Skip to content

Safety and Tolerability of AGN-199201 in Patients With Erythema Associated With Rosacea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01579084
Enrollment
64
Registered
2012-04-17
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2019-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erythema, Rosacea

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of AGN-199201 for the treatment of erythema associated with rosacea.

Interventions

DRUGAGN-199201 Formulation A

AGN-199201 Formulation A applied to the face as per protocol twice daily.

DRUGAGN-199201 Formulation B

AGN-199201 Formulation B applied to the face as per protocol twice daily.

DRUGAGN-199201 Formulation C

AGN-199201 Formulation C applied to the face as per protocol twice daily.

AGN-199201 vehicle (placebo) applied to the face as per protocol twice daily.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* facial erythema associated with rosacea on both sides of the face

Exclusion criteria

* Laser light-source or other energy based therapy in the last 6 months * Excessive hair around the treatment area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline in Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 1Baseline, Day 1-hour 6The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the CEA score and at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the SSA score at Day 1. The investigator evaluated the severity of the participant's erythema (redness of the skin) as measured by the CEA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness and 4=severe erythema, fiery redness. The participant assessed the severity of their erythema as measured by the SSA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear of unwanted redness; 1=nearly clear of unwanted redness; 2=somewhat more redness than I prefer; 3=more redness than I prefer and 4=completely unacceptable redness.
Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 5Baseline, Day 5-hour 6The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the CEA score and at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the SSA score at Day 5. The investigator evaluated the severity of the participant's erythema (redness of the skin) as measured by the CEA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness and 4=severe erythema, fiery redness. The participant assessed the severity of their erythema as measured by the SSA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear of unwanted redness; 1=nearly clear of unwanted redness; 2=somewhat more redness than I prefer; 3=more redness than I prefer and 4=completely unacceptable redness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEABaseline, Day 1-hour 6, Day 5-hour 6The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the CEA score at Day 1 and Day 5. The investigator evaluated the severity of the participant's erythema (redness of the skin) as measured by the CEA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness and 4=severe erythema, fiery redness.
Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSABaseline, Day1-hour 6, Day 5-hour 6The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the SSA score at Day 1 and Day 5. The participant assessed the severity of their erythema as measured by the SSA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear of unwanted redness; 1=nearly clear of unwanted redness; 2=somewhat more redness than I prefer; 3=more redness than I prefer and 4=completely unacceptable redness.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AGN-199201 Formulation A and B
AGN-199201 Formulation A applied to one side of the face and Formulation B applied to the other side of the face twice daily for 5 days.
8
AGN-199201 Formulation B and C
AGN-199201 Formulation B applied to one side of the face and Formulation C applied to the other side of the face twice daily for 5 days.
8
AGN-199201 Formulation C and A
AGN-199201 Formulation C applied to one side of the face and Formulation A applied to the other side of the face twice daily for 5 days.
8
AGN-199201 Formulation A and Vehicle
AGN-199201 Formulation A applied to one side of the face and AGN-199201 Vehicle applied to the other side of the face twice daily for 5 days.
8
AGN-199201 Formulation B and Vehicle
AGN-199201 Formulation B applied to one side of the face and AGN-199201 Vehicle applied to the other side of the face twice daily for 5 days.
8
AGN-199201 Formulation C and Vehicle
AGN-199201 Formulation C applied to one side of the face and AGN-199201 Vehicle applied to the other side of the face twice daily for 5 days.
8
AGN-199201 Formulation A
AGN-199201 Formulation A applied to both sides of the face twice daily for 5 days.
4
AGN-199201 Formulation B
AGN-199201 Formulation B applied to both sides of the face twice daily for 5 days.
4
AGN-199201 Formulation C
AGN-199201 Formulation C applied to both sides of the face twice daily for 5 days.
4
AGN-199201 Vehicle
AGN-199201 Vehicle (Placebo) applied to both sides of the face twice daily for 5 days.
4
Total64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAGN-199201 Formulation A and BAGN-199201 Formulation B and CAGN-199201 Formulation C and AAGN-199201 Formulation A and VehicleAGN-199201 Formulation B and VehicleAGN-199201 Formulation C and VehicleAGN-199201 Formulation AAGN-199201 Formulation BAGN-199201 Formulation CAGN-199201 Vehicle
Age, Customized
45 to 65 years
50 Participants7 Participants6 Participants6 Participants4 Participants8 Participants7 Participants3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Customized
< 45 years
10 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
> 65 years
4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants5 Participants8 Participants6 Participants7 Participants5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 85 / 83 / 86 / 86 / 84 / 83 / 43 / 43 / 42 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 40 / 40 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline in Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 1

