Skip to content

Feasibility Study for Evaluating the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

A Feasibility Study: An Evaluation of the Effect of Long-Term Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01578642
Enrollment
24
Registered
2012-04-17
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Keywords

GERD, LES Pressure, Electrical Stimulation

Brief summary

The EndoStim Stimulation System is an investigational device intended to improve the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting tone and restore LES function in individuals suffering with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Detailed description

EndoStim is developing an investigational medical device specifically designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the LES and has completed two clinical feasibility studies using the EndoStim stimulation system in fifteen subjects. Acute electrical stimulation resulted in significant LES pressure with no adverse effects reported. Results of these studies are promising and warrant additional clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of EndoStim stimulation system to treat GERD over time. In this study, EndoStim proposes using a fully implantable system. Results of this study are expected to provide confirmation of safety of long-term LES stimulation and may provide long term clinical benefit for GERD patients.

Interventions

The EndoStim LES Stimulation System comprises three components: an electrical stimulation lead an implantable pulse generator (IPG) and an external programmer.

Sponsors

EndoStim Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is between 21 - 65 years of age. * Subject has a history of heartburn, regurgitation or both for \> 6 months prompting physician recommendation of continual daily use of PPI before study entry. * Baseline GERD-HRQL heartburn score of ≥ 20 off PPI assessed during the run-in phase. * Subject has an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II (or comparable local classification if any). * Subject has demonstrated satisfactory symptomatic response to a previous course of GERD therapy (≥ 2 weeks); GERD HRQL heartburn score improvement of ≥ 10 on therapy as assessed during the run in phase. * Subject has exhibited excessive lower esophageal acid exposure during 24-hour pH-metry off antisecretory therapy performed within 6 months of enrollment; pH \< 4 for \> 5% of total or \> 3% of supine time. * Subject has a resting LES end expiratory pressure \> 5mm Hg and \< 15 mm Hg on a high resolution manometry within 6 months of enrollment. * Subject has esophagitis ≤ Grade C (LA classification) on upper endoscopy within 6 months of enrollment. * Subject has esophageal body contraction amplitude \> 30 mmHg for \> 70% of swallows and \> 50% peristaltic contractions on high resolution manometry. * Subject has signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has non-GERD esophageal motility disorders. * Subject has gastroparesis. * Subject has significant multisystem diseases. * Subject has scleroderma requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years . * Subject has dermatomyositis requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years. * Subject has Calcinosis-Raynaud's-esophaguschlerodactyly syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years. * Subject has Sjogren's Syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years. * Subject has Sharp's Syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years. * Subject has persistent esophagitis greater than LA grade C. * Subject has Barrett's epithelium (\> M2; \>C1) or any dysplasia. * Subject has a hiatus hernia larger than 3 cm. * Subject has a body mass Index greater than 35 kg/m2 . * Subject has Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Subject has uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) defined as HbA1c \>9.5 in the previous 6 months, or has T2DM for \> 10 years. * Subject has an autoimmune disorder requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years. * Subject has suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer. * Subject has esophageal or gastric varices. * Subject has significant cardiac arrhythmia or ectopy or significant cardiovascular disease. * Subject has an existing implanted electrical stimulator (e.g., pacemaker). * Subject requires chronic anticoagulant therapy. * Subject has dysphagia or esophageal peptic structure, excluding Schatzki's ring. * Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the trial period. * Subject is currently enrolled in other potentially confounding research. * Subject has any condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the trial. * History of any malignancy in the last 2 years * History of previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including nissen fundoplication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Safety Endpoint3 monthsSafety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 12-week (3 month) follow-up. Included in this assessment will be the proportion of subjects with any of the following outcomes between device implant and completion of the Week 12 evaluation: (1) death, or (2) medical morbidity, including myocardial infarction, pneumonia, wound infection, or perforation requiring hospitalization.
Primary Endpoint: FunctionalityUp to 3 monthsFunctionality of the EndoStim system will be assessed by the ability of the device to initiate stimulation as programmed and to accurately detect the patient's posture. Indication of device detection when the patient is lying horizontally and when standing up will be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GERD-HRQL3 monthsImprovement in GERD-HRQL with LES stimulation at the 12-weeks (3 months) follow-up compared to baseline
GERD Symptoms3 monthsChanges in GERD symptoms as measured by the patient daily symptom-diary as well as the impact of GERD symptoms on quality of life as measured by SF-12 will be compared between baseline assessments and post-implant measures at 12 weeks (3 months).
Lower Esophageal Measures3 monthsThe baseline LES end expiratory pressure and the on-stimulation LES end expiratory pressure at 3 months
Esophageal Acid Exposure3 monthsTotal fractional esophageal acid exposure time with pH \< 4.0. The data on baseline esophageal acid exposure off-therapy, prior to surgical implant of the stimulator and on-stimulation at 12 weeks (3 months) post-implant

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026