Skip to content

Telbivudine Versus Entecavir in Reducing Serum HBsAg Levels in Patients With HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B

A Randomized, Open-label Trial Comparing Telbivudine vs, Entecavir in Reducing Serum HBsAg Levels in Patients With HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B Who Have Achieved Serum HBV DNA Undetectability by Preceding Entecavir Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01595685
Acronym
TERESA
Enrollment
98
Registered
2012-05-10
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Viral Hepatitis B Without Delta-agent

Keywords

HBeAg-positive

Brief summary

The goal of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is complete and permanent eradication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from patient's body, which is best represented by serum HBsAg loss accompanied by undetectable serum HBV DNA level. While the most recently approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) have marked antiviral potency and can induce HBV DNA undetectability in the majority of patients through prolonged treatment, NA need to be given long term, almost indefinitely, in most cases because they suppress HBV DNA only during therapy. For example, even after HBeAg-loss by a potent NA, suppression of serum HBV DNA to undetectable level is sustained only in about 23%-37% at 24 weeks off treatment. Thus, continuous therapy with NA until HBsAg clearance remains necessary in a majority of cases. The recent availability of commercial quantitative assays of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has enabled quantitative HBsAg to be used as a biomarker for prognosis and treatment response in CHB. It has been suggested that HBsAg decline during lamivudine or entecavir therapy is slower and less pronounced compared to interferon treatment, despite a higher effect on HBV DNA suppression. Based on HBsAg kinetics, it has been estimated that the predicted median time to HBsAg loss in patients treated with lamivudine or entecavir is more than 30 years. Thus, treatment that can induce rapid decline of HBsAg would have clear advantage in reducing the treatment duration required to achieve HBsAg-loss. Interestingly, in a recent preliminary study, 24-weeks of treatment with telbivudine has induced HBsAg decline as comparable to pegylated interferon treatment. Although there has been no head-to-head trial comparing NAs in inducing HBsAg decline, previous studies consistently suggested that the decline of HBsAg is greater during telbivudine treatment compared with lamivudine or entecavir. Thus, in this clinical trial, the investigators will investigate whether telbivudine is more effective in inducing HBsAg decline compared with entecavir in HBeAg-positive CHB patients who have achieved undetectable serum HBV DNA by preceding entecavir treatment.

Detailed description

A single-center randomized active-controlled open-label superiority trial * Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive telbivudine (600 mg/day) or ongoing entecavir (0.5 mg/day) for 48 weeks. * Eligible patients will be randomized using blocks of permuted treatment assignments after stratification by HBsAg level (1,000 IU/mL-5,000 IU/mL and ≥5,000 IU/mL IU/mL) and by entecavir treatment duration (1 year-2 year, ≥2 year). * Because over 98% of Korean patients with CHB have HBV genotype C,9 HBV genotype will not determined or be regarded as a stratification factor. * There will be no interruption in entecavir therapy before randomization. * Patients' treatment information will be retrospectively collected during entecavir treatment phase as well (DNA change, HBeAg status, HBsAg titre, ALT, and treatment duration. etc) * Patients will be screened within 4 weeks before randomization to determine study eligibility.

Interventions

DRUGTelbivudine

Telbivudine 600 mg Daily Oral

DRUGEntecavir

Entecavir 0.5 mg Daily Oral

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All of below * HBsAg titer \> 1,000 IU/mL * HBeAg positive at study entry and at the baseline of ETV treatment * HBV DNA undetectable (\<15 IU/mL) at least 2 occasions of more than 3 months apart * Treatment with entecavir (0.5 mg/day) for more than 1 year * Patient is ambulatory. * Patient is able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Any of below * Prior exposure to oral nucloes(t)ide analogue other than entecavir * Prior any exposure to interferon or pegylated interferon * Cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score ≥8 * Hepatocellular carcinoma Identified or suspected * Other malignancy * Prior organ transplantation * Under immunosuppressive agent * Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 1.4) * Pregnant woman or willing to be pregnant woman or man

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
HBsAg titer at 48 weeksat 48 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients with serum HBsAg decline greater than 1.0 log10 IU/mLat 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with serum HBsAg lossat 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with serum HBeAg loss or HBeAg seroconversionat 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with serum HBsAg decline of ≥0.5 log10 IU/mL and <1.0 log10 IU/mLat 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with normal ALTat 48 weeks of treatment
Adverse events: Creatine kinase level, GFR, Muscle events, Other AEsup to 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with virologic rebound or genotypic resistanceup to 48 weeks of treatment

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026