Skip to content

SC-PEG Asparaginase vs. Oncaspar in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Randomized Study of Intravenous Calaspargase Pegol (SC-PEG Asparaginase) and Intravenous Oncaspar in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01574274
Enrollment
240
Registered
2012-04-10
Start date
2012-06-01
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to learn about the effects of SC-PEG, which is a new form of a chemotherapy drug called asparaginase. Asparaginase is used to treat ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma. The standard form of asparaginase, called Elspar, is given in the muscle once a week for 30 weeks. There are other forms of asparaginase. The investigators will be studying two of these: Oncaspar and Calaspargase Pegol (SC-PEG). The investigators have previously studied giving Oncaspar in the vein (instead of the muscle) every 2 weeks in patients with ALL, and have shown that this dosing did not lead to any more side effects than Elspar given weekly in the muscle. The study drug, SC-PEG, is very similar but not identical to Oncaspar. SC-PEG has been given in the vein to children and adolescents with ALL as part of other research studies, and it appears to last longer in the blood after a dose than Oncaspar. It has not yet been approved by the FDA. The goal of this research study is to learn whether the side effects and drug levels of SC-PEG given in the vein every 3 weeks are similar to Oncaspar given into the vein about every 2 weeks. The study will also help to determine whether changing treatment for children and adolescents with ALL with high levels of minimal residual disease may improve cure rates. Measuring minimal disease (MRD) is a laboratory test that finds low levels of leukemia cells that the investigators cannot see under the microscope. In the past, it has been shown that children and adolescents with ALL with high levels of MRD after one month of treatment are less likely to be cured than those with low levels of MRD. Therefore, on the study, the bone marrow and blood at the end of the first month of treatment will be measured in participants with leukemia, and changes in therapy will be implemented based on this measurement. It is not known for sure that changing treatment will improve cure rates. MRD levels can only be measured if the marrow is filled with cancer cells at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, MRD studies will only be done in children and adolescents with ALL and not in those with lymphoblastic lymphoma. Another part of the study is to determine whether giving antibiotics during the first month of treatment even to participants without fever will prevent serious infections in the blood and other parts of the body. About 25% of children and adolescents with ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma who receive standard treatment develop a serious blood infection from a bacteria during the first month of treatment. Typically, antibiotics (medicines that fight bacteria) are given by vein only after a child with leukemia or lymphoma develops a fever or have other signs of infection. In this study, antibiotics will be given by mouth or in the vein to all participants during the first month of treatment, whether or not they develop fever. Another goal of the study to learn how vitamin D levels relate to bone problems (such as broken bones or fractures) that children and adolescents with ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma experience while on treatment. Some of the chemotherapy drugs used to treat ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma can make bones weaker, which make fractures more likely. Vitamin D is a natural substance from food and sunlight that can help keep bones strong. The investigators will study how often participants have low levels of vitamin D while receiving chemotherapy, and, for those with low levels, whether giving vitamin D supplements will increase those levels. Another focus of the study is to learn more about the biology of ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma by doing research on blood, bone and spinal fluid bone marrow samples. The goal of this research is to improve treatment for children with leukemia in the future.

