Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of Juvéderm® Volbella With Lidocaine Versus Restylane-L® for Lip Volume Enhancement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01579305
Enrollment
285
Registered
2012-04-17
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2019-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lip Volume Enhancement

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is evaluate lip fullness 3 months following treatment with Juvéderm® Volbella with Lidocaine or Restylane-L®

Interventions

DEVICEJuvéderm® Volbella with Lidocaine

Up to 4.0 mL at the discretion of the Investigator to achieve optimal results

Up to 4.0 mL at the discretion of the Investigator to achieve optimal results

Sponsors

Allergan Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Desire enhancement of his/her vermilion borders and/or vermilion mucosa 2. Have a baseline score of Minimal or Mild, as assessed by the Investigator, according to the 5-point LFS (Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked, Very Marked) 3. Have established a realistic Lip Fullness treatment goal that the Investigator agrees is achievable

Exclusion criteria

1. Have undergone cosmetic facial, lip or perioral procedures \[e.g., face-lift, or other surgeries, which may alter the appearance of the lips or perioral area (laser, photomodulation, intense pulsed light, radio frequency, dermabrasion, moderate or greater depth chemical peel, or other ablative procedures), tissue augmentation with dermal fillers or fat injections, or mesotherapy\] anywhere in the face or neck, or Botox® Cosmetic injections in the lower face (below the orbital rim), within 6 months prior to entry in the study or be planning to undergo any of these procedures at any time during the study. NOTE: Prior treatment with HA fillers and/or collagen is allowed, provided the treatment was administered more than 6 months prior to study entry 2. Have ever received semi-permanent fillers or permanent facial implants, e.g., calcium hydroxyapatite, L-polylactic acid, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), silicone, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) anywhere in the lips, or be planning to be implanted with any of these products at any time during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Month 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment3 monthsThe primary effectiveness variable is the responder rate (percentage of subjects who show ≥ 1-point improvement on the 5-point Lip Fullness Scale (Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked, Very Marked) compared to baseline assessment, as determined by Independent Central Reviewer evaluation of 3D photographic images).

Countries

France, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Enrollment was defined as having signed the IRB-approved Informed Consent Form. Prior to randomization, 4 subjects were excluded as screen fails, leaving an Intent-to-Treat population of 281 subjects.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects Randomized to Receive VOLBELLA®139
Subjects Randomized to Receive Restylane-L®141
Total280

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects Randomized to Receive Restylane-L®TotalSubjects Randomized to Receive VOLBELLA®
Age, Continuous48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61
47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
Region of Enrollment
France
49 participants97 participants48 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
92 participants183 participants91 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
139 Participants274 Participants135 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 13926 / 141
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1391 / 141

Outcome results

Primary

Month 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment

The primary effectiveness variable is the responder rate (percentage of subjects who show ≥ 1-point improvement on the 5-point Lip Fullness Scale (Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked, Very Marked) compared to baseline assessment, as determined by Independent Central Reviewer evaluation of 3D photographic images).

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Per-protocol population (all subjects who are randomized, received at least 1 study treatment, and have no protocol deviations that affect the primary effectiveness endpoint)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Randomized to Receive VOLBELLA® and TreatedMonth 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment34.1 Percentage of subjects
Subjects Randomized to Receive Restylane-L® and TreatedMonth 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment29.3 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that VOLBELLA® is inferior to Restylane-L® in terms of responder rate at Month 3, and the alternative hypothesis is that VOLBELLA® is inferior to Restylane-L® in terms of responder rate at Month 3 with 15% pre-defined non-inferiority margin. To test the null hypothesis, a difference in responder rates of these products (VOLBELLA® - Restylane-L®) at Month 3 and a 1-sided 97.5% Wald confidence interval for the difference is calculated.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026