Skip to content

PacLitaxel Eluting Balloon Application In Sfa In Stent Restenosis

PacLitaxel Eluting Balloon Application In Sfa In Stent Restenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01587482
Acronym
PLAISIR
Enrollment
53
Registered
2012-04-30
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2016-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

Superficial femoral artery, endovascular, Drug eluting balloon, Paclitaxel

Brief summary

Nowadays, stenting is became a standard of care in revascularization for superficial femoral artery (SFA) atherosclerotic lesions. However, the Achilles' heel of this technique remains in-stent restenosis (ISR). While most of local therapies have failed to demonstrate significant benefit, studies for the treatment of SFA ISR are lacking and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty remains the current standard of care for this indication. Recent studies have shown successful results of drug eluting balloon in the treatment of SFA de-novo lesions and of coronary ISR. FREERIDE, a French prospective cohort has been set up to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of drug eluting balloon (DEB) for the treatment of SFA atherosclerotic lesions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPacLitaxel Eluting Balloon Application

Stenting is a standard of care in revascularization for superficial femoral artery (SFA) atherosclerotic lesions. However, the Achilles' heel of this technique remains in-stent restenosis (ISR). While most of local therapies have failed to demonstrate significant benefit, studies for the treatment of SFA ISR are lacking and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty remains the current standard of care for this indication. Recent studies have shown successful results of drug eluting balloon in the treatment of SFA de-novo lesions and of coronary ISR.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years old * Symptomatic patient according to Rutherford Class 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 * Clinical degradation by at least 1 Rutherford stage or absence of healing of all skin lesions * Symptoms related to SFA ISR defined by PSVR \> 2.4 within 3 to 24 months after SFA stenting of de novo atherosclerotic lesions. Each patient may have either one or both limbs treated in the study * The target ISR lesion is fully comprised between the origin of the SFA and distally the femoropopliteal crossover (crossing by SFA of medial rim of femur in the PA projection) * Adequate SFA inflow and outflow either pre-existing or successfully re-established (outflow defined as patency of at least one infragenicular artery) * The target lesion must no extend beyond the stent margin * Successful crossing of the target lesion, inflow and outflow lesions with a guidewire * Patient belongs to the French health care system * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* No atheromatous disease * Asymptomatic lesion * Known allergies to heparin, aspirin, other anti-coagulant/antiplatelet therapies, and/or paclitaxel * Acute limb ischemia * Patient on oral anticoagulation therapy * Target lesion requires / has been pre-treated with alternative therapy such as: DES, laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, cutting/scoring balloon, etc. * Life expectancy \< 1 year * Patient involved in another trial * Refusing patient * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)at 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target extremity revascularization (TER)at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after surgery
clinical improvement equal or above to a stage according to Rutherford classification without superficial femoral artery revascularizationat 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 monthsto assess primary maintenance of clinical improvement
peak systolic velocity index without Target Lesion Revascularizationat 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 monthsto assess primary patency
Quality of life assessment by EQ5D questionnaireat 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 mois after surgery
post-angioplasty restenosisat 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and18 months after surgery
Major Adverse Events throughat 1 year
Length of hospitalization stayat 1 year
clinical improvement equal or above to a stage according to Rutherford classification with possible superficial femoral artery surgeryat 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 monthsto assess secondary maintenance of clinical improvement
peak systolic velocity indexat 1 yearto assess secondary patency
intra-stent restenosisat 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after surgerysignificant whether restenosis \>50% and peak systolic velocity index \> 2.4
drug relief success without balloon breakduring surgery

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026