Skip to content

The Effect of OMT on Patients With COPD: Correlating Pulmonary Function Tests With Biochemical Alterations

The Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:Correlating Pulmonary Function Tests With Biochemical Alterations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01582958
Enrollment
45
Registered
2012-04-23
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2015-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment, Pulmonary Function Tests, Biochemical Alterations

Brief summary

This project proposes to test the hypothesis that osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) given to patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) enrolled in a 12-week pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) will result in improved respiratory pump function over and above that seen in sham and control groups. Specifically, we will study the effects of three OMT techniques: (a) thoracic inlet indirect myofascial release; (b) rib raising with continued stretch of the paraspinal muscle to the L2 level; and (c) cervical paraspinal muscle stretch with suboccipital muscle release. The key clinical readouts will include: spirometry, P100 (and index of diaphragm and inspiratory muscle efficiency), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), as well as laser evaluation of chest wall excursion. Supplementing these objective parameters will be several more subjective clinical outcome measures: exercise tolerance (6-minute walk test), dyspnea (shortness of breath questionnaire), and quality of life questionnaire. Finally, an attempt will be made to correlate biochemical alterations that may shed light on the biological mechanism underlying the OMT procedures.

Detailed description

According to the above directions (provide a more extensice description, if desired), I am choosing to just submit the brief summary. Thank you, Sherman Gorbis, DO

Interventions

PROCEDUREOsteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) is the therapeutic application of manually guided forces by an Osteopathic physician to improve physiologic function.

Hands are placed on subjects the same as omt arm but no omt is provided.

Sponsors

Michigan State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
49 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC \<0.7 and FEV1 \<80% predicted \[FEV1 =volume that has been exhaled at the end of the first second of forced expiration\] and FVC volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration\] * history of smoking \>20 pack-years * stable condition at inclusion with no infection or exacerbation for at least two months * optimal medical therapy for at least eight weeks with no change

Exclusion criteria

* history of active pulmonary disease such as asthma * positive bronchodilator test * treatment with N-acetylcysteine * previous diagnosis of hypertension or current anti-hypertensive treatment * known unstable or moderate to severe heart disease (arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, or cardiomyopathy) * previous diagnosis of chronic illness such as diabetes, renal failure, hypercholesterolemia, hepatic cirrhosis, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis or any other systemic inflammatory disease * neuromuscular or disabling cognitive problems * engagement in any exercise-training program during the past three months * substance abuse in the preceding six months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in spirometry at 6 weeks and 12 weeksbaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksamount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled
Change from baseline in P100 at 6 weeks and 12 weeksbaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksan index of diaphragm and inspiratory muscle efficiency (endurance)
Change from baseline in MIP (maximum inspiratory pressure) and MEP (maximum expiratory pressure)at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksassessments of inspiratory and expiratory muscle function, respectively
Change from baseline in inspiratory capacity at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksrepresenting an indirect evaluation of chest wall excursion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in exercise tolerance at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks6-minute walk test
Change from baseline in profiling of plasma proteins at 6weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksantibody microarray analysis (particularly targeting the inflammatory/anti-inflammatory cytokines)
Change from baseline in dyspnea (shortness of breath) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksshortness of breath questionnaire
Change from baseline in quality of life at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksShort Form 36 questionnaire
Change from baseline in profiling of the plasma metabolome at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeksmass spectrometry (both non-targeted profiling of entire suite of metabolites and targeted profiling of oxylipins and endocannabinoid metabolites

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026