Skip to content

Postoperative Nasal Irrigation Using Mucolytic Agents

Postoperative Nasal Irrigation Using Mucolytic Agents in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01582555
Enrollment
44
Registered
2012-04-20
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2012-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Keywords

mucolysis, QOL, endoscopy, sinus surgery

Brief summary

Nasal irrigation techniques have been used for many years and been shown to improve symptoms of rhinosinusitis. Although there is a wealth of literature available, establishing treatment protocols can be difficult because of the great variability in recommended composition (seawater or hypertonic or isotonic saline with or without additives) and irrigation technique (variations in pressure and volume). Nasal irrigation is also used in many centers as part of postoperative treatment protocols and in particular has been recommended following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Nasal crusting and thick nasal discharge have a negative impact on these patients quality of life (QOL). At the time of our study, there are no studies comparing irrigation with mucolysis with saline irrigation following ESS. The investigators aimed to assess whether mucolysis is effective at improving patients QOL and reducing postoperative signs as assessed endoscopically.

Detailed description

The study will take place at Tel Aviv Sourasky medical center, otolaryngology outpatient clinic, a tertiary care academic hospital, for two years. It will be double-arm, open label, randomized controlled trial comparing two different methods of medical therapy following ESS. The allocation ratio is intended to be approximately equal for each arm. The two arms consisted of: a control arm (group A) of generic saline irrigation alone, irrigating with 20 mL per nostril tid for a total of 120 mL daily irrigation; and intervention arm (group B), which included generic N-Acetylcystine of 200 mg dissolved in 200 mL saline irrigated as per group A, 20 mL per nostril given tid daily (for a total of 120 mg). All medications will be used daily for the 3 months duration of the post-operative follow up. Patients will be instructed as to correct irrigation technique prior to discharge home from the hospital, and will be reminded of this technique at each postoperative clinic visit.

Interventions

DRUGsaline nasal irrigation alone

control arm (group A) of generic saline irrigation alone, irrigating with 20 mL per nostril tid for a total of 120 mL daily irrigation

DRUGdissolved N-Acetylcystine

intervention arm (group B), which included generic N-Acetylcystine of 200 mg dissolved in 200 mL saline irrigated as per group A, 20 mL per nostril given tid daily (for a total of 120 mg).

Sponsors

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 or over 2. Patient undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to N-Acetylcysteine, 2. Any other nasal surgery performed concomitantly 3. Diagnosed with inflammatory (e.g. Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis) nasal pathology 4. Diagnosed with systemic conditions affecting the nose e.g. Cystic fibrosis, Kartagener's syndrome 5. Unable to give informed consent due to mental impairment 6. Unable to adhere follow up or treatment. 7. Patients requiring any additional nasal sprays (e.g. steroid sprays)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in QOL based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores1 yThe primary outcome measure is change in QOL based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores.(5) SNOT-22 scores were chosen as the primary outcome due to the importance of studying patient QOL outcomes as opposed to imaging or endoscopy scores that often do not correlate with patients' subjective perceptions of disease severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (LKES)1ySecondary outcomes are the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (LKES) of each side of the nose that will be graded between 0 and 2 as recommended by the International Congress on Sinus Disease (Adhesions, Polyps, Crusting: 0 = none, 1 = middle meatus only, 2 = beyond middle meatus; Discharge: 0 = none, 1 = clear, thin, 2 = thick, purulent; Edema: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = severe)

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactAVRAHAM ABRGEL, MD
97236973544

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026