Skip to content

Patency of a Prototype Large Plastic Biliary Stent in the Palliation of Malignant Distal Biliary Strictures.

Prospective Evaluation of Luminal Patency of a Prototype Large Plastic Biliary Stent in the Palliation of Malignant Distal Biliary Strictures.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01590394
Enrollment
3
Registered
2012-05-03
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Obstruction, Stricture

Keywords

obstruction, bile duct, malignant

Brief summary

Plastic biliary stents which are a new larger size will remain free of obstructions for a longer period of time than currently used 10 French stents in cancer in the common bile duct.

Detailed description

Malignant obstruction of the extra-hepatic bile duct often leads to jaundice and pruritus and occasionally results in cholangitis and bacteremia. Pancreatic cancer accounts for a large proportion of patients presenting with malignant extra-hepatic biliary obstruction. Most pancreatic cancers are unresectable at presentation, and palliation, including biliary decompression, is often a goal of therapy. Over the last decade, biliary decompression with endoscopically-placed stents during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has largely replaced surgical bilioenteric diversion. Biliary decompression via endoscopic stenting alleviates cholestatic symptoms and improves quality of life. When compared to surgery, endoscopically placed plastic stents result in decreased morbidity and a trend towards decreased 30 day mortality. However, surgery is associated with a lower risk of recurrent biliary obstruction. Stent diameter is an important factor in determining duration of biliary luminal patency. All plastic biliary stents will ultimately occlude due to deposition of bacterial biofilm. The original plastic biliary stents were 7 French (Fr) in diameter, with a patency rate of about 4 weeks. With increases in the size of the working channel of duodenoscopes, the limiting factor in what diameter stent can be deployed, 10 Fr stents were developed, with patency rates of approximately 15 weeks (3-4 months). Until recently, the largest stent that could be deployed with the current endoscopic technology using a conventional duodenoscope of acceptable outer diameter was 11.5 Fr; the limited available data suggest that these stents do not offer more prolonged luminal patency interval compared to 10 Fr stents. In the early 1990s, self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) became available for use in palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Once deployed, SEMS achieve larger diameters than plastic stents, which results in a longer median patency interval of approximately six to eight months.\[3, 6, 9-12\] Although effective, metal stents are eight to ten times more costly than plastic stents. Recently, a large working channel duodenoscope with an acceptable outer diameter has been developed. This prototype duodenoscope allows passage of larger stents, which the investigators have successfully placed in select cases using this prototype. This duodenoscope, manufactured by Olympus Medical Systems Corp., is FDA approved. The investigators hypothesize that, with the substantially increased luminal diameter, larger plastic stents will provide more prolonged relief of obstructive jaundice in patients with malignant distal common bile duct strictures. If this proves to be true, larger plastic stents may constitute a cost-effective alternative to SEMS, especially in health care systems that cannot afford SEMS.

Interventions

DEVICELarge plastic biliary stent

Stent placement for bile duct obstruction.

Sponsors

Olympus America, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 1. ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years of age 2. Malignant biliary obstruction, known or suspected 3. Increased bilirubin or jaundice or history thereof 4. Duct stricture (obstruction) ≥ 1 cm distal to the biliary hilum (bifurcation of the common hepatic duct into the right and left hepatic ducts) 5. Not an operative candidate

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable to obtain consent 2. Unable to tolerate endoscopic procedure 3. Suspected non-malignant bile duct stricture 4. Candidate for potentially curative surgical intervention 5. Previous SEMS 6. Previous bile duct surgery 7. Diffuse liver metastasis 8. Peritoneal metastasis by CT 9. Presence of ascites 10. Duodenal obstruction preventing passage of the duodenoscope to the level of the papilla 11. Failure to cannulate bile duct during ERCP 12. Karnofsky performance score \< 40

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Large Plastic Biliary Stents Will Have a Longer Patency Time Than Conventionally Used 10 Fr Stents in Subjects as Compared to Well-known Published Historical Control Data.6 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pancreatic Cancer Patients
A large plastic biliary stent was placed in the bile duct for bile duct obstruction.
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPancreatic Cancer Patients
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Large Plastic Biliary Stents Will Have a Longer Patency Time Than Conventionally Used 10 Fr Stents in Subjects as Compared to Well-known Published Historical Control Data.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Data were not analyzed, because there were too few subjects to make the outcome measure meaningful. Principal investigator retired before any analysis could be performed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026