Skip to content

Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of OMS302 in Subjects Undergoing Intraocular Lens Replacement With Phacoemulsification

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Pharmacokinetics of OMS302 and the Effect of OMS302 on Intraoperative Pupil Diameter and Early Postoperative Pain in Subjects Undergoing Intraocular Lens Replacement With Phacoemulsification

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01579565
Acronym
OMS302-ILR-004
Enrollment
416
Registered
2012-04-18
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2017-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraocular Lens Replacement

Keywords

cataract, lens replacement

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of OMS302 (the study drug) for maintaining intraoperative mydriasis and preventing post operative pain in individuals undergoing Intraocular Lens Replacement (ILR) surgery.

Interventions

DRUGOMS302

OMS302 drug product will be supplied as a sterile, clear colorless liquid, free from particulates of foreign matter. Each vial contains a nominal 4.5 mL solution containing 60.75 millimolar (mM) phenylephrine hydrochloride (HCl) and 11.25 mM ketorolac tromethamine formulated in a 20 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.3 +/- 0.5). For administration to patients, 4.4 mL of the drug product is added to a 500 mL bottle of commercially available balanced saline salt (BSS) through a syringe filter. This will achieve 4.0 mL of the drug product in a 500 mL bottle of BSS.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo drug product will be supplied as a sterile, clear colorless liquid, free from particulates of foreign matter. Each vial contains a nominal 4.5 mL solution containing 20 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.3 +/- 0.5). For administration to patients, 4.4 mL of the drug product is added to a 500 mL bottle of commercially available BSS through a syringe filter. This will achieve 4.0 mL of the drug product in a 500 mL bottle of BSS.

Sponsors

Omeros Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Competent and willing to voluntarily provide informed consent * 18 years of age or older * In good general health needing to undergo cataract extraction or lens extraction with lens replacement surgery in one eye, under topical anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* No allergies to the medications and/or the active ingredients of any of the study medications * No medications with the same activities of the active ingredients in OMS302 for defined time intervals prior to and after surgery * No other significant eye injuries, eye conditions or general medical conditions likely to interfere with the evaluation of the study medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Change-from-Baseline in Pupil Diameter (mm) During SurgeryFrom surgery baseline (pre-incision) through surgery end (time of cortical clean-up/wound closure)The co-primary analysis of the change in pupil diameter based on the mean area under the curve (AUC) pupil diameter change from baseline. First, the AUC of the pupil diameter from surgical baseline to wound closure was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Second, the mean AUC was obtained by dividing the AUC by the total time of surgery. Third, the mean AUC of change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline pupil diameter from the mean AUC.
Mean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Ocular Pain VAS Score Within 12 Hours Postoperatively12 hours postoperativelyThe co-primary analysis of the ocular pain VAS (where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain) based on the mean area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of the ocular pain VAS during 12 hours postoperatively was calculated by the trapezoidal rule in which the hour 11 was used to represent the time-point 10-12 hour. The mean AUC was defined as the AUC divided by the number of hours with ocular pain VAS results during the first 12 hours postoperatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Moderate-to-Severe Pain (VAS Greater Than or Equal to 40) at Any Time Point During 12 Hours Postoperatively12 hours postoperativelyThe number of subjects with moderate -to-severe pain (VAS greater than or equal to 40) at any time point during 12 hours postoperatively summarized by treatment arm.
Ocular Pain-Free (VAS Equal to 0) at All Time Points During 12 Hours Postoperatively12 hours postoperativelyThe number of subjects who report ocular pain-free status (VAS equal to 0) at all time points during 12 hours postoperatively summarized by treatment arm. Subjects with missing VAS scores during the 12 hours postoperatively were considered as not being pain-free.
Ocular Pain VAS Score on Day 1One day postoperativelyVAS pain scores (where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain) after the day of surgery summarized by treatment arm and time point.
Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgerySix hours postoperativelyPhotophobia outcomes based on Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale (Numerical Rating System - NRS) at each time point.
Pupil Diameter Greater Than or Equal to 6 mm at Completion of Cortical Clean upat time of cortical clean-up (i.e., end of surgical procedure)The number of subjects with pupil diameter of at least 6 mm at the completion of cortical clean up summarized by treatment arm. The last pupil diameter was used if not available at completion of cortical clean up.
Postoperative Ocular Inflammation - Mean Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS) on Day 1One day postoperativelyPostoperative inflammation as measured using the Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS), summarized by treatment arm and time point. Ocular inflammation was evaluated by measuring the anterior chamber cell count and flare using a slit lamp biomicroscope. SOIS was calculated by adding the average of subject's anterior chamber cells and flare grades. The minimum SOIS was 0 (indicating absence of inflammation), whereas the maximum SOIS was 8. Grading was as follows: Anterior Chamber Cells: Grade None = 0/no cells; Grade Mild = +1/1-5 cells; Grade Moderate = +2/6-15 cells; Grade Severe = +3/16-30 cells; Grade Very Severe = +4/\>30 cells. Anterior Chamber Flare: Grade None = 0/no Tyndall effect; Grade Mild = +1/barely discernable Tyndall effect; Grade Moderate = +2/moderately intense Tyndall beam in anterior chamber; Grade Severe = +3/severely intense Tyndall beam; Grade Very Severe = +4/very severely intense Tyndall beam with a white and milky appearance to the aqueous
Postoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BVCA) on Day 1One day postoperativelyBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) summarized by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity log score. The reason for missing scores (e.g., subject could not read enough letters to obtain a score or refraction was not completed) was also summarized. For subjects without a score due to inability to read the ETDRS chart, the log score was imputed as 1.6 for the purpose of treatment comparisons. Subjects without a score because the manifest refraction was not completed were excluded from the analysis.
Systemic Pharmacokinetics (PK) of OMS30224 hoursSystemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of phenylephrine (PE) and ketorolac (KE) were performed in a subset of subjects. Descriptive summary statistics for area-under-the-serum-concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), and terminal phase half-life (t1/2) were to be generated if measured plasma concentrations were adequate for analysis. Descriptive statistics for pharmacokinetics were not performed as detected concentrations were low and insufficient for analysis.
Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryOne day postoperativelyPhotophobia outcomes based on Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale (Numerical Rating System - NRS) at each time point.
Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm Anytime During SurgeryIntraoperativeThe number of subjects with pupil diameter less than 6 mm at any time during surgery summarized by treatment arm.

