Skip to content

EEG Biofeedback Therapy as an Adjunct Treatment for PTSD

Placebo-controlled Study of EEG Biofeedback Therapy as an Adjunct Treatment for PTSD, Evaluating Symptoms and EEG Dynamics

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01591408
Enrollment
68
Registered
2012-05-04
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2016-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, PTSD, Sleep Disorders, Trauma

Keywords

EEG biofeedback, neurofeedback, therapy, adjunct

Brief summary

The proposed study, Placebo-controlled study of EEG biofeedback therapy as an adjunct treatment for PTSD, evaluating symptoms and EEG dynamics, will investigate the brain dynamics associated with PTSD symptom reduction associated with EEG biofeedback therapy or sham EEG biofeedback in addition to treatment as usual at the Naval Medical Center, San Diego (NMCSD) OASIS program. EEG biofeedback treatment protocols for PTSD and other disorders have been developed and honed by private practice clinicians over the past 25 years, during which EEG biofeedback has become an increasingly popular adjunct therapy. The reported success of EEG biofeedback as a non-drug intervention with lasting efficacy warrants a clinical study investigating not only symptom reduction, but also the underlying neurobiological mechanism. To this end, we propose a study using high density EEG recordings before and after treatment for PTSD symptoms to determine which brain activities correlate with reported symptom changes. The proposed study could expand treatment alternatives for servicemen with PTSD. If EEG biofeedback is shown to improve symptom reduction over the placebo controlled condition, it would offer a non-pharmacological intervention that would avoid undesirable side effects, and accelerate recovery compared with the current standard of care.

Detailed description

EEG biofeedback is an emerging alternative approach to treating PTSD, for which there is still insufficient evidence to assume unequivocal clinical utility. However, a 1991 report showed PTSD symptom reduction in 14 subjects receiving EEG biofeedback, as compared to 13 subjects receiving traditional treatment (Peniston, 1991), and a recent case study of 2 PTSD patients receiving EEG biofeedback therapy also showed reduce symptom severity using a newer protocol and device (Othmer, 2009). Another recent study focused on the anxiety symptoms of PTSD and showed that EEG biofeedback significantly reduced anxiety compared to subjects not receiving treatment (Walker, 2009). EEG biofeedback has also been explored as a treatment for non-PTSD related anxiety disorders, with results showing significant changes in reported anxiety correlated with increased or decreased alpha-frequency (\ 8-12 Hz) power (Hardt, 1978). Similarly, alpha-frequency EEG biofeedback has been shown to reduce anxiety and to reduce heart rate reactivity to a stressor after 8 sessions of EEG biofeedback training (Rice, 1993). While EEG biofeedback has been shown to significantly change EEG power dynamics (Egner, 2004), it is still unclear if and how EEG biofeedback can effect long-term and complex changes in cognitive and/or emotional functioning. Some attention has been given to other types of biofeedback for the treatment for PTSD, such as heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback, which may be relevant in understanding the background of biofeedback with respect to PTSD treatment. While one study reported no difference in symptom reduction between treatment as usual and treatment as usual plus HRV biofeedback (Lande, 2010), a handful of other studies have reported significant associations between HRV changes and PTSD symptoms. Specifically, increased HRV was significantly correlated with PTSD symptom reduction, which was more effective with respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) (which affects HRV) biofeedback than with progressive muscle relaxation (Zucker, 2009). Furthermore, combat-related PTSD subjects showed lower resting HRV than controls, but training with HRV biofeedback increased PTSD subjects' HRV and simultaneously decreased their PTSD symptoms (Tan, 2011). Finally, a quantitative EEG study showed that an acute session of RSA biofeedback was associated with an increase in alpha-band power and reduced higher frequency beta-band power, suggesting a neural impact of RSA training and HRV regulation (Sherlin, 2010). Summary The proposed study of EEG biofeedback at the OASIS program will not only address the clinical efficacy, but also the brain activations associated with specific symptoms of PTSD through collection of high-density EEG data before and after EEG biofeedback treatment. These data will help elucidate the neural correlates of PTSD symptom expression as well as address the potential efficacy of EEG biofeedback therapy as an adjunct treatment for PTSD-like symptoms.

Interventions

DEVICEEEG biofeedback

EEG data is collected from the scalp. Data is decomposed in real time and a portion of the signal is fed back to the subject via a vibrating stuffed animal and visual cues.

Sponsors

Naval Health Research Center
CollaboratorFED
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male, * active military, * participating in PTSD program at NMCSD

Exclusion criteria

* Seizure disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improved Symptom Ratings4 weeksWill test whether subjects receiving real EEG biofeedback report decreased anxiety and irritability relative to subjects receiving sham biofeedback. The scale for each rating was a 0-10, with 0 meaning not at all and 10 being extremely anxious/irritable.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EEG Biofeedback
Subjects will receive EEG biofeedback according to their own brain rhythms EEG biofeedback: EEG data is collected from the scalp. Data is decomposed in real time and a portion of the signal is fed back to the subject via a vibrating stuffed animal and visual cues.
24
Sham EEG Biofeedback
Subjects will receive feedback according to someone else's brain rhythms collected during a different session. EEG biofeedback: EEG data is collected from the scalp. Data is decomposed in real time and a portion of the signal is fed back to the subject via a vibrating stuffed animal and visual cues.
24
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEEG BiofeedbackSham EEG BiofeedbackTotal
Age, Continuous30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
29.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
29.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Gender
Female
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Gender
Male
22 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants24 participants48 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Improved Symptom Ratings

Will test whether subjects receiving real EEG biofeedback report decreased anxiety and irritability relative to subjects receiving sham biofeedback. The scale for each rating was a 0-10, with 0 meaning not at all and 10 being extremely anxious/irritable.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Subjects were active duty military with PTSD diagnosis currently in residential treatment facility

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EEG BiofeedbackImproved Symptom RatingsIrritability-2.62 Rating on scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
EEG BiofeedbackImproved Symptom RatingsAnxiety-2.25 Rating on scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Sham EEG BiofeedbackImproved Symptom RatingsIrritability-1.62 Rating on scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Sham EEG BiofeedbackImproved Symptom RatingsAnxiety-1.21 Rating on scaleStandard Deviation 2.23

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026