Detailed description

To determine whether or not children and adolescents with ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma are eligible to participate in this study, screening tests will be performed, which may include the following: medical history, bone marrow tests, assessment of your tumor, blood tests and/or an EKG. Participants who enroll in this study will receive with anti-leukemia drugs called chemotherapy. During study treatment, the study doctors will continue to perform tests on blood, bone marrow and spinal fluid to assess how the disease is responding to the study treatment and to look for possible side effects. Scans (for example, x-ray, CT scan or MRI scan) may also be done after beginning study treatment to look for possible side effects. If the disease was initially diagnosed by a scan, it will also be repeated during the study treatment to assess how it is responding. There are three different treatment groups in which leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma can be divided and they differ slightly in the types and amounts of chemotherapy drugs used during the 2-years of therapy. Participants are assigned to the different categories based on the features of their leukemia or lymphoma, such as their age, white blood cell count, and results of other tests. The three different treatment groups are called "Standard Risk", "High Risk" and "Very High Risk". Participants will be given several different chemotherapy drugs during many periods of treatment (called "phases"). These drugs are known to kill lymphoblastic cancer cells. Some of the drugs are given by mouth, some into the veins (intravenously), and others as an injection (a shot) into the muscle. Some chemotherapy drugs will be given directly into your spinal fluid (called intrathecal chemotherapy) during a lumbar puncture (spinal tap). This treatment helps prevent the cancer cells from coming back in the spinal fluid and brain. The first phase of treatment is steroid prophase. This phase of treatment is typically given in the hospital. This phase of treatment will begin immediately. after enrolling on the study. The second phase of treatment is remission induction. This phase will begin immediately after the steroid prophase and will last four weeks. Participants typically remain in the hospital for most (sometimes all) of this phase. At the end of the remission induction phase, participants will undergo tests to determine if they are in remission. This testing will involve getting samples of blood, bone marrow and spinal fluid to look for cancer cells under the microscope. This testing will also involve getting repeat scans if these were not normal at the time of diagnosis. Remission means that cancer cells cannot be detected under the microscope in the blood, marrow and spinal fluid, and that any cancer previously seen on a scan has significantly improved or is no longer seen. Participants must be in remission to go onto the next phases of treatment; alternative treatments will be discussed with participants who are not in remission at the end of the induction phase. The Consolidation I phase begins once it is determined that a participant is in remission. This phase lasts about three weeks. This phase of treatment is given in the hospital, but participants may be able to leave the hospital after the first week of the phase. The purpose of this phase is to further reduce the number of cancer cells in the body. The next phase is the Central Nervous System (CNS) phase, and is usually given in the outpatient setting. Participants may need to be admitted to the hospital during this phase of treatment if a complication develops, such as infection. This phase of therapy begins immediately after the Consolidation I phase and lasts about 3 weeks. Treatment involves a series of lumbar punctures with anti-leukemia drugs given intrathecally over a two week period. Anti-leukemia drugs will also be given by mouth and by vein during this phase as well. Some participants may receive radiation therapy during this phase, although most do not. The decision to treat with radiation or not is based on characteristics of the cancer at diagnosis and whether or not cancer cells were seen in spinal fluid at that time. Radiation therapy is a painless procedure, the purpose of which is to prevent leukemia from coming back in the brain. For participants who receive radiation therapy, it will be given in either 8 or 10 daily treatments, depending on how many leukemia cells were seen in the spinal fluid under the microscope at diagnosis. The next phase of the study is Consolidation II. This phase begins about 3 weeks after starting the CNS phase and lasts for about 27 weeks. During this phase, chemotherapy is given in three-week cycles, with some drugs given in clinic and some drugs given by mouth at home. Participants are typically treated as outpatients during this phase. The last phase is called Continuation. This is also usually given as an outpatient. The goal of this phase is to rid the body of all remaining cancer cells. The cycles of chemotherapy during this phase are repeated every 3 weeks, with some drugs given in clinic and some drugs given by mouth at home. This phase will ends two years after remission was documented. The randomization in this study involves the two forms of asparaginase, Oncaspar and SC-PEG asparaginase. Because no one knows which of the study options is best, participants will be "randomized" into one of the study groups: to receive Oncaspar or to receive SC-PEG. Randomization means that participants are put into a group by chance. Participants who are placed in the Oncaspar group will receive a single dose of Oncaspar on Day 7 of the Remission Induction phase, and then every 2 weeks for 30 weeks starting in the CNS phase (16 total doses of Oncaspar). Participants placed in the SC-PEG group will receive SC-PEG asparaginase on Day 7 of the remission induction phase and then every 3 weeks beginning in the CNS phase (11 total doses of SC-PEG). Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) testing is a way to look for very low levels of leukemia in the body that cannot be seen under the microscope. These test will be done in a laboratory at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. If the MRD results are in the low range on Day 32, thre will be no change to the treatment program described above. If the MRD results are in the high range, then it will be recommended that treatment be changed. Participants will receive a fluoroquinolone antibiotic beginning during the first phase of treatment and continuing until the neutrophils and monocytes (two types of white blood cells in the blood that help fight infection) have increased. The goal of giving the antibiotics is to prevent infection during the first few weeks of treatment. Participants who agree to have extra blood drawn to test for vitamin D levels in the blood will have 1 teaspoon of blood drawn at the following times: start of treatment, at the end of the first month of treatment, at the start of the continuation phase, and at the end of treatment. Participants will receive the results of these tests. If the vitamin D level is low, the study doctor will recommend that the participant take a vitamin D supplement. Participants may choose not to have blood drawn to check vitamin D levels, or may choose not to take the vitamin D supplement. Participants will be asked at the time of study entry if they agree to provide additional blood and bone marrow samples for research. These additional samples will be used to learn more about the biology of ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma. Stored specimens may also be used for future research regarding leukemia. After completing all treatment, participants will be asked to come in for physical exams and blood work every month for the first six months after the final treatment, then every two months for the next 6 months, then every four months for the next year, and then every six months for the next year. After that we will ask you to come in once a year. The investigators would like to keep track of the medical condition of all participants for the rest of their lives. This will be done by reviewing medical records of participants. The investigators may telephone participants who have finished treatment to see how they are doing if they have not been seen by their doctor for at least a year.