Countries

Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OMS302
OMS302 diluted in Balanced Salt Solution and administered as irrigation solution during Intraocular Lens Replacement surgery. OMS302: OMS302 drug product will be supplied as a sterile, clear colorless liquid, free from particulates of foreign matter. Each vial contains a nominal 4.5 mL of solution containing 60.75 mM phenylephrine HCl and 11.25 mM ketorolac tromethamine formulated in a 20 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.3 +/- 0.5). For administration to patients, 4.4 mL of the drug product are added to a 500-mL bottle of commercially available BSS solution through a syringe filter, resulting in 4.0 mL of the drug product in the 500-mL bottle.
202
Placebo
Placebo diluted in Balanced Salt Solution and administered as irrigation solution during Intraocular Lens Replacement surgery. Placebo: Placebo drug product will be supplied as a sterile, clear colorless liquid, free from particulates of foreign matter. Each vial contains a nominal 4.5 mL of solution containing 20 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.3 +/- 0.5). For administration to patients, 4.4 mL of the drug product are added to a 500-mL bottle of commercially available BSS solution through a syringe filter, resulting in 4.0 mL of the drug product in the 500-mL bottle.
204
Total406

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
RandomizedAdverse Event13
Randomizedinadequate preoperative pupil dilation01
Randomizedprohibited preoperative eating10
Randomizedprohibited preoperative medication01
RandomizedWithdrawal by Subject30
Treateddeclined to return for final visit01
TreatedLost to Follow-up21
TreatedPhysician Decision01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOMS302PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
68.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Sex: Female, Male
Female
117 Participants126 Participants243 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants78 Participants163 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
118 / 202143 / 204
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 2022 / 204

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Change-from-Baseline in Pupil Diameter (mm) During Surgery

The co-primary analysis of the change in pupil diameter based on the mean area under the curve (AUC) pupil diameter change from baseline. First, the AUC of the pupil diameter from surgical baseline to wound closure was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Second, the mean AUC was obtained by dividing the AUC by the total time of surgery. Third, the mean AUC of change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline pupil diameter from the mean AUC.

