Skip to content

Catheter Contact Force and Electrograms

Relationship Between Catheter Contact Force and Electrogram Characteristics in Fibrillating Human Atrial Myocardium

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01587404
Enrollment
55
Registered
2012-04-30
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2018-08-21
Last updated
2019-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Electrogram, Ablation, Contact Force

Brief summary

Until recently, there was no way of telling how firmly the tip of the catheter was in contact with the heart and how this contact was orientated. The electrical signals measured through the catheters, known as electrograms, are used to guide the sites and duration of ablation, but the effect of catheter contact and orientation on these signals in human heart muscle that is fibrillating is not known. New catheters have now been developed which can measure the force of contact at their tip: using these, the investigators will examine how contact force affects the electrical behaviour of heart muscle tissue in atrial fibrillation. The effect the force of contact has on the electrogram recorded will also be investigated. In so doing we hope to gain a better understanding of the relationship between tissue contact and the electrograms we measure and in so doing improve the safety and effectiveness of ablation procedures. Hypothesis: Catheter contact force and orientation have a significant impact on the characteristics of bipolar electrograms in the fibrillating human atrium.

Interventions

DEVICETHERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH™ Catheter (including Surround Flow)

Variable contact force as measured at the catheter tip within the left atrium

Sponsors

Barts & The London NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation * Listed for ablation of atrial fibrillation on clinical grounds

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to catheter ablation * Contraindication to anticoagulation * Contraindication to TOE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrogram characteristicsBaseline and 30 secondsEffect of changes in contact force and orientation on: slew rate, local mean cycle length, electrogram complexity and fractionation index, dominant frequency, organisation index, CFAE grade, interval confidence level, shortest complex interval and average complex interval

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrogram amplitudeBaseline and 30 seconds
Electrogram responses to ablationBaseline and 30 secondsSlew rate, local mean cycle length, electrogram complexity and fractionation index, dominant frequency, organisation index, CFAE grade, interval confidence level, shortest complex interval and average complex interval, amplitude change, AF cycle length, catheter impedance.
Ablation Power (Watts)Baseline and 30 secondsThe interaction between catheter contact force and orientation and the power attained during power limited ablation
Electrogram Contact MappingDuring StudyUse of contact catheters - Constellation and/or PentaRay Catheter to record fibrillatory electrograms and identify areas of interest

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026