Skip to content

Cold Urticaria Treatment With Xolair

A Two-center, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Parallel Design to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 150 and 300 mg Omalizumab in Subjects With Antihistamine-resistant Cold Contact Urticaria (CCU)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01580592
Acronym
CUTEX
Enrollment
31
Registered
2012-04-19
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2017-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cold Contact Urticaria

Brief summary

Urticaria is a very frequent skin condition characterised by transient wheal and flare type skin reactions associated with severe pruritus. Cold contact urticaria (CCU) is a frequent form of physical urticaria that is characterized by the development of wheal and flare type skin reactions due to the release of histamine and other proinflammatory mast cell mediators following exposure of the skin to cold. Among all physical urticaria subtypes the frequency of CCU varies between 5.7% and 33.8% in different studies. Physical urticarias including CCU are known to severely impair the quality of life of affected patients. The treatment of choice in CCU, as well as in other inducible forms and spontaneous urticaria, are non-sedating H1 antihistamines. Recent data have shown that updosing of H1 blockers is significantly more effective in reducing symptoms in cold urticaria than standard-dose treatment. Thus, patients who cannot be sufficiently controlled with standard-dose antihistamines should receive high-dose H1 blockers up to 4 times the standard dose as recommended by the new international guidelines for the management of urticaria. Previous phase II studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria have shown favorable results for the treatment with omalizumab (Xolair®). Proof-of-concept data from completed studies suggest that omalizumab improves urticaria in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria who have failed treatment with H1 antihistamines as well as those who have failed treatment with a combination of H1 and H2 antihistamines and a leukotriene receptor antagonist. In addition, two case reports of patients with severe therapy refractory CCU treated with omalizumab reported a complete response with no urticarial symptoms after cold challenge. In summary, these data suggest that omalizumab may have a beneficial effect in the treatment of CCU.

Interventions

DRUGOmalizumab

150mg, s.c., every 4 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, s.c., every 4 weeks

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults (18 years or older) Informed consent signed and dated Able to read, understand and willing to sign the informed consent form and abide with study procedures Diagnosis of CCU lasting for at least 6 months Willing, committed and able to return for all clinic visits and complete all study-related procedures, including willingness to have SC injections administered by a qualified person In females of childbearing potential: Negative pregnancy test; females willing to use highly effective contraception (Pearl-Index \< 1). A woman will be considered not of childbearing potential if she is post-menopausal for greater than two years or surgically sterile (bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy) No participation in other clinical trials 4 weeks before and after participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

Patients with acute urticaria Concurrent/ongoing treatment with immunosuppressives (e.g. systemic steroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, dapsone or others) within 4 weeks or 5 half lives prior to day 0, whichever is longer Significant medical condition rendering the patient immunocompromised or not suitable for a clinical trial Significant concomitant illness that would adversely affect the subject's participation or evaluation in this study History of malignancies within five years prior to screening other than a successfully treated non-metastatic cutaneous, basal, or squamous cell carcinoma and/or in situ cancer Presence of clinically significant laboratory abnormalities Lactating females or pregnant females Subjects for whom there is concern about compliance with the protocol procedures Any medical condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with participation in the study or place the subject at risk History of substance abuse (drug or alcohol) or any other factor (e.g., serious psychiatric condition) within the last 5 years that could limit the subject's ability to comply with study procedures Subjects who are detained officially or legally to an official institute Previous use of omalizumab within the last 6 months Intake of antihistamines or leukotriene antagonists within 7 days prior to visit 1 Intake of oral corticosteroids within 14 days prior to visit 1 Use of depot corticosteroids or chronic systemic corticosteroids within 21 days before beginning of the study Known hypersensitivity to any ingredients, including excipients (sucrose, histidine, polysorbate 20) of the study medication or drugs related to omalizumab (e.g.: monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal gammaglobulin)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placeboday 70The primary efficacy outcome was the change in trigger thresholds from baseline to week ten using TempTest® to assess critical temperature thresholds in °C.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Eventsday 70This includes physical examination, routine safety laboratory assessments, vital signs and adverse event reporting

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Omalizumab 150mg
Omalizumab: 150mg, s.c., every 4 weeks
10
Omalizumab 300mg
Omalizumab: 300mg, s.c., every 4 weeks
9
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo, s.c., every 4 weeks
12
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOmalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants9 Participants12 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants9 Participants12 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
10 participants9 participants12 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 104 / 95 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 90 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo

The primary efficacy outcome was the change in trigger thresholds from baseline to week ten using TempTest® to assess critical temperature thresholds in °C.

Time frame: day 70

Population: female and male

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omalizumab 150mgChange in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo-10.6 degree celciusStandard Deviation 7.6
Omalizumab 300mgChange in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo-10.4 degree celciusStandard Deviation 9.4
PlaceboChange in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo-0.3 degree celciusStandard Deviation 3.9
p-value: 0.001ANOVA
p-value: 0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events

This includes physical examination, routine safety laboratory assessments, vital signs and adverse event reporting

Time frame: day 70

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Omalizumab 150mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events7 participants
Omalizumab 300mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events9 participants
p-value: 0.988Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026