Time frame: From surgery baseline (pre-incision) through surgery end (time of cortical clean-up/wound closure)

Population: Subjects with interpretable video images obtained during intraocular lens replacement (ILR) procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMS302Mean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Change-from-Baseline in Pupil Diameter (mm) During Surgery0.1 mmStandard Deviation 0.43
PlaceboMean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Change-from-Baseline in Pupil Diameter (mm) During Surgery-0.5 mmStandard Deviation 0.57
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.494, 0.686]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Mean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Ocular Pain VAS Score Within 12 Hours Postoperatively

The co-primary analysis of the ocular pain VAS (where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain) based on the mean area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of the ocular pain VAS during 12 hours postoperatively was calculated by the trapezoidal rule in which the hour 11 was used to represent the time-point 10-12 hour. The mean AUC was defined as the AUC divided by the number of hours with ocular pain VAS results during the first 12 hours postoperatively.

Time frame: 12 hours postoperatively

Population: Subjects with scores at time points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMS302Mean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Ocular Pain VAS Score Within 12 Hours Postoperatively4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.75
PlaceboMean Area Under the Curve Analysis of Ocular Pain VAS Score Within 12 Hours Postoperatively8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.19
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-6.917, -2.244]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Moderate-to-Severe Pain (VAS Greater Than or Equal to 40) at Any Time Point During 12 Hours Postoperatively

The number of subjects with moderate -to-severe pain (VAS greater than or equal to 40) at any time point during 12 hours postoperatively summarized by treatment arm.

Time frame: 12 hours postoperatively

Population: Subjects with VAS scores at time points.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Moderate-to-Severe Pain (VAS Greater Than or Equal to 40) at Any Time Point During 12 Hours Postoperatively16 participants
PlaceboModerate-to-Severe Pain (VAS Greater Than or Equal to 40) at Any Time Point During 12 Hours Postoperatively27 participants
p-value: 0.076Chi-squared
Secondary

Ocular Pain-Free (VAS Equal to 0) at All Time Points During 12 Hours Postoperatively

The number of subjects who report ocular pain-free status (VAS equal to 0) at all time points during 12 hours postoperatively summarized by treatment arm. Subjects with missing VAS scores during the 12 hours postoperatively were considered as not being pain-free.

Time frame: 12 hours postoperatively

Population: Subjects with scores at time points.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Ocular Pain-Free (VAS Equal to 0) at All Time Points During 12 Hours Postoperatively56 participants
PlaceboOcular Pain-Free (VAS Equal to 0) at All Time Points During 12 Hours Postoperatively41 participants
p-value: 0.0806Chi-squared
Secondary

Ocular Pain VAS Score on Day 1

VAS pain scores (where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain) after the day of surgery summarized by treatment arm and time point.

Time frame: One day postoperatively

Population: Subjects with score at time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMS302Ocular Pain VAS Score on Day 15.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
PlaceboOcular Pain VAS Score on Day 112.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
p-value: 0.0002Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-Surgery

Photophobia outcomes based on Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale (Numerical Rating System - NRS) at each time point.

Time frame: One day postoperatively

Population: Subjects with scores at time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryNone119 participants
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryModerate16 participants
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryMild63 participants
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgerySevere4 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryMild63 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryNone95 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgerySevere9 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 1 Day Post-SurgeryModerate37 participants
p-value: 0.006Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-Surgery

Photophobia outcomes based on Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale (Numerical Rating System - NRS) at each time point.

