Skip to content

Warm Water Versus Room Temperature Water Immersion Colonoscopy

Warm Water Versus Room Temperature Water Immersion Colonoscopy - a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Single-center Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01582178
Enrollment
212
Registered
2012-04-20
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2013-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

colonoscopy, warm water immersion, cool water immersion

Brief summary

Water immersion insertion has been documented to decrease procedure-related discomfort during colonoscopy. There was used warm water infusion for colonoscope insertion in most of the water immersion colonoscopy trials. The investigators have been using room temperature water (20-24°C) for water immersion and the investigators did not notice any drawback of it. In our opinion, it is simpler and cheaper option for water immersion colonoscopy and proof of its efficacy and safety could support the use of water immersion technique in routine practice. The primary endpoint is cecal intubation time and the investigators suppose that the use of warm water infusion does not shorten it significantly. Patient comfort during colonoscope insertion, water consumption, length of the scope while reaching the cecum, need for external compression, need for positioning of the patient and endoscopist´s difficulty with colonoscopy will be also assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREWarm Water Immersion Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy using warm water (37°C) infusion for colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.

PROCEDURECool Water Immersion Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy using room temperature water (20-24°C) infusion for colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.

Sponsors

Vitkovice Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* outpatient diagnostic colonoscopy * bowel prep with macrogolum * initial 2 mg of midazolam i.v. * signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* planned therapeutic intervention * colorectal surgery in history * known inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal cancer * refusal of sedation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cecal Intubation Time3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient Comfort During Insertion Phase of the Colonoscopy3 months

Countries

Czechia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients older than 18 years referred to our unit for diagnostic outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were excluded if they has a history of colorectal surgery, known diagnosis of IBD, chronic benzodiazepine use and if they refused sedation. The period between June and October 2012.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were not included if they did not fulfill inclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Warm Water Immersion Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using purely warm water (37°C) infusion during colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
106
Cool Water Immersion Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using purely room temperature water (20-24°C) infusion during colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
106
Total212

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision65

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCool Water Immersion ColonoscopyWarm Water Immersion ColonoscopyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
63 Participants59 Participants122 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
43 Participants47 Participants90 Participants
Age Continuous57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
106 participants106 participants212 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants48 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants58 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1060 / 106
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1060 / 106

Outcome results

Primary

Cecal Intubation Time

Time frame: 3 months

Primary

Cecal Intubation Time

= time between introduction of the colonoscope into the anus and reaching the cecum.

Time frame: 1-30

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Warm Water Immersion ColonoscopyCecal Intubation Time7.0 minuteStandard Deviation 3.4
Cool Water Immersion ColonoscopyCecal Intubation Time6.9 minuteStandard Deviation 3.5
p-value: 0.89Fisher Exact
Secondary

Patient Comfort During Insertion Phase of the Colonoscopy

Time frame: 3 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026