Interventions

DRUGSC-PEG

11 doses Intravenously over one hour

16 doses Intravenously over one hour

Sponsors

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER
Shire
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
365 Days to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of ALL or lymphoblastic leukemia * No prior therapy except short courses of corticosteroids, a single dose of IT cytarabine or emergent radiation to the mediastinum or other life-threatening masses

Exclusion criteria

* Have received more than 7 days of corticosteroids in the preceding 4 weeks or more than 28 days of corticosteroids in the preceding 6 months * Have received any chemotherapy or radiotherapy for previous malignancy * Receiving any other investigational agent * Known to be HIV positive * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness * Pregnant or breastfeeding * History of previous malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Asparaginase-Related Toxicity30-week post-induction asparaginase treatment period. Toxicities assessed on an ongoing basis (at least 1 per month) while participant is on study, an average of 2 years.Asparaginase-related toxicity rate is defined as the percentage of patients who experience allergy (all grades), symptomatic pancreatitis (grade 2 or worse), thrombotic or bleeding complications requiring intervention (grade 2 or worse) with treatment attribution of possibly, probably or definite based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.
Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelSamples for nadir serum asparaginase activity levels were assayed at 4,11,18,and 25 days after 1st dose, and then prior to asparaginase dose given during post-induction, at Week 7, 13, 19, and 25.Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of Infections2 yearsNumber of episodes of bacteremia, fungemia and invasive fungal infections during the remission induction phase
Outcome2 yearsRates of complete remission, relapse, induction death, remission death, and second malignant neoplasms in participants
Outcome of Participants With Very-high Risk Disease2 yearsRates of relapse, remission death and second malignant neoplasm in participants with high minimal residual disease (MRD) and/or high risk cytogenetics who are treated with a more intensified regimen
Feasibility of Vitamin D Screening/Supplementation2 yearsVitamin D-levels at various times during treatment, proportion of participants with low vitamin D levels, proportion of participants who agree to Vitamin D supplementation
Feasibility of Prospective Screening for ABGD2 yearsNumber of samples from participants with T-ALL in which a successful result was obtained by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to assess absence of biallelic TCRy deletions (ABGD); frequency of ABGD in T-ALL
Feasibility of Prospective Screening for Genetic Abnormalities2 yearsNumber of samples from participants with B-ALL in which a successful result was obtained in prospective screening for abnormalities (eg, mutations, deletions, rearrangements) of IKZF1, CRLF2 and JAK1/2 in patients with newly diagnosed B-ALL; proportion of participants with B-ALL found to have one of these abnormalities.
Relationship Between Apoptotic/Anti-apoptotic Proteins and Response to CT2 yearsLevels of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins in participant samples from diagnosis; correlation of these levels to clinical response (induction failure, high MRD, relapse).

Countries

Canada, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndrew Place, MD

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients enrolled from June 3, 2012 to June 8, 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SC-PEG (Arm A)
Patients in this arm were randomized to receive IV Calaspargase Pegol (SC-PEG) 2500 IU/m2, administered as a single dose during induction and for 30 weeks post-induction. In the post-induction phases, IV SC-PEG was administered every 3 weeks (for a total of 10 post-induction doses). Protocol therapy was comprised of 5 phases: Induction, Consolidation I, CNS, Consolidation II, and Continuation, and varied based off risk classification.
119
Oncaspar (Arm B)
Patients in this arm were randomized to receive IV Oncaspar 2500 IU/m2, administered as a single dose during induction and for 30 weeks post-induction. In the post-induction phases, IV Oncaspar was administered every 2 weeks (for a total of 15 post-induction doses). Protocol therapy was comprised of 5 phases: Induction, Consolidation I, CNS, Consolidation II, and Continuation, and varied based off risk classification.
120
Total239

