Skip to content

Multicenter Study of Peritransplantation Immunosuppression for Mismatched Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Reduced Intensity Conditioning

Multicenter Phase II Study of Peritransplantation Immunosuppression Using ATG, Rituximab, Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patient Receiving Mismatched Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Reduced Intensity Conditioning With Fludarabine and Treosulfan

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01582048
Enrollment
9
Registered
2012-04-20
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2016-08-17
Last updated
2022-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients Receiving Mismatched Allogeneic HCT

Brief summary

Feasibility and toxicity of peritransplantation immunosuppression with ATG, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab in patients receiving mismatched allogeneic HCT after a reduced intensity conditioning regimen with fludarabine/treosulfan

Interventions

DRUGimmunosuppression

Conditioning with treosulfan 14 g/m2 day -6 to -4, fludarabine 30 mg/m2/24h day-6 to -2, ATG-Fresenius 20 mg/kg day -4 to -2, rituximab 500 mg/m2 day -1. Unmanipulated PBSC day 0. Postgrafting immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil (15 mg/kg TID) and sirolimus (2 mg QD).

Sponsors

medac GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Neovii Biotech
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Bethge
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for mismatched allogeneic HCT * Unrelated donor with maximal 2 antigen or allelic mismatches in HLA-I or HLA-II * Age \>=75, \>=18 years * Patients Age \<=50 if a HCT-CI score \> 2 \[acc. to Sorror et al., 2005\] * Karnofsky Index \>60% * Patients with: * Acute myeloid leukemia in CR (\<5% blasts) * Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in CR (\< 5% blasts) * Myelodysplastic syndrome with up to 20% blasts * Osteomyelofibrosis * Chronic lymphocytic leukemia * High grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in CR or PR * Low grad Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in CR or PR * M. Hodgkin in CR or PR * Chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase or CR of blast crisis

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with \>5% blasts in BM at the time of transplantation * Progressive or chemorefractory disease * Less than 3 months after preceding HCT * CNS involvement with disease * Fungal infections with radiological progression after receipt of amphotericin B or active triazole for greater than 1 month. * Liver function abnormalities with bilirubin \>2 mg/dL and elevation of transaminases higher 2x upper limit of normal. * Chronic active viral hepatitis * Ejection fraction \<40 % on echocardiography * Patients with \> grade II hypertension by CTC criteria * Creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min * Proteinuria \>800 mg/24 h * Respiratory failure necessitating supplemental oxygen or DLCO \<30% * Allergy against murine antibodies * Known allergy/intolerance against sirolimus or one of it's excipients * HIV-Infection * Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding, or adults of reproductive potential not employing an effective method of birth control during study treatment and for at least 12 months thereafter. (Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at study entry) * Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study, unstable and uncontrolled hypertension, chronic renal disease, or active uncontrolled infection) which could compromise participation in the study * Patients with a history of psychiatric illness or condition which could interfere with their ability to understand the requirements of the study (this includes alcoholism/drug addiction) * Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol * Unable to give informed consent * Enrollment in an other trial interfering with the endpoints of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Treatment related mortality12 months after HCT

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Engraftment on day 100on day 100
Overall survival12 months after HCT
Incidence of graft versus host disease3 months after HCT
Toxicity according CTC of protocol on day 100on day 100
Immune reconstitution of CD3, CD3/CD4/CD8, CD56, CD19 cells3 months after HCT
Disease free survival24 months after HCT
Disease response12 months after HCT
Incidence of infections2 years after HCT

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026