Skip to content

The Effect of Different Sevoflurane Concentrations on Intraocular Pressure in Patients Undergoing Ocular Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01575626
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-04-11
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

IOP Changes Due to Anesthesia (Healthy Patients)

Brief summary

One important goal in anesthetic management during ocular surgery is to provide adequate control of intraocular pressure (IOP). An increase in IOP may be catastrophic in patients with glaucoma or a penetrating open-eye injury. There is an ongoing debate over the effect of anesthetic agents on the IOP. Anesthetic regimens in this surgical field commonly consist of short-acting anesthetic agents, such as propofol and sevoflurane, usually combined with short-acting analgesics, such as remifentanil. Both propofol and sevoflurane are known to reduce the IOP. To this end there is no data in the literature to support or disprove this finding. Study Hypothesis Variations in the end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations have no significant effect on the IOP.

Detailed description

One important goal in anesthetic management during ocular surgery is to provide adequate control of intraocular pressure (IOP). An increase in IOP may be catastrophic in patients with glaucoma or a penetrating open-eye injury. There is an ongoing debate over the effect of anesthetic agents on the IOP. Anesthetic regimens in this surgical field commonly consist of short-acting anesthetic agents, such as propofol and sevoflurane, usually combined with short-acting analgesics, such as remifentanil. Both propofol and sevoflurane are known to reduce the IOP. Previous studies have compared these two anesthetics protocols in order to determine which provides superior control of the IOP. Propofol produced significantly lower IOP measurements compared to sevoflurane (both combined with remifentanil), in cataract surgery, whereas in non-ophthalmic surgery propofol and sevoflurane caused a comparable decrease in IOP. Sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic, has a rapid onset of action faster recovery time and is also suitable for inhalation induction because it does not irritate the airway. A prospective randomized clinical trial compared the effects of ketamine and sevoflurane on IOP during the eight minutes after induction of anesthesia (in 2-minute intervals) in children with suspected or diagnosed glaucoma undergoing EUA. During these 8 minutes the IOP decreased significantly only in the sevoflurane group. This finding contradicted claims that measurements immediately after induction are relatively unaffected by anesthetics and suggested that variations in sevoflurane concentration do affect the IOP. Yoshitake et al showed that the remarkable reductions of IOP after inductions are probably caused by induction agents, suggesting that sevoflurane is a useful anesthetic for elderly patients receiving ophthalmic surgeries. To this end there is no data in the literature to support or disprove this finding. Study Hypothesis Variations in the end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations have no significant effect on the IOP.

Interventions

DRUGSevoflurane

All active comparators of this study have the same intervention as mentioned ahead: First IOP measurement will be performed just before anesthesia induction. Standard general anesthesia will be induced using propofol (5 mcg/ml) administered by target controlled infusion (TCI - Schnider model),fentanyl and rocuronium according to standard protocol of general anesthesia. The second IOP measurement will be performed just before tracheal intubation. Following tracheal intubation, concentration of propofol will be decreased till 0 and anesthesia with sevoflurane will be started, followed by 3 more IOP measurements for different end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations (Consented patients will be randomly allocated to one of three groups as mentioned). Total of 5 IOP measurements. IOP will be measured by the ophthalmologist via both TonoPen XL and Schioz devices.

Sponsors

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The study will include both men and women over 18 years old undergoing elective surgery for strabismus correction or tear duct probing and irrigation under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known allergies, * adverse reaction or contraindication (of any other reason) to sevoflurane or remifentanil, or any other anesthetic drug, * patients with pre-existing intra-ocular ophthalmic disease, or infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
effect of different end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations on the IOP1 yearTo assess the effect of different end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations on the IOP in patients undergoing extraocular procedures, i.e. strabismus correction and tear duct probing and irrigation under general anesthesia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
propofol vs. sevoflurane on IOP1 yearTo compare the influence of propofol vs. sevoflurane on IOP

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactNina Gofman, MD
ninagof@gmail.com972-527360475

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026