time (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 clock time to 07:00 clock time (night-time) on Day -2/ -1 (Baseline) and Day 57/58The baseline value was the 24-hour means on Day -2/-1 determined as overall, night and day-time mean. Measurements were made every 15 minutes from 07:00 to 23:00 (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 to 07:00 (night-time) at baseline and at Day 57/58. Measurements were obtained after 10 minutes in the supine resting position.
Change From Baseline to Day 57 in Body Weight0.5 hours prior to standardized breakfast on Day -1 (Baseline); 0.5 hours prior to study drug administration on Day 57
Change From Baseline to Day 57 in Waist Circumference0.5 hours prior to standardized breakfast on Day -1 (Baseline); 0.5 hours prior to IMP administration on Day 57
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid Breakfast0.5 (8:00 clock time, prior to standardized breakfast), 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3; 0 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56Visual Analogue Scale, 100 mm in length with words anchored at each end, expressing the most positive (100 mm) and the most negative rating (0 mm), was used to assess hunger, satiety, fullness and prospective food consumption. Responses were measured as distance from the left end of the line to the mark. Mean change from baseline was calculated for each parameter separately.
Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Average Daily Insulin Glargine DoseDay -7 (Baseline), Day 56

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 8 centers in Germany between 22 May 2012 to 25 July 2013.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 236 participants were screened and 142 participants were randomized and treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lixisenatide 20 μg
Subcutaneous injection of lixisenatide10 μg QD for 2 weeks followed by 20 μg QD for 6 weeks, on top of insulin glargine with or without metformin.
48
Liraglutide 1.2 mg
Subcutaneous injection of liraglutide 0.6 mg QD for 1 week followed by 1.2 mg QD for 7 weeks, on top of insulin glargine with or without metformin.
47
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
Subcutaneous injection of liraglutide 0.6 mg QD for 1 week followed by 1.2 mg QD for another 1 week and 1.8 mg QD for next 6 weeks, on top of insulin glargine with or without metformin.
47
Total142

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event121
Overall StudyParticipant's Private Reason010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiraglutide 1.2 mgLixisenatide 20 μgLiraglutide 1.8 mgTotal
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Body Mass Index (BMI)30.52 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.01
30.68 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
31.17 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
30.79 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.22
HbA1c at Screening (Day -7)7.19 percentage of haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.53
7.22 percentage of haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
7.33 percentage of haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
7.25 percentage of haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Metformin Use at Screening
No
6 participants5 participants6 participants17 participants
Metformin Use at Screening
Yes
41 participants43 participants41 participants125 participants
Race
Caucasian/White
46 participants48 participants47 participants141 participants
Race
Other
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants15 Participants14 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants33 Participants33 Participants105 Participants
Weight91.62 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.92
90.56 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09
92.92 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.33
91.69 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.07

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 4827 / 4727 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 481 / 470 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL) with 1 mg/dL as limit of detection (LOD). Calculation of the AUC was made on Day -3 (baseline) and on Day 56 using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\]) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours).

Time frame: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Population: Pharmacodynamic (PD) population defined as all randomized participants, who received at least one dose of lixisenatide 20 μg, liraglutide 1.2 mg or liraglutide 1.8 mg, and had both a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment of any primary or secondary PD variables, irrespective of compliance with study protocol and procedures.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours-13.33 h*mmol/LStandard Error 1.11
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours-7.32 h*mmol/LStandard Error 1.12
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours-8.72 h*mmol/LStandard Error 1.16
Comparison: Analysis was performed using linear fixed effects model with treatment groups and stratification factors (HbA1c levels on Day -7 \[\<8% and \>=8%\], use of metformin at screening \[yes or no\]) and the study site) as fixed effects and baseline plasma glucose AUC from 0.5 to 4.5 hours as covariate. To address multiplicity issue and ensure overall 1-sided level of 5%, Hochberg method was used for testing procedure of comparison between lixisenatide vs liraglutide 1.2 mg or 1.8 mg.p-value: <0.0001Linear fixed effects model
Comparison: Analysis was performed using linear mixed effects model with treatment groups and stratification factors (HbA1c levels on Day -7 \[\<8% and \>=8%\], use of metformin at screening \[yes or no\]), and the study site) as fixed effects and baseline plasma glucose AUC from 0.5 to 4.5 hours as covariate. To address multiplicity issue and ensure overall 1-sided level of 5%, Hochberg method was used for testing procedure of comparison between lixisenatide vs liraglutide 1.2 mg or 1.8 mg.p-value: <0.0001Linear fixed effects model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Coefficient

Gastric emptying was measured using 13C-octanoic acid breath test by isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry. Gastric emptying coefficient was derived from a mathematical formula that describes the gastric emptying rate and gives an overall index of gastric emptying.