Time frame: Six hours postoperatively

Population: Subjects with scores at time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgeryNone140 participants
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgeryMild51 participants
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgeryModerate8 participants
OMS302Ocular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgerySevere1 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgerySevere3 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgeryNone128 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgeryModerate13 participants
PlaceboOcular Symptoms Using Numerical Rating System (NRS) - Photophobia 6 Hours Post-SurgeryMild58 participants
p-value: 0.3923Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Postoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BVCA) on Day 1

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) summarized by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity log score. The reason for missing scores (e.g., subject could not read enough letters to obtain a score or refraction was not completed) was also summarized. For subjects without a score due to inability to read the ETDRS chart, the log score was imputed as 1.6 for the purpose of treatment comparisons. Subjects without a score because the manifest refraction was not completed were excluded from the analysis.

Time frame: One day postoperatively

Population: Subjects with score at time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMS302Postoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BVCA) on Day 10.1 Log scoreStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboPostoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BVCA) on Day 10.1 Log scoreStandard Deviation 0.18
p-value: 0.2361Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Postoperative Ocular Inflammation - Mean Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS) on Day 1

Postoperative inflammation as measured using the Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS), summarized by treatment arm and time point. Ocular inflammation was evaluated by measuring the anterior chamber cell count and flare using a slit lamp biomicroscope. SOIS was calculated by adding the average of subject's anterior chamber cells and flare grades. The minimum SOIS was 0 (indicating absence of inflammation), whereas the maximum SOIS was 8. Grading was as follows: Anterior Chamber Cells: Grade None = 0/no cells; Grade Mild = +1/1-5 cells; Grade Moderate = +2/6-15 cells; Grade Severe = +3/16-30 cells; Grade Very Severe = +4/\>30 cells. Anterior Chamber Flare: Grade None = 0/no Tyndall effect; Grade Mild = +1/barely discernable Tyndall effect; Grade Moderate = +2/moderately intense Tyndall beam in anterior chamber; Grade Severe = +3/severely intense Tyndall beam; Grade Very Severe = +4/very severely intense Tyndall beam with a white and milky appearance to the aqueous

Time frame: One day postoperatively

Population: Subjects with scores at time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMS302Postoperative Ocular Inflammation - Mean Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS) on Day 12.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboPostoperative Ocular Inflammation - Mean Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS) on Day 12.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: 0.3286Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Pupil Diameter Greater Than or Equal to 6 mm at Completion of Cortical Clean up

The number of subjects with pupil diameter of at least 6 mm at the completion of cortical clean up summarized by treatment arm. The last pupil diameter was used if not available at completion of cortical clean up.

Time frame: at time of cortical clean-up (i.e., end of surgical procedure)

Population: Subjects with interpretable video images obtained during ILR procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Pupil Diameter Greater Than or Equal to 6 mm at Completion of Cortical Clean up187 participants
PlaceboPupil Diameter Greater Than or Equal to 6 mm at Completion of Cortical Clean up154 participants
p-value: 0.0001Chi-squared
Secondary

Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm Anytime During Surgery

The number of subjects with pupil diameter less than 6 mm at any time during surgery summarized by treatment arm.

Time frame: Intraoperative

Population: Subjects with interpretable video images obtained during ILR procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm Anytime During Surgery18 participants
PlaceboPupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm Anytime During Surgery76 participants
p-value: 0.0001Chi-squared
Secondary

Systemic Pharmacokinetics (PK) of OMS302

Systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of phenylephrine (PE) and ketorolac (KE) were performed in a subset of subjects. Descriptive summary statistics for area-under-the-serum-concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), and terminal phase half-life (t1/2) were to be generated if measured plasma concentrations were adequate for analysis. Descriptive statistics for pharmacokinetics were not performed as detected concentrations were low and insufficient for analysis.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Subset of subjects randomized to OMS302 treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OMS302Systemic Pharmacokinetics (PK) of OMS302Subjects with detectable PE1 participants
OMS302Systemic Pharmacokinetics (PK) of OMS302Subjects with detectable KE10 participants
PlaceboSystemic Pharmacokinetics (PK) of OMS302Subjects with detectable PE0 participants
PlaceboSystemic Pharmacokinetics (PK) of OMS302Subjects with detectable KE1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026