Skip to content

The Neurobiology of Expectancy and Pain Perception

A Brain Imaging Study of the Analgesic Effect of Lidocaine and the Hyperalgesic Effect of Capsaicin

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01575106
Enrollment
38
Registered
2012-04-11
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2017-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

This study will use using fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to elucidate how contextual learning/expectation relieves or aggravates pain experience in the same cohort of subjects and the same study session.

Interventions

DEVICEHeat pain applied using TSA or CHEPS

TSA-2001 Thermal Sensory Analyzer (Medoc LTD Advanced Medical Systems) or the Pathway Medoc (CHEPS model, Contact Heat-Evoked Potential Stimulator, Medoc LTD Advanced Medical Systems)

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* a) Healthy male and female adults aged 21-50 * b) No contraindications to fMRI scanning * c) Right handed

Exclusion criteria

* a) Current or past history of major medical, neurological, or psychiatric illness * b) Pregnancy or breast feeding, menopause, and irregular menstrual cycles (length of cycle must be within 26 to 32 days) * c) Claustrophobia * d) History of head trauma * e) History of impaired elimination * f) Instability of responses to experimental pain (see Study Procedures Section) * g) Use of psychotropic drugs, hormone treatments (including hormonal birth control) within 1 year * h) Non-fluent speaker of English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Weeks 1-3Subjects received heat pain before and after the application of a neutral cream (told one application of neutral cream was lidocaine, one was capsaicin, and one was neutral) and rated pain intensity on a 0-20 Visual Analogue Scale (0-no pain, 20-intolerable pain). We only measure this outcome measure in session 3. The pain intensity for each cream was averaged amongst all participants for both the pre and post treatment in session 3. Subjects have up to 3 weeks to complete the 3 sessions.
fMRI Signal Changes in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate CortexWeek 4We used fMRI to investigate the signal changes associated with administration of identical pain stimuli before (pre) and after the treatment (post) with different creams in session 3. It is important to note that the subjects had multiple weeks to complete the study, but this measure was only taken during one session. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point (post treatment) minus the value at the earlier time point (pre treatment).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Heat Pain
There is only one cohort in this study. All subjects receive the same intervention, the application of heat pain using TSA or CHEPS. Heat pain applied using TSA or CHEPS: TSA-2001 Thermal Sensory Analyzer (Medoc LTD Advanced Medical Systems) or the Pathway Medoc (CHEPS model, Contact Heat-Evoked Potential Stimulator, Medoc LTD Advanced Medical Systems)
24
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHeat Pain
Age, Continuous26.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 380 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

fMRI Signal Changes in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex

We used fMRI to investigate the signal changes associated with administration of identical pain stimuli before (pre) and after the treatment (post) with different creams in session 3. It is important to note that the subjects had multiple weeks to complete the study, but this measure was only taken during one session. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point (post treatment) minus the value at the earlier time point (pre treatment).

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The neutral cream is omitted from the data table below because we were only concerned about the direct comparison between positive expectancy (Lidocaine) and negative expectancy (Capsaicin) conditions. Data were only collected for the Lidocaine and Capsaicin creams.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Heat PainfMRI Signal Changes in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate CortexLidocaine0.2 Post-Pre treatment peak betaStandard Deviation 0.18
Heat PainfMRI Signal Changes in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate CortexCapsaicin0.3 Post-Pre treatment peak betaStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Subjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)

Subjects received heat pain before and after the application of a neutral cream (told one application of neutral cream was lidocaine, one was capsaicin, and one was neutral) and rated pain intensity on a 0-20 Visual Analogue Scale (0-no pain, 20-intolerable pain). We only measure this outcome measure in session 3. The pain intensity for each cream was averaged amongst all participants for both the pre and post treatment in session 3. Subjects have up to 3 weeks to complete the 3 sessions.

Time frame: Weeks 1-3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Heat PainSubjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Pre-treatment placebo Lidocaine10.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Heat PainSubjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Pre-treatment placebo capsaicin11 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Heat PainSubjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Pre-treatment neutral11.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Heat PainSubjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Post-treatment placebo lidocaine8.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3
Heat PainSubjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Post-treatment placebo capsaicin12.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Heat PainSubjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)Post-treatment neutral10.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026