Time frame: 0 (7:30 clock time, prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 hours on Day -4 (baseline) and on Day 55

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with gastric emptying at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Coefficient-0.33 coefficient (unit-less)Standard Deviation 1.09
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Coefficient-0.34 coefficient (unit-less)Standard Deviation 0.53
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Coefficient-0.28 coefficient (unit-less)Standard Deviation 0.52
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Half Life (t1/2)

Gastric emptying was measured using 13C-octanoic acid breath test by isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry.

Time frame: 0 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 hours on Day -4 (baseline) and on Day 55

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed=participants with gastric emptying assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Half Life (t1/2)453.56 minutes (min)Standard Error 58.24
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Half Life (t1/2)175.31 minutes (min)Standard Error 58.49
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Half Life (t1/2)130.49 minutes (min)Standard Error 60.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)

Seven-point SMPG (before breakfast, 2 hours post breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours post lunch, before dinner, 2 hours post dinner, and at bedtime) was measured using Freestyle Precision glucometer and average of the 7 measurements was calculated.

Time frame: Before breakfast, 2 hours post breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours post lunch, before dinner, 2 hours post dinner, and at bedtime on Day -3 (Baseline) and on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with 7 point SMPG assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)-0.69 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.19
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)-0.76 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.23
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)-1.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose

Time frame: Day -7 (Baseline), Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed=participants with insulin glargine dose assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose-4.7 unitsStandard Deviation 4.8
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose-4.6 unitsStandard Deviation 6.8
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose-4.0 unitsStandard Deviation 6.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected C-Peptide AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours

C-peptide was assessed using the Electro Chemiluminescence Immuno Assay.The range of the method was 0.2 to 25 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) and the LOD was 0.07 ng/mL. Measurement was done on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in C-peptide from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.

Time frame: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day-3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with C-peptide assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected C-Peptide AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours-1.16 h*nmol/LStandard Error 0.37
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected C-Peptide AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours1.23 h*nmol/LStandard Error 0.37
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected C-Peptide AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours0.88 h*nmol/LStandard Error 0.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected Glucagon AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours

Glucagon was assessed using the radioimmunoassay. The range of the method was 4.7 to 150 picomole per litre (pmol/L). Measurement was done on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in glucagon from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.

Time frame: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with glucagon assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected Glucagon AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours-16.56 h*ng/LStandard Error 19.43
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected Glucagon AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours11.58 h*ng/LStandard Error 19.86
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected Glucagon AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours5.6 h*ng/LStandard Error 20.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. The value of FPG on Day -3 was the baseline.

Time frame: 0.5 hour (prior to standardized breakfast) on Day -3; 0.5 hour (prior to standardized breakfast) on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with plasma glucose assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.1 mmol/LStandard Error 0.22
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.12 mmol/LStandard Error 0.22
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in HbA1c

HbA1C was assessed using the high performance liquid chromatography method.

Time frame: Pre-dose (Hour 0) on Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 56

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with HbA1c assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in HbA1c-0.58 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.06
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in HbA1c-0.66 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.06
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in HbA1c-0.74 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as limit of detection (LOD). Calculation of the AUC was made on Day -3 (baseline) and on Day 56 using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\]) to 5 hours after breakfast start (time: 5.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours).

Time frame: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with plasma glucose assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours-13.82 h*mmol/LStandard Error 1.19
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours-9.09 h*mmol/LStandard Error 1.21
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours-10.33 h*mmol/LStandard Error 1.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in PPG Excursion

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. PPG excursion was determined on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in PPG from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.

