Skip to content

Daily Use of Lipikar Balm AP From Birth in Infants at High Risk of Developing Atopic Dermatitis

Randomized, Multicentric, Controlled Study on the Daily Use of Lipikar Balm AP From Birth in Infants at High Risk of Developing Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01577628
Enrollment
2
Registered
2012-04-16
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2016-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma, Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema, Food Allergies

Keywords

Dermatitis, Eczema, Skin diseases, Skin barrier, Prevention, Infant, Moisturizer, Emollient, Asthma, Food allergy, Allergic rhinitis

Brief summary

There is a lack of prospective scientific data on the regular use of moisturizers in patients at risk of developing atopic dermatitis. Although generally accepted and widely used for secondary prevention, emollients have not been studied as a primary prevention strategy. Strategies previously studied for the prevention of atopic dermatitis include maternal and child's dietary manipulations, allergens avoidance, delay of food introduction, exclusive breastfeeding and probiotic supplementation. Despite years of research, none of those strategies yielded to strong evidence of a protective effect. There is therefore a need to explore novel strategies. There is a need to compare the cumulative incidence rate of atopic dermatitis in newborns using a standard bathing and moisturizing routine with a good moisturizer to a non interventional group. This 2-year study will recruit approximately four hundred and sixty (460) pregnant women with a first degree relative of the child to be born who currently has (or previously had) a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in order to study approximately 200 eligible newborns in each of the two study groups at the beginning of the study. Pregnant women will be randomized (1:1) to either daily use of the moisturizer Lipikar Balm AP (applied to their infant) starting from birth (Group 1) immediately after bathing or to no intervention (Group 2).

Detailed description

To be eligible, pregnant women must be at least 16 weeks pregnant. Expecting mothers (or the father of the infant to be born) or related sibling of the child to be born must meet or previously have met criteria for atopic dermatitis. In addition, one of the parents or sibling of the child to be born must suffer from allergic rhinitis or asthma. Pregnant women will be randomized at screening and their infant will be seen at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months (1 year) and 24 months (2 years) after birth. Women randomized to group 1 will be requested to use the same body cleanser (Lipikar Syndet) and to apply Lipikar Balm AP to their child once daily immediately after bathing on a well blotted skin (within 3 minutes of bathing) to the entire body (including the face) from birth, while women randomized to group 2 will be in a non-interventional control group. The presence of atopic dermatitis (using Hanifin's criteria(1)) and study products use will be assessed at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after birth. A buccal smear will be sampled from all infants at 1 month after birth for the genotyping of filaggrin (FLG) gene. In addition, adverse events evaluation and parent questioning on infants development of food allergies and asthma will be performed at 1 month, 3 months (telephone visit), 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after birth. Infants will be followed for a total of two years after birth. Lipikar Balm AP is a commonly used cosmetic moisturizer commercially available in many countries including Canada. This moisturizer is recommended for extreme dryness and atopy-prone skin in babies, children and adults. It contains shea butter, paraffin, waxes and vegetable oils. The high content in shea butter and the fraction chosen showed a greater expression of constitutive ceramids forming the barrier function of the skin (data on file at La Roche-Posay).

Interventions

DRUGLipikar Balm AP

Daily application of Lipikar Balm AP starting at birth

Sponsors

Innovaderm Research Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Cosmetique Active International
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women 18 years of age or older at the time of consent * At least 16 weeks pregnant * Women with a high risk of having a child with atopic dermatitis defined as having one parent or related sibling of the child to be born who currently (or previously) suffers from atopic dermatitis and who also suffers from asthma or allergic rhinitis * Be willing to use the body cleanser Lipikar Syndet and to apply Lipikar Balm AP (if randomized to group 1) every day from birth for 2 years * Capable of giving informed consent and the consent must be obtained prior to any study related procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Preterm birth defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation * Major congenital anomaly at birth * Presence of significant dermatitis at birth * Any medical problem at birth that would prevent the daily use of Lipikar Syndet and/or Lipikar Balm AP (regardless of the group the subject was randomized to) or would prevent evaluation of the skin for the presence of atopic dermatitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Infants Who Develop Atopic Dermatitis2 yearsProportion of infants who develop atopic dermatitis at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Infants Who Develop a Food Allergy2 yearsProportion of infants who develop a food allergy at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Influence of the Presence of Mutation in the Filaggrin Gene on the Proportion of Infants Who Develop Atopic Dermatitis2 yearsInfluence of the presence of mutation in the filaggrin gene on the proportion of infants who develop atopic dermatitis at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Influence of the Presence of Mutation in the Filaggrin Gene on the Proportion of Infants Who Develop Asthma2 yearsInfluence of the presence of mutation in the filaggrin gene on the proportion of infants who develop asthma at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Influence of the Presence of Mutation in the Filaggrin Gene on the Proportion of Infants Who Develop a Food Allergy2 yearsInfluence of the presence of mutation in the filaggrin gene on the proportion of infants who develop a food allergy at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Proportion of Infants Who Develop Asthma2 yearsProportion of infants who develop asthma at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Time of Onset of Food Allergy in Infants2 yearsTime of onset of food allergy in infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Adverse Events (AEs) Collection2 yearsAdverse events (Skin AEs, asthma, food allergies, allergic rhinitis and any AE related to Lipikar Syndet, Lipikar Balm AP (group 1) or any other moisturizer application (group 2) will be collected.
Time of Onset of Atopic Dermatitis2 yearsTime of onset of atopic dermatitis in infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group
Time of Onset of Asthma in Infants2 yearsTime of onset of asthma in infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1: Lipikar Balm AP
Daily application of Lipikar Balm AP starting at birth Lipikar Balm AP: Daily application of Lipikar Balm AP starting at birth
0
Group 2: No Intervention Control Group
Subjects may use a moisturizer if they wish to but no instruction or product is provided
0
Total0

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
— Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
— Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
— participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
— participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
— Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Infants Who Develop Atopic Dermatitis

Proportion of infants who develop atopic dermatitis at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Adverse Events (AEs) Collection

Adverse events (Skin AEs, asthma, food allergies, allergic rhinitis and any AE related to Lipikar Syndet, Lipikar Balm AP (group 1) or any other moisturizer application (group 2) will be collected.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Influence of the Presence of Mutation in the Filaggrin Gene on the Proportion of Infants Who Develop a Food Allergy

Influence of the presence of mutation in the filaggrin gene on the proportion of infants who develop a food allergy at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Influence of the Presence of Mutation in the Filaggrin Gene on the Proportion of Infants Who Develop Asthma

Influence of the presence of mutation in the filaggrin gene on the proportion of infants who develop asthma at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Influence of the Presence of Mutation in the Filaggrin Gene on the Proportion of Infants Who Develop Atopic Dermatitis

Influence of the presence of mutation in the filaggrin gene on the proportion of infants who develop atopic dermatitis at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Proportion of Infants Who Develop a Food Allergy

Proportion of infants who develop a food allergy at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Proportion of Infants Who Develop Asthma

Proportion of infants who develop asthma at two years for infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Time of Onset of Asthma in Infants

Time of onset of asthma in infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Time of Onset of Atopic Dermatitis

Time of onset of atopic dermatitis in infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Secondary

Time of Onset of Food Allergy in Infants

Time of onset of food allergy in infants randomized to Lipikar Balm AP as compared to infants randomized to the no intervention control group

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Subjects were not randomized to either treatment prior to study termination and therefore no data was collected for this Outcome Measure

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026