Skip to content

Effectiveness of onaBoNT-A vs Oral Tamsulosin in Men With BPH and LUTS

Effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) vs Oral Tamsulosin in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia & Lower Urinary Track Symptoms (#02-10-10-05)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01589263
Enrollment
63
Registered
2012-05-01
Start date
2012-06-01
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2021-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Track Symptoms

Keywords

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Track Symptoms, BPH, LUTS

Brief summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and its related symptoms are a common condition that affects nearly half of men over age 50 and 90% of men over 80. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by BPH can be very troublesome, affect an individual's quality of life significantly, and are costly. his Phase 2 clinical research trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to compare the treatment effects of onaBoNT-A 200 U versus 0.4 mg per day of oral tamsulosin in male Veterans diagnosed with moderate to severe LUTS \[American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS) equal to or greater than 8\] associated with BPH. A total of 74 volunteers will be recruited to participate in this clinical trial. Volunteers will include only males who are greater than 50 years of age and diagnosed with LUTS associated with BPH. They are Veterans who visit the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Houston (MEDVAMC). There are no eligibility restrictions as to race or ethnicity.

Detailed description

This proposed intervention is the first randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of onaBoNT-A prostate injection versus alpha adrenergic antagonist medication for LUTS associated with BPH. Up to this point, clinical studies using onaBoNT-A in the prostate has been limited to patient's refractory to -1 adrenoceptor blocker therapy. The study will directly compare onaBoNT-A against -1 adrenoceptor blockers as frontline therapy in a male Veteran cohort suffering from moderate to severe LUTS. Besides its obvious efficacy in patients' refractory to -1 adrenoceptor blocker therapy, onaBoNTA injection has several potential advantages over oral agents. Focal prostate injection has been shown to be safe and obviates the systemic side effects observed with -1 adrenoceptor blockers (i.e. orthostatic hypotension, sexual dysfunction). In addition, most clinical studies demonstrate a durable response to onaBoNT-A treatment exceeding 12 months. Although this study is of modest length (i.e. total 4 years), significant results could drive paradigm shifts in how LUTS associated with BPH is treated, even with regards to frontline therapy. Although sophisticated molecular techniques (i.e. LCM with Microarray Analysis) have been used by other investigators to characterize gene profile changes with BPH and LUTS, this will be the first study examining gene profile changes in drug na ve BPH View Protocol Record patients following treatment with the -1 adrenoceptor blocker Tamsulosin or onaBoNT-A. This study is important because scant knowledge exists on the true mechanisms by which -1 adrenoceptor blockers like Tamsulosin or onaBoNT-A improve patient urinary tract symptoms and quality of life. It is clear, however, that nerves not only regulate prostate growth and function but also account for LUTS that drive patients to seek therapy. This investigation will utilize onaBoNT-A as a biological tool to identify potential novel mechanistic pathways for future investigation that will push the development of targeted therapy to benefit those patients refractory to all pharmacologic treatment. Potential inflammatory pathways or neural sensory signaling alterations induced by BPH, which are modified by onaBoNT-A or Tamsulosin to improve symptoms via gene profile changes, can be explored by expert laboratories in the Texas Medical Center. This is a highly collaborative project utilizing expertise across departments that will foster translational work from the laboratory to the patient. Although not the primary goal of this study, the investigators will also search for possible biological markers with prognostic value that could be confirmed in a future multi-center trial. The primary objective of this Phase 2 clinical research study is to compare the efficacy of 200 U onaBoNT-A injected into the prostate versus oral tamsulosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by BPH in male Veteran volunteers at the MEDVAMC. The secondary objective is to determine the impact of tamsulosin and onaBoNT-A on the pathologic parameters and RNA profiles of epithelium and stroma in BPH tissues. Volunteers will be randomized into two groups with one receiving ona-BoNT-A injection into the prostate and an oral placebo pill taken once daily and the other group will receive a placebo injection and an oral tamsulosin pill once daily. Volunteers will make five clinic visits and be contacted by telephone twice.

