Skip to content

Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial Drug Eluting Balloons vs. Drug Eluting Stents in Small Vessel Interventions

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Multicenter Trial to Test the Non-inferiority of Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Drug Eluting Stent Treatment in de Novo Stenoses of Small Native Vessels Regarding Efficacy and Safety

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01574534
Acronym
BASKET-SMALL2
Enrollment
758
Registered
2012-04-10
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2020-01-15
Last updated
2020-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Heart Disease

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that in a real-world population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de-novo stenoses in small native vessels with a diameter \<3 mm, drug eluting balloons (DEB) are non inferior to third-generation drug eluting stents (DES).

Detailed description

Drug-eluting balloons are an established treatment for in-stent stenoses and showed good results in small vessels. Moreover, the available data suggest that DEB are a promising new technique for the treatment of de-novo stenoses in small vessels if pre-dilatation is performed and geographical mismatch is avoided. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that DEB is non-inferior to DES in a real-world population with respect to the combined clinical endpoint Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization after 12 months.

Interventions

PCI using paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent® Please balloon, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Berlin, Germany

DEVICEDrug eluting stent

PCI using paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Element® stent, Boston Scientific Corp, Natick MA

Sponsors

Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) 2 to 4 or silent ischemia as assessed by stress echocardiography, stress cardiac magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or fractional flow reserve * PCI of de-novo stenosis in vessels ≥2.0 to \<3.0 mm in diameter irrespective of the indication (concomitant PCI of a vessel ≥3.0 mm in diameter is permitted if the stenosis is located in a coronary artery other than the culprit vessel) * No flow-limiting dissection (TIMI ≤2) or residual stenosis \>30% after initial dilatation with a standard or non-compliant balloon, as assessed by the physician in charge * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant large-diameter PCI in the same coronary artery (LAD, Ramus circumflexus (RCX), RCA) * PCI of instent-restenosis (culprit lesion) * Life expectancy \<12 months * Pregnancy * Enrolled in another coronary intervention study * Unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major adverse cardiac events12 monthMajor adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization after 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACE24/36 monthMACE after 24 and 36 months
Revascularization12/24/36 monthThe single components of the primary endpoint including target lesion revascularization after 12, 24, and 36 months
Stent Thrombosis12/24/36 monthPossible, probable, and definite stent thrombosis defined according to the ARC criteria after 12, 24, and 36 months; all stent thromboses defined according to the ARC criteria after 12, 24, and 36 months
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction12/24/36 monthThrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding after 12, 24, and 36 months Net clinical benefit consisting of the primary endpoint and the TIMI major bleeding after 12, 24, and 36 months
Outcome in patients with high bleeding risk including patients on OAC12 monthsOutcome analyis of patients with high bleeding risk with regard to Major bleeding events (BARC)
Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA)12 monthsQCA of patients who had events which required CAG/PCI after Baseline PCI
Outcome in acute versus stable CAD12 monthsDifference of the Population with acute versus stable CAD with regard to baseline characteristics, primary and secondary outcome measures (MACE, stent thrombosis, major bleeding)
Outcome in diabetics vs non diabetics12 monthsDifference of the diabetic versus non-diabetic population regarding baseline characteristics and primary and secondary outcome measures (MACE, stent thrombosis, major bleeding)
sex specific inequalities in the use of drug coated balloons for small coronary artery disease12 monthssex specific difference in baseline charchteristics, Impact of sex on safety and efficacy in the stent-free strategy regarding primary and secondary endpoint (MACE, stent thrombosis, major bleeding)
Cost-effectiveness12/24/36 monthCost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12, 24, and 36 months

Countries

Austria, Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026