Skip to content

Cytosponge Protocol IRB 11-006429

Cytosponge Protocol

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01585103
Enrollment
86
Registered
2012-04-25
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2016-06-07
Last updated
2022-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Brief summary

This study is being done to collect data on the potential use of the cytosponge as non-invasive tool in evaluating patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Interventions

An ingestible gelatin capsule containing a compressed mesh attached to a string. The capsule is swallowed and once in the stomach, the gelatin dissolves and a spherical mesh of 3 cm diameter is released. The mesh is withdrawn through the mouth by the attached string and a cytologic specimen is collected.

Sponsors

University of Cambridge
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients between the ages of 18 and 65 with eosinophilic esophagitis including lactating or pregnant women undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy and esophageal biopsy.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients for whom clinically indicated endoscopy is not safe. Patients who have small caliber esophagus, an esophageal stricture that will not permit passage of the gelatin capsule or are unable to swallow the capsule. * Vulnerable populations, such as those with diminished mental acuity, will be excluded. * Patients with known Lidocaine/Acetylcysteine allergies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Specificity of the CytospongeBaselinePercent specificity of Cytosponge ability to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis when compared to upper endoscopy and biopsies/swab testing. Cytology specimens will be reviewed by one pathologist who will read them blindly without knowledge of the results of the biopsy specimens. To calculate specificity: 100% the number of true negatives divided by the sum of the number of true negatives plus the number of false positives.
Percent Sensitivity of the CytospongeBaselinePercent sensitivity of Cytosponge ability to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis when compared to upper endoscopy and biopsies/swab testing. Cytology specimens will be reviewed by one pathologist who will read them blindly without knowledge of the results of the biopsy specimens. To calculate sensitivity: 100% the number of true positives divided by the sum of the number of true positives plus the number of false negatives

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cytosponge/ Brushing
Subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy and biopsy either for initial diagnosis or for monitoring the activity of their disease will be asked to swallow the cytosponge two hours prior to endoscopy. Cytosponge: An ingestible gelatin capsule containing a compressed mesh attached to a string. The capsule is swallowed and once in the stomach, the gelatin dissolves and a spherical mesh of 3 cm diameter is released. The mesh is withdrawn through the mouth by the attached string and a cytologic specimen is collected.
86
Total86

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyUnable to swallow Cytosponge6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCytosponge/ Brushing
Age, Continuous42 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
86 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
86 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 86
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Sensitivity of the Cytosponge

Percent sensitivity of Cytosponge ability to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis when compared to upper endoscopy and biopsies/swab testing. Cytology specimens will be reviewed by one pathologist who will read them blindly without knowledge of the results of the biopsy specimens. To calculate sensitivity: 100% the number of true positives divided by the sum of the number of true positives plus the number of false negatives

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cytosponge/ BrushingPercent Sensitivity of the Cytosponge75 percentage of samples
Primary

Percent Specificity of the Cytosponge

Percent specificity of Cytosponge ability to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis when compared to upper endoscopy and biopsies/swab testing. Cytology specimens will be reviewed by one pathologist who will read them blindly without knowledge of the results of the biopsy specimens. To calculate specificity: 100% the number of true negatives divided by the sum of the number of true negatives plus the number of false positives.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cytosponge/ BrushingPercent Specificity of the Cytosponge86 percentage of samples

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026