Skip to content

An Extension Study to WA19977 in Patients With Active Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Long-term, Interventional, Open Label Extension Study Evaluating the Safety of Tocilizumab Treatment in Patients With Polyarticular-course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis From Poland and Russia Who Completed the Global, Multinational Trial (WA19977).

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01575769
Enrollment
41
Registered
2012-04-11
Start date
2012-01-19
Completion date
2013-12-03
Last updated
2018-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Brief summary

This long-term, interventional, open-label extension study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients from Poland and Russia with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis who completed the WA19977 study. Patients will receive RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is 104 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGRoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab)

Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 104 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who completed 104 weeks of study WA19977 with at least a JIA ACR30 clinical response to RoActemra/Actemra and no serious adverse event or adverse event * Written informed consent obtained from patient if patient is 18 years of age and older, or if under the age of 18 years from parents or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

* Patient did not benefit from RoActemra/Actemra therapy in study WA19977 * Treatment with any investigational drug since the last administration of study drug in the core study WA19977 * Patients developed any other autoimmune rheumatic disease other than the permitted JIA subsets * Any significant medical or surgical condition that would jeopardize patient's safety * Current serious uncontrolled concomitant disease or infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline to 12 weeks after last actual study medication (up to 101 weeks)AE: unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with use of treatment, regardless of treatment relation. Pre-existing conditions that worsened and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in change in treatment or discontinuation from treatment were reported as AEs. Serious AE: resulted in death, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically significant. Severe AE: AE that caused inability to work or perform normal daily activity. AEs of special interest: Serious infections (including opportunistic infections), Myocardial infarction/Acute coronary syndrome, Gastrointestinal perforations and related AE, Malignant neoplasms, Anaphylaxis event, Demyelination-related events, Stroke, Spontaneous or serious bleeding, Serious/medically significant hepatic events. Any AE included serious and non-serious AE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)JIA ACR50 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 50% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: PGA of disease activity using VAS from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); PtGA of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and ESR.
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)JIA ACR70 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 70% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: PGA of disease activity using VAS from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); PtGA of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and ESR
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)JIA ACR90 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 90% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: PGA of disease activity using VAS from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); PtGA of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and ESR.
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)Criteria for Inactive Disease: 1) No joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both), 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 3) Normal ESR (less than \[\<\] 20 millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]), and 4) PGA of disease activity using VAS indicated no disease activity (where no disease activity is considered to be a score less than or equal to \[≤\]10 mm on a 100 mm VAS where left end of line 0 \[inactive arthritis\] to right end of line 100 \[very active arthritis\]).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)Clinical remission: inactive disease for minimum of 6 continuous months while on medication (Level 1); off oral corticosteroid medications but still on tocilizumab (Level 2); off both methotrexate and oral corticosteroids but still on tocilizumab (Level 3); or off all anti-arthritis medications-oral corticosteroids, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs but still on tocilizumab (Level 4). Inactive disease: No joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA; Normal ESR (\<20 mm/hour); PGA of disease activity indicated no disease activity (score ≤10 mm on a 100 mm VAS where 0 \[inactive arthritis\] and 100 \[very active arthritis\]). Overall percentage of participants with clinical remission (any level) are reported.
Change From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)Joint with active arthritis was defined as a joint with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both.
Change From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement is 67 and these were defined as those with 'limitation of motion'.
Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The physician provides a rating of the participant's arthritis disease activity on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale. The extreme left end of the line represents 'arthritis inactive' (ie, symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end represents 'arthritis very active'. A higher score indicates more disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The participant or parent/guardian, as appropriate, provides a rating of the participant's well-being on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale. The extreme left end of the line represents 'very well' (ie, symptom-free and no arthritis disease activity) and the extreme right end represents 'very poor' (ie, maximum arthritis disease activity). A higher score indicates poorer well-being. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow UpBaseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)JIA ACR30 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 30% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: Physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); Patient/parent global assessment (PtGA) of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).
Percentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 4 possible responses to each question (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do). A domain score is the highest score in that domain. To calculate the overall score, the participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score and ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A higher score indicates less ability. A minimally important improvement was defined as at least a 0.13 improvement in CHAQ-DI score from baseline.
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Activity component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Arising component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Dressing and Grooming component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Eating component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Grip component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Hygiene component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Reach component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Walking component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).
Absolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 4 possible responses to each question (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do). A domain score is the highest score in that domain. To calculate the overall score, the participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score and ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A higher score indicates less ability.

