Skip to content

X-ray Dose Reduction in Electrophysiology

X-ray Dose Reduction in Electrophysiology

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01593852
Enrollment
136
Registered
2012-05-08
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2022-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Keywords

X-rays, Cardiac Electrophysiology, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Catheter Ablation

Brief summary

Allura Clarity is a novel X-ray imaging technology, that combines advanced real-time image noise reduction algorithms, with state-of-the-art hardware to reduce patient entrance dose significantly. This is realized by anatomy-specific optimization of the full acquisition chain (grid switch, beam filtering, pulse width, spot size, detector and image processing engine) for every clinical task individually. Furthermore, smaller focal spot sizes and shorter pulses are used, which are known to positively influence image quality . The primary aim of this study is to verify if a significant reduction in total procedural X-ray dose during electrophysiological interventions can be achieved by using advanced image processing (Allura Clarity).

Detailed description

X-ray dose and image quality are related by laws of physics. Low dose and high image quality cannot be achieved at the same time. However, image processing algorithms can help an x-ray system to acquire images with lower dose without influencing image quality or achieving higher image quality with equal dose. In order to introduce a dose reduction technology the most important aspect is to validate the diagnostic image information. Philips has developed a new algorithm that is capable to process images with similar image quality but acquired at lower dose.

Interventions

RADIATIONAdvanced image processing

Acquisition of x-ray images with reduced X-ray dose and advanced image processing

RADIATIONRegular image processing

Acquisition of x-ray images with regular X-ray dose and regular image processing

Sponsors

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
CollaboratorOTHER
Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with heart rhythm disturbances undergoing an interventional treatment for their heart rhythm disturbance * Patients who are allowed, able, willing to and have provided informed consent * Patients to be treated with ablation for atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent), atypical atrial flutter or patients to be treated with ablation for ischemic or non-ischemic ventricular tachycardia * Patients who are treated in heart catheterization room 5 (HCK5) of the Catherina Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age. * Patient who are pregnant or breast feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Dose Area Product (DAP) ValueDay 0Percentage reduction of reduced X-ray dose settings (Allura Clarity) vs. regular X-ray dose settings (AlluraXper) in DAP.
Cumulative Air Kerma (AK) ValueDay 0Percentage reduction of reducted X-ray dose settings (Allura Clarity) vs. regular X-ray dose settings (AlluraXper) in AK.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure DurationDay 0
Fluoroscopy TimeDay 0
Staff Dose Measured by DoseAware and Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD)Day 0Staff dose measured by Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD) worn by the operator over the lead apron (EPD operator) and the other mounted at a fixed location in the EP laboratory (EPD fixed)
Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsDay 0In both groups, default fluoroscopy dose settings were 'low', but could be changed by the operator to a medium or high setting for better imaging. The necessity to increase fluoroscopy dose for better imaging to medium or high was registered as a percentage of total number of fluoroscopy frames.
Serious Adverse EventsDay 0 if any
Physician Professional Judgment on Adequacy of Images for Performing the EP ProcedureDay 0If fluoroscopy time (see results in other secondary outcomes), number of exposure frames (see below) and procedure duration (see results in other secondary outcomes) are equivalent between the two groups, this will indicate that image quality (IQ) is equally adequate in both groups.
Physician Professional Judgment on Procedural SuccessDay 0Measurement of professional judgment (yes/no) of the treating physician.

Countries

Netherlands

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings
For patients in this group x-ray images are acquired with reduced dose settings of the x-ray system and advanced image processing Advanced image processing : Acquisition of x-ray images with reduced X-ray dose and advanced image processing
68
Regular X-ray Dose Settings
For patients in this group x-ray images are acquired with regular dose settings of the x-ray system and regular image processing
68
Total136

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReduced X-ray Dose SettingsRegular X-ray Dose SettingsTotal
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
68 participants68 participants136 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants51 Participants101 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 680 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 680 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Air Kerma (AK) Value

Percentage reduction of reducted X-ray dose settings (Allura Clarity) vs. regular X-ray dose settings (AlluraXper) in AK.

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Cumulative Air Kerma (AK) Value75 mGy
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Cumulative Air Kerma (AK) Value126 mGy
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Cumulative Dose Area Product (DAP) Value

Percentage reduction of reduced X-ray dose settings (Allura Clarity) vs. regular X-ray dose settings (AlluraXper) in DAP.

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Cumulative Dose Area Product (DAP) Value8.8 Gy*cm^2
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Cumulative Dose Area Product (DAP) Value15.3 Gy*cm^2
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Fluoroscopy Time

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Fluoroscopy Time24 minutesStandard Deviation 13
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Fluoroscopy Time26 minutesStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Physician Professional Judgment on Adequacy of Images for Performing the EP Procedure

If fluoroscopy time (see results in other secondary outcomes), number of exposure frames (see below) and procedure duration (see results in other secondary outcomes) are equivalent between the two groups, this will indicate that image quality (IQ) is equally adequate in both groups.

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Physician Professional Judgment on Adequacy of Images for Performing the EP Procedure83 Number of exposure framesStandard Deviation 89
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Physician Professional Judgment on Adequacy of Images for Performing the EP Procedure61 Number of exposure framesStandard Deviation 66
Secondary

Physician Professional Judgment on Procedural Success

Measurement of professional judgment (yes/no) of the treating physician.

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Physician Professional Judgment on Procedural Success91 percentage of procedural success
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Physician Professional Judgment on Procedural Success91 percentage of procedural success
Secondary

Procedure Duration

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Procedure Duration160 minutesStandard Deviation 58
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Procedure Duration162 minutesStandard Deviation 58
Secondary

Serious Adverse Events

Time frame: Day 0 if any

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Serious Adverse Events1 participants
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Serious Adverse Events0 participants
Secondary

Staff Dose Measured by DoseAware and Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD)

Staff dose measured by Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD) worn by the operator over the lead apron (EPD operator) and the other mounted at a fixed location in the EP laboratory (EPD fixed)

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Staff Dose Measured by DoseAware and Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD)EPD operator3 µSv
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Staff Dose Measured by DoseAware and Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD)EPD fixed10 µSv
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Staff Dose Measured by DoseAware and Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD)EPD operator6 µSv
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Staff Dose Measured by DoseAware and Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD)EPD fixed19 µSv
Secondary

Usage of Physician Controlled Dose Settings

In both groups, default fluoroscopy dose settings were 'low', but could be changed by the operator to a medium or high setting for better imaging. The necessity to increase fluoroscopy dose for better imaging to medium or high was registered as a percentage of total number of fluoroscopy frames.

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsLow86 percentage of total # of fluoro framesStandard Deviation 28
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsMedium2 percentage of total # of fluoro framesStandard Deviation 8
Reduced X-ray Dose Settings (Allura Clarity)Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsHigh12 percentage of total # of fluoro framesStandard Deviation 24
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsLow88 percentage of total # of fluoro framesStandard Deviation 20
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsMedium2 percentage of total # of fluoro framesStandard Deviation 9
Regular X-ray Dose Settings (AlluraXper)Usage of Physician Controlled Dose SettingsHigh9 percentage of total # of fluoro framesStandard Deviation 19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026