Skip to content

Reduced Planning Target Volume (PTV) Margins for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Using the Calypso 4D Localization System

Reduced PTV Margins for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer With IMRT Using Real-Time, State-of-the-Art Motion Tracking With the Calypso 4D Localization System: A Feasibility Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01589939
Acronym
PTV
Enrollment
40
Registered
2012-05-02
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2016-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Reduced Planning Target Volume, radiation therapy, Calypso

Brief summary

This prospective study evaluates the clinical utility of a novel real-time localization system allowing for smaller volumes of normal tissue to be included in radiation field and determines dosimetric parameters and adverse effect profiles of radiation therapy using this technology. Subjects will have beacon transponders implanted into the prostate to more precisely localize the position of the organ during radiation therapy. Hypothesis: 1. Treatment with highly targeted radiation therapy can be delivered in a daily treatment time consistent with routine clinical practice. 2. Highly targeted radiation therapy with reduced PTV margin will result in a significant decrease in rectal and bladder volume treated.

Detailed description

This study will seek to establish the clinical feasibility of a novel real-time localization and tracking system for use of reduced PTV margins during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which will allow treatment of smaller volumes of normal tissue during radiation therapy. Such a reduction in the PTV margins and the exposure of healthy tissue during treatment may allow for several future improvements in prostate radiotherapy including: * decreased acute and chronic adverse effects with similar local tumor control * dose escalation to achieve higher cure rates with similar adverse effects to standard dose treatment * hypofractionation to shorten the time of, and lower the expense of, treatment without increased adverse effects.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

The Geneva Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Low Risk: T1a, T1b, T1c, T2a; Gleason Score less than 7, PSA less than or equal to 10 * Intermediate Risk: T2b, T2c; Gleason Score less than or equal to 7, PSA less than or equal to 15 * Ability to comply with study schedule * Age 40 or older * Zubrod PS 0 or 1 * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Node positive or metastatic prostate cancer * Prior treatment of prostate cancer with surgery, chemotherapy, cryotherapy or brachytherapy * History of prior pelvic radiotherapy * History of abdominoperineal resection * History of HIV infection * History of chronic prostatitis or chronic cystitis * History of bleeding disorder or any active anticoagulation (excluding ASA) * PT or INR outside normal range for institution * Active implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers and automatic defibrillators. * Prosthetic implants in the pelvic region that contain metal or conductive materials (eg., an artificial hip). * Patients with maximum anterior-posterior separation through the torso minus the height of the center of the prostate greater than 17 cm (technical reason for Calypso System, see appendix 8). * Prior history of androgen deprivation therapy has been deleted and these patients are allowed on study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiation therapy with reduced treatment margins can be adopted as feasible for routine clinical useApproximately 8.5 weeks (43 fractions per pt.)During each radiation treatment fraction, therapists will record set up time, treatment time, total time and number of treatment interventions (repositioning/pausing) as well as the duration of the intervention caused by organ/target motion beyond planning target volume (PTV) margin using real time localization and tracking.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analyze dosimetric characteristics of treatment planningusually within the first 2 weeks after beacon placement (done at simulation CT)Standard methods vs. reduced planning target volume expansions will be analyzed: 1. Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), bladder and rectum 2. Volume receiving 77.4Gy by the prescription dose (V77.4Gy), V70Gy, and V50Gy of bladder and rectum
Assess incidence of acute bladder and rectal toxicityapproximately 25 months (assessed prior to beacons are placed and then throughout treatment and follow-up)toxicity is based on the RTOG/NCI CTC and EPIC quality of life survey.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026