Countries

Poland, Russia

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed Visit 33 (Week 104) of the core study WA19977 (NCT00988221) with at least juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 clinical response were eligible to continue the study therapy within this long-term extension study in Russia and Poland.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab
Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg via IV infusion, once every 4 weeks for up to 104 weeks or until tocilizumab became commercially available, whichever occurred first.
41
Total41

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab
Age, Continuous12.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.45
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AE: unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with use of treatment, regardless of treatment relation. Pre-existing conditions that worsened and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in change in treatment or discontinuation from treatment were reported as AEs. Serious AE: resulted in death, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically significant. Severe AE: AE that caused inability to work or perform normal daily activity. AEs of special interest: Serious infections (including opportunistic infections), Myocardial infarction/Acute coronary syndrome, Gastrointestinal perforations and related AE, Malignant neoplasms, Anaphylaxis event, Demyelination-related events, Stroke, Spontaneous or serious bleeding, Serious/medically significant hepatic events. Any AE included serious and non-serious AE.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks after last actual study medication (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Life Threatening AEs0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AEs56.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Treatment Related AEs29.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAEs7.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Severe AEs2.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AEs of Special Interest0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE Leading to Dosage Modification/Interruption22.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Withdrawal Due to AEs2.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Withdrawal Due to SAEs2.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Withdrawal Due to AEs of Special Interest0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Absolute C-Reactive Protein Levels

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 40 (n=31)1.2562 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 2.4944
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 44 (n=26)1.1710 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.96013
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 48 (n=22)1.2382 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.98754
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 52 (n=22)1.2019 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.71587
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsBaseline (n=40)0.9468 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 4.11395
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 4 (n=39)0.9755 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.71814
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 8 (n=41)1.8995 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 6.17464
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 12 (n=41)1.7157 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 3.07714
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 16 (n=41)2.4115 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 8.71986
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 20 (n=39)0.9706 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 2.67299
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 24 (n=41)1.4893 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 3.24038
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 28 (n=40)2.2320 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 5.51994
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 32 (n=39)2.1713 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 7.09086
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 36 (n=35)1.6507 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 4.81621
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 56 (n=18)3.9651 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 12.83795
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 60 (n=17)2.6449 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 8.93648
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 64 (n=15)0.6341 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.40213
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 68 (n=11)0.5210 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.49015
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 72 (n=10)1.5263 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.97617
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 76 (n=8)2.0304 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 2.49171
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 80 (n=7)1.4975 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 2.3968
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 84 (n=7)11.4459 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 25.926
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 88 (n=3)0.0704 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 0.06935
TocilizumabAbsolute C-Reactive Protein LevelsFollow up (n=32)2.3169 milligrams per LiterStandard Deviation 3.24139
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Activity component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=40)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=39)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=39)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Activitiy) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Arising component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Arising) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Dressing and Grooming component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Dressing and Grooming) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Eating component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Eating) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Grip component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Grip) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Hygiene component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Hygiene) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 46
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Reach component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Reach) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Walking component was measured on 0-3 scale (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=40)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=40)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=34)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in CHAQ-DI (Walking) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 4 possible responses to each question (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do). A domain score is the highest score in that domain. To calculate the overall score, the participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score and ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A higher score indicates less ability.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=41)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=41)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=35)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment - Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow up

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)5.0 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 4.08
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=41)-0.95 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 3.83
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=41)-0.9 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 5.01
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=35)-1.2 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 5.26
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.9 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 3.3
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)-0.35 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 5.22
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.5 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 6.88
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)3.3 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 14.68
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in ESR at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)5.9 millimeters per hour (mm/hour)Standard Deviation 8.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow up

Joint with active arthritis was defined as a joint with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)1.4 JointsStandard Deviation 2.68
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)3.9 JointsStandard Deviation 11.55
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=41)-0.1 JointsStandard Deviation 1.7
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=41)-0.4 JointsStandard Deviation 4.56
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=35)-1.4 JointsStandard Deviation 2.8
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-1.7 JointsStandard Deviation 3.34
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.4 JointsStandard Deviation 8.17
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)1.9 JointsStandard Deviation 7.52
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)1.2 JointsStandard Deviation 4.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow up

The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement is 67 and these were defined as those with 'limitation of motion'.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)3.5 JointsStandard Deviation 6.3
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=41)-0.6 JointsStandard Deviation 2.23
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=41)-0.9 JointsStandard Deviation 2.75
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=35)-1.3 JointsStandard Deviation 3.14
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-1.5 JointsStandard Deviation 4.21
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)-1.2 JointsStandard Deviation 5.1
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)0.0 JointsStandard Deviation 1.83
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)0.7 JointsStandard Deviation 3.09
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)2.6 JointsStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow up

