Skip to content

In Children, Does Using a Synera Patch Decrease Pain When Injecting Propofol at Anesthesia Induction?

In Children, Does the Use of Synera Patch for Local Analgesia Before Vascular Access Reduce Pain Associated With Propofol Injection for Anesthesia Induction?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01576770
Acronym
Synera patch
Enrollment
80
Registered
2012-04-12
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2012-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain on Propofol IV Injection

Keywords

propofol, Pain, Synera Patch, Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride topical anesthetic

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the Synera Patch (lidocaine/tetracaine patch), used to numb the skin before IV placement, is effective in reducing pain associated with propofol IV administration when inducing general anesthesia, compared to Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride topical anesthetic skin refrigerant.

Detailed description

Commonly, anesthesiologists inject Propofol, a sleeping medication, intravenously to induce general anesthesia. Propofol injection is associated with pain that can be severe. The investigators also place a lidocaine/tetracaine skin patch (Synera) to decrease pain associated with IV placement. Because the local anesthetics of the Synera patch diffuse deep underneath the skin, in this study the investigators would like to evaluate whether the application of Synera Patch can decrease the pain associated with propofol injection. Children will be randomized to receive either the patch or the Ethyl Chloride before the IV placement. A total of 33 patients will be enrolled in each group.

Interventions

DEVICElidocaine/tetracaine transdermal patch (NDC 43469-864-01)

70 mg lidocaine / 70 mg tetracaine

Spray is to be applied topically to skin (dorsum of the hand for study purposes)until it turns white or for up to 10 seconds.

Sponsors

ZARS Pharma Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy, outpatient children, 6-17 years old * American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Classification rating of 1 or 2 * Elective procedure requiring general anesthesia at Memorial Herman Hospital, The Medical Center, Houston, Texas

Exclusion criteria

* Skin disease or infection (on dorsum of hands) * Allergy to lidocaine or tetracaine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of children in each group who do not feel pain or have mild pain on propofol injection.Within one hour, plus or minus one half hourThe primary outcome variable is the success/failure of therapy. The therapy is considered a success if a child feels no pain OR has mild pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityWithin one hour, plus or minus one half hourA blinded independent observer and a blinded anesthesiologist will rate pain on propofol injection according to a pain scale: 1. \- no pain 2. \- mild pain (associated with facial expression of pain) 3. \- moderate pain (pulling/withdrawal of the arm) 4. \- severe pain (screaming)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSamia N Khalil, M.D.
samia.n.khalil@uth.tmc.edu713.500.6242
Backup ContactMohammed Ali, M.D.
mohammed.ali@uth.tmc.edu713.500.6194

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026