Skip to content

The Anesthetic Efficacy of 3% Mepivacaine Plus 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Lower Jaw Dental Injections

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 3% Mepivacaine Plus 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01574807
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-04-10
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

mepivacaine, lidocaine, inferior alveolar nerve block, pulpal anesthesia, mepivacaine/lidocaine, lidocaine/lidocaine

Brief summary

The inferior alveolar nerve block (shot) is the most frequently used injection technique for achieving local anesthesia (numbness) for the teeth in the lower jaw. However, this injection does not always result in successful pulpal (tooth) anesthesia (patient felt pain). No study has combined mepivacaine and lidocaine anesthetics (numbing solutions) for this type of injection (shot). The investigators propose to compare an injection of mepivacaine followed by lidocaine to an injection of lidocaine followed by lidocaine to determine if there is a difference in effectiveness.

Detailed description

One hundred adult male and female subjects will randomly receive two sets of inferior alveolar block injections (shots) consisting of; 1.) an injection of 1.8 mL of 3% mepivacaine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and 2.) an injection of 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, at two separate appointments spaced at least two weeks apart, in a crossover design. Whether the subject receives the mepivacaine or the lidocaine for the first injection will be determined randomly. The doctor will not know whether the subject receives mepivacaine or lidocaine for the first injection. The subject will not know which anesthetics he/she receives. A pulp tester will be used to test the lower jaw teeth (molars, premolars, and incisors) for anesthesia (numbness) in 4-minute time cycles for 60 minutes. The data will be statistically analyzed.

Interventions

DRUGmepivacaine + lidocaine followed by lidocaine +lidocaine

1.8 mL of 3% mepivacaine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

DRUGlidocaine + lidocaine followed by mepivacaine + lidocaine

1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine followed by 1.8 mL of 3% mepivacaine followed by 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* between the ages of 18 and 65 years * good health (ASA classification I or II) * able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* allergy to lidocaine or mepivacaine * history of significant medical problem (ASA classification III or greater) * depression * have taken CNS depressants (including alcohol or any analgesic medications) within the last 48 hours * lactating or pregnant * inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia Success.60 minutes per injection sequence.An electric pulp tester will be used to test the lower jaw teeth (molars, premolars, and incisors) for anesthesia (numbness) in 4-minute time cycles for 60 minutes. Measurements of less than 80 on the EPT is considered not numb (anesthesia failure). Readings of 80 equate to anesthetic success.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred from august 2011 to May 2013 in the dental clinic of the College of Dentistry.

Pre-assignment details

No subjects were excluded from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants receive 3% mepivacaine + 2% lidocaine versus 2% lidocaine + 2% lidocaine injections in different randomized sequences.
100
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia Success.

An electric pulp tester will be used to test the lower jaw teeth (molars, premolars, and incisors) for anesthesia (numbness) in 4-minute time cycles for 60 minutes. Measurements of less than 80 on the EPT is considered not numb (anesthesia failure). Readings of 80 equate to anesthetic success.

Time frame: 60 minutes per injection sequence.

Population: Success of anesthesia was determined by subject achieving maximal level (80) with testing device by 5th testing time period (17 min.) following injection and maintaining that maximal response for the remainder of the testing time.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mepivacaine + LidocaineNumber of Participants Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia Success.44 Participants
Lidocaine + LidocaineNumber of Participants Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia Success.40 Participants
p-value: 1McNemar

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026