Time frame: 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with plasma glucose assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in PPG Excursion-3.26 mmol/LStandard Error 0.4
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in PPG Excursion-1.79 mmol/LStandard Error 0.4
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in PPG Excursion-2.5 mmol/LStandard Error 0.42
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid Breakfast

Visual Analogue Scale, 100 mm in length with words anchored at each end, expressing the most positive (100 mm) and the most negative rating (0 mm), was used to assess hunger, satiety, fullness and prospective food consumption. Responses were measured as distance from the left end of the line to the mark. Mean change from baseline was calculated for each parameter separately.

Time frame: 0.5 (8:00 clock time, prior to standardized breakfast), 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3; 0 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed=participants with appetite perception assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow hungry do you feel?-3.7 mmStandard Deviation 16.4
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow satisfied do you feel?4.5 mmStandard Deviation 15.8
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow full do you feel?4.9 mmStandard Deviation 17
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow much do you think you can eat?-6.4 mmStandard Deviation 16.1
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow much do you think you can eat?-4.5 mmStandard Deviation 15.7
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow hungry do you feel?-3.1 mmStandard Deviation 16.8
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow full do you feel?9.3 mmStandard Deviation 15.6
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow satisfied do you feel?8.9 mmStandard Deviation 13.2
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow much do you think you can eat?-7.2 mmStandard Deviation 12
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow satisfied do you feel?3.6 mmStandard Deviation 11
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow full do you feel?6.4 mmStandard Deviation 13.8
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid BreakfastHow hungry do you feel?-1.0 mmStandard Deviation 14.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Heart Rate

The baseline value was the 24-hour mean on Day -2/-1 determined as overall, night and daytime mean. Measurements were made every 15 minutes from 07:00 to 23:00 (daytime) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 to 07:00 (night-time) at baseline and Day 57/58. Measurements were obtained after 10 minutes in the supine resting position.

Time frame: Every 15 minutes from 07:00 clock time to 23:00 clock time (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 clock time to 07:00 clock time (night-time) on Day -2/-1 (Baseline) and Day 57/58

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with heart rate assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Heart Rate3.34 beats per minuteStandard Error 1.33
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Heart Rate9.33 beats per minuteStandard Error 1.24
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Heart Rate9.17 beats per minuteStandard Error 1.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure

The baseline value was the 24-hour means on Day -2/-1 determined as overall, night and day-time mean. Measurements were made every 15 minutes from 07:00 to 23:00 (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 to 07:00 (night-time) at baseline and at Day 57/58. Measurements were obtained after 10 minutes in the supine resting position.

Time frame: Every 15 minutes from 07:00 clock time to 23:00 clock time (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 clock time to 07:00 clock time (night-time) on Day -2/ -1 (Baseline) and Day 57/58

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with blood pressure assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure0.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.4
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure0.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.1
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure-0.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.1
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure2.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.7
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure-2.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure1.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 57 in Body Weight

Time frame: 0.5 hours prior to standardized breakfast on Day -1 (Baseline); 0.5 hours prior to study drug administration on Day 57

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with body weight assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 57 in Body Weight-1.61 kgStandard Error 0.47
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57 in Body Weight-1.78 kgStandard Error 0.48
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57 in Body Weight-2.42 kgStandard Error 0.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Day 57 in Waist Circumference

Time frame: 0.5 hours prior to standardized breakfast on Day -1 (Baseline); 0.5 hours prior to IMP administration on Day 57

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with waist circumference assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lixisenatide 20 μgChange From Baseline to Day 57 in Waist Circumference-1.40 cmStandard Deviation 4.66
Liraglutide 1.2 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57 in Waist Circumference-1.93 cmStandard Deviation 3.59
Liraglutide 1.8 mgChange From Baseline to Day 57 in Waist Circumference-2.12 cmStandard Deviation 4.95
Secondary

Number of Participants With 2-Hour Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <7.77 (mmol/L) at Day 56

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after start of a standardised breakfast.

Time frame: Day 56

Population: PD population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with plasma glucose assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lixisenatide 20 μgNumber of Participants With 2-Hour Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <7.77 (mmol/L) at Day 5635 participants
Liraglutide 1.2 mgNumber of Participants With 2-Hour Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <7.77 (mmol/L) at Day 5613 participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mgNumber of Participants With 2-Hour Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <7.77 (mmol/L) at Day 5611 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026