The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the CEA score and at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the SSA score at Day 1. The investigator evaluated the severity of the participant's erythema (redness of the skin) as measured by the CEA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness and 4=severe erythema, fiery redness. The participant assessed the severity of their erythema as measured by the SSA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear of unwanted redness; 1=nearly clear of unwanted redness; 2=somewhat more redness than I prefer; 3=more redness than I prefer and 4=completely unacceptable redness.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1-hour 6

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized patients who received study medication and who had measurements at Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement for both CEA and SSA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AGN-199201 Formulation APercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline in Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 115.6 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation BPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline in Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 121.9 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation CPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline in Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 128.1 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 VehiclePercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline in Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 10.0 Percentage of responders
Primary

Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 5

The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the CEA score and at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the SSA score at Day 5. The investigator evaluated the severity of the participant's erythema (redness of the skin) as measured by the CEA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness and 4=severe erythema, fiery redness. The participant assessed the severity of their erythema as measured by the SSA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear of unwanted redness; 1=nearly clear of unwanted redness; 2=somewhat more redness than I prefer; 3=more redness than I prefer and 4=completely unacceptable redness.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 5-hour 6

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized patients who received study medication and who had measurements at Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement for both CEA and SSA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AGN-199201 Formulation APercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 56.3 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation BPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 56.5 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation CPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 56.5 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 VehiclePercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject's Self Assessment (SSA) at Day 53.1 Percentage of responders
Secondary

Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEA

The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the CEA score at Day 1 and Day 5. The investigator evaluated the severity of the participant's erythema (redness of the skin) as measured by the CEA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness and 4=severe erythema, fiery redness.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1-hour 6, Day 5-hour 6

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized patients who received study medication and who had measurements at Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement for both CEA and SSA.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AGN-199201 Formulation APercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 1-hour 634.4 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation APercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)15.6 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation BPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)6.5 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation BPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 1-hour 634.4 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation CPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 1-hour 640.6 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation CPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)6.5 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 VehiclePercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 1-hour 60.0 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 VehiclePercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on CEADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)6.3 Percentage of responders
Secondary

Percentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSA

The percentage of responders was determined by facial sides with at least a 2-grade decrease from Baseline (Improvement) in the SSA score at Day 1 and Day 5. The participant assessed the severity of their erythema as measured by the SSA using a 5-point scale where 0=clear of unwanted redness; 1=nearly clear of unwanted redness; 2=somewhat more redness than I prefer; 3=more redness than I prefer and 4=completely unacceptable redness.

Time frame: Baseline, Day1-hour 6, Day 5-hour 6

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized patients who received study medication and who had measurements at Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement for both CEA and SSA.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AGN-199201 Formulation APercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay1-hour 631.3 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation APercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)34.4 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation BPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)41.9 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation BPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay1-hour 646.9 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation CPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay1-hour 656.3 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 Formulation CPercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)58.1 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 VehiclePercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay1-hour 63.1 Percentage of responders
AGN-199201 VehiclePercentage of Responders With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on SSADay 5-hour 6 (Facial Sides n=32,31,31,32)28.1 Percentage of responders

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026