The physician provides a rating of the participant's arthritis disease activity on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale. The extreme left end of the line represents 'arthritis inactive' (ie, symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end represents 'arthritis very active'. A higher score indicates more disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)4.5 mmStandard Deviation 4.99
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=41)1.0 mmStandard Deviation 5.66
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=41)0.1 mmStandard Deviation 4.97
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=35)-0.6 mmStandard Deviation 4.29
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-0.4 mmStandard Deviation 5.8
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)0.4 mmStandard Deviation 6.52
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)1.0 mmStandard Deviation 6.5
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)2.9 mmStandard Deviation 13.09
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PGA of Disease Activity at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)4.4 mmStandard Deviation 8.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow up

The participant or parent/guardian, as appropriate, provides a rating of the participant's well-being on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale. The extreme left end of the line represents 'very well' (ie, symptom-free and no arthritis disease activity) and the extreme right end represents 'very poor' (ie, maximum arthritis disease activity). A higher score indicates poorer well-being. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 48 (n=22)-2.2 mmStandard Deviation 4.89
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 60 (n=17)-1.2 mmStandard Deviation 2.08
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upBaseline (n=41)4.0 mmStandard Deviation 5.72
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 12 (n=41)-0.2 mmStandard Deviation 3.31
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 24 (n=41)-1.5 mmStandard Deviation 4.38
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 36 (n=35)-2.2 mmStandard Deviation 4.34
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 72 (n=10)-0.9 mmStandard Deviation 1.6
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Week 84 (n=7)-0.9 mmStandard Deviation 2.19
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in PtGA of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of Follow upChange From Baseline at Follow Up (n=33)3.2 mmStandard Deviation 7.39
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow up

Clinical remission: inactive disease for minimum of 6 continuous months while on medication (Level 1); off oral corticosteroid medications but still on tocilizumab (Level 2); off both methotrexate and oral corticosteroids but still on tocilizumab (Level 3); or off all anti-arthritis medications-oral corticosteroids, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs but still on tocilizumab (Level 4). Inactive disease: No joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA; Normal ESR (\<20 mm/hour); PGA of disease activity indicated no disease activity (score ≤10 mm on a 100 mm VAS where 0 \[inactive arthritis\] and 100 \[very active arthritis\]). Overall percentage of participants with clinical remission (any level) are reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline43.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 1246.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 2448.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upFollow up46.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow up

Criteria for Inactive Disease: 1) No joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both), 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 3) Normal ESR (less than \[\<\] 20 millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]), and 4) PGA of disease activity using VAS indicated no disease activity (where no disease activity is considered to be a score less than or equal to \[≤\]10 mm on a 100 mm VAS where left end of line 0 \[inactive arthritis\] to right end of line 100 \[very active arthritis\]).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline63.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 1265.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 2475.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 12, 24 and End of Follow upFollow up61.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow Up

JIA ACR30 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 30% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: Physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); Patient/parent global assessment (PtGA) of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow UpBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow UpWeek 12100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow UpWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow UpFollow up80.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow up

JIA ACR50 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 50% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: PGA of disease activity using VAS from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); PtGA of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and ESR.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 12100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upFollow up80.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow up

JIA ACR70 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 70% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: PGA of disease activity using VAS from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); PtGA of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and ESR

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 12100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 2497.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upFollow up78.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow up

JIA ACR90 response was defined as 3 of any 6 core outcome variables improved by at least 90% of the baseline assessments, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by more than 30%. Six core variables were: PGA of disease activity using VAS from left end of line 0 (inactive arthritis) to right end of line 100 (very active arthritis); PtGA of overall well-being using a VAS from left end of line 0 (very well) to right end of line 100 (very poor); Number of joints with active arthritis (joints with swelling not due to deformity or joints with limitation of motion and with pain, tenderness or both); Number of joints with limitation of movement; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions in 8 areas (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities) answered on a scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and ESR.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, End of Follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 2480.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upBaseline73.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upWeek 1278.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24 and End of Follow upFollow up75.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow up

The CHAQ-DI, as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 4 possible responses to each question (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do). A domain score is the highest score in that domain. To calculate the overall score, the participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score and ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A higher score indicates less ability. A minimally important improvement was defined as at least a 0.13 improvement in CHAQ-DI score from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, End of follow up (up to 101 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upWeek 122.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upWeek 242.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upWeek 365.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upWeek 4818.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upWeek 7210.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upWeek 8428.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Minimally Important Improvement in the CHAQ-DI Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and End of Follow upFollow Up15.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026