Interventions

DRUGTamsulosin + placebo

0.4 mg capsule daily for 3 months Arms: ARM 2: Saline + Tamsulosin

DRUGonaBoNT-A + placebo

200 U prostate injection once Arms: ARM 1: onaBoNT-A + placebo

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males at least 50 years of age * American Urological Association Symptom Score greater than 8 * Voided volume greater than 125 ml * Maximum urinary flowrate less than 15 ml/sec. * Must agree to all procedures and willfully consented

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior surgical intervention or use of 5-alpha-reductase medical intervention for BPH * Current diagnosis of acute or chronic prostatitis (which may cause LUTS that mimic BPH) * Previous exposure to onabotulinumtoxinA * Overactive bladder without obstructive symptoms (i.e. decrease in force of stream, hesitancy, intermittency, post-void dribbling) * Active urinary tract disease or biopsy of the prostate within the past 6 weeks; * Two documented urinary tract infections of any type in the past year (UTI defined as greater than 100,000 colonies per ml urine from midstream clean catch or catheterized specimen) * Uncontrolled diabetes * History of bladder calculi (stones) * Penile prosthesis or artificial urinary sphincter \[placement\] * Documented bacterial or acute prostatitis within the past year * Episode of unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, or cerebrovascular accident (stroke) within the past 6 months * Known primary neurologic conditions such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis or Parkinson's disease, or other neurological diseases known to affect bladder function * History or current evidence of carcinoma of the prostate or bladder, pelvic radiation or surgery, urethral stricture, or bladder neck obstruction * Cancer that is not considered cured, except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (cured defined as no evidence of cancer within the past 5 years) * Any serious medical condition that is likely to impede successful completion of the study, such as certain mental disorders, hypersensitivity to onabotulinumtoxinA or anesthetics used in the study, syncope * Daily use of a pad or device for incontinence required * Interested in future fertility * Postvoid Residual (PVR) greater than 350 ml * Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 8 ng/ml (Hybritech). For those with a PSA between 4-8 ng/ml, the PSA elevation must be considered to be from a benign cause in the opinion of the PI. This decision can be based on PSA velocity, previous TRUS (transrectal ultrasound) biopsy, percent free PSA, or other clinical estimations in keeping with sound urologic care * Has taken phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine, imipramine, an anticholinergic, or cholinergic medication within the past 2 weeks * Has taken estrogen, androgen, any drug producing androgen suppression, or anabolic steroids within the past 4 months * Taking aminoglycosides or any drug that interfere with neuromuscular transmission. Eaton-Lambert syndrome, hemophilia, hereditary clotting factors deficiency, or bleeding diathesis * Must be off aspirin, NSAIDS, and Coumadin for 7 or more days prior to onabotulinumtoxinA injection * Enrolled in another treatment trial for any disease within the past 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS)3 monthsAUA Symptom Score on a scale of 0 to 35, 35 is the worse outcome and 0 is the best outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

63 subjects were consented and Informed Consent was signed by all of the subjects. These subjects were selected from PI's medical clinic. PI and the CRC explained the study to these subjects but only 21 participants started the intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ARM 1: onaBoNT-A + Placebo
onaBoNT-A 200 U prostate injection and placebo oral capsule daily onaBoNT-A + placebo: 200 U prostate injection once Arms: ARM 1: onaBoNT-A + placebo Tamsulosin + placebo: 0.4 mg capsule daily for 3 months Arms: ARM 2: Saline + Tamsulosin
9
ARM 2: Saline + Tamsulosin
Placebo prostate injection (saline) and tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule daily. onaBoNT-A + placebo: 200 U prostate injection once Arms: ARM 1: onaBoNT-A + placebo Tamsulosin + placebo: 0.4 mg capsule daily for 3 months Arms: ARM 2: Saline + Tamsulosin
12
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicARM 1: onaBoNT-A + PlaceboARM 2: Saline + TamsulosinTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
AUA Symptom Score22.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.92
22.78 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.78
22.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.85
Bladder Function Score7.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.58
7.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.44
7.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.51
BPH Impact Score7.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.83
6.11 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11
6.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
Ejaculation Function Score20.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.58
17.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.44
19.01 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.01
Erectile Function Score21.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.58
29.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.56
25.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.57
Prostate Volume26.79 CC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.79
32.33 CC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.33
29.56 CC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.56
PSA1.35 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35
1.725 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.725
1.5 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
9 participants12 participants21 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 90 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 90 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS)

AUA Symptom Score on a scale of 0 to 35, 35 is the worse outcome and 0 is the best outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Volunteers were randomized on a 1:1 assignment by the MEDVAMC Research Pharmacy to either: ARM 1: BoNT-A 200 U prostate injection and placebo oral capsule daily or ARM 2: Placebo prostate injection (saline) and Tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule daily.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARM 1: onaBoNT-A + PlaceboAmerican Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS)18.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
ARM 2: Saline + TamsulosinAmerican Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS)14.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026