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOncaspar (Arm B)SC-PEG (Arm A)Total
Age, Customized
< 10 years old
90 Participants89 Participants179 Participants
Age, Customized
>/= 10 years old
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
CNS status at diagnosis
CNS 1
99 Participants90 Participants189 Participants
CNS status at diagnosis
CNS 2
15 Participants19 Participants34 Participants
CNS status at diagnosis
CNS 3
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
CNS status at diagnosis
Traumatic with Blasts
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
CNS status at diagnosis
Traumatic without Blasts
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
77 Participants74 Participants151 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
29 Participants33 Participants62 Participants
Immunophenotype
B-immunophenotype
104 Participants103 Participants207 Participants
Immunophenotype
T-immunophenotype
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Initial Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) risk group
High Risk
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Initial Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) risk group
Standard Risk
71 Participants70 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants43 Participants92 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants76 Participants147 Participants
White Blood Cell (WBC) at diagnosis (cells/uL)
< 50,000
96 Participants93 Participants189 Participants
White Blood Cell (WBC) at diagnosis (cells/uL)
>/= 50,000
20 Participants21 Participants41 Participants
White Blood Cell (WBC) at diagnosis (cells/uL)
Missing
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 1195 / 120
other
Total, other adverse events
118 / 119120 / 120
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 11927 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Level

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods.

Time frame: Samples for nadir serum asparaginase activity levels were assayed at 4,11,18,and 25 days after 1st dose, and then prior to asparaginase dose given during post-induction, at Week 7, 13, 19, and 25.

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of all randomized patients who consented to research studies with an evaluable sample for analysis of serum asparaginase activity at the respective induction and post-induction assessment timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 7 NSAA Level1.006 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 11 NSAA Level0.571 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 13 NSAA Level1.147 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 18 NSAA Level0.394 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 19 NSAA Level1.110 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 25 NSAA Level0.319 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 25 NSAA Level1.117 IU/mL
SC-PEG (Arm A)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 4 NSAA Level0.975 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 25 NSAA Level1.109 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 11 NSAA Level0.673 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 18 NSAA Level0.314 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 25 NSAA Level0.056 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 7 NSAA Level1.097 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 13 NSAA Level1.101 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelWeek 19 NSAA Level1.134 IU/mL
Oncaspar (Arm B)Induction and Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity LevelDay 4 NSAA Level1.045 IU/mL
Comparison: Day 4 NSAA Levelp-value: 0.07t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Day 11 NSAA Levelp-value: 0.29t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Day 18 NSAA Levelp-value: 0.0002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Day 25 NSAA Levelp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 7 NSAA Levelp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 13 NSAA Levelp-value: 0.87t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 19 NSAA Levelp-value: 0.83t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 25 NSAA Levelp-value: 0.94t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Number of Participants With Asparaginase-Related Toxicity

Asparaginase-related toxicity rate is defined as the percentage of patients who experience allergy (all grades), symptomatic pancreatitis (grade 2 or worse), thrombotic or bleeding complications requiring intervention (grade 2 or worse) with treatment attribution of possibly, probably or definite based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.

Time frame: 30-week post-induction asparaginase treatment period. Toxicities assessed on an ongoing basis (at least 1 per month) while participant is on study, an average of 2 years.

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of all patients who received post-induction asparaginase.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SC-PEG (Arm A)Number of Participants With Asparaginase-Related Toxicity41 Participants
Oncaspar (Arm B)Number of Participants With Asparaginase-Related Toxicity43 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Feasibility of Prospective Screening for ABGD

Number of samples from participants with T-ALL in which a successful result was obtained by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to assess absence of biallelic TCRy deletions (ABGD); frequency of ABGD in T-ALL

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Feasibility of Prospective Screening for Genetic Abnormalities

Number of samples from participants with B-ALL in which a successful result was obtained in prospective screening for abnormalities (eg, mutations, deletions, rearrangements) of IKZF1, CRLF2 and JAK1/2 in patients with newly diagnosed B-ALL; proportion of participants with B-ALL found to have one of these abnormalities.

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Feasibility of Vitamin D Screening/Supplementation

Vitamin D-levels at various times during treatment, proportion of participants with low vitamin D levels, proportion of participants who agree to Vitamin D supplementation

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Frequency of Infections

Number of episodes of bacteremia, fungemia and invasive fungal infections during the remission induction phase

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Outcome

Rates of complete remission, relapse, induction death, remission death, and second malignant neoplasms in participants

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Outcome of Participants With Very-high Risk Disease

Rates of relapse, remission death and second malignant neoplasm in participants with high minimal residual disease (MRD) and/or high risk cytogenetics who are treated with a more intensified regimen

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Relationship Between Apoptotic/Anti-apoptotic Proteins and Response to CT

Levels of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins in participant samples from diagnosis; correlation of these levels to clinical response (induction failure, high MRD, relapse).

Time frame: 2 years

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 29, 2026