Skip to content

A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Rapid Induction of Cooling in Stroke Patients, Cold Infusions vs. RhinoChill (iCOOL 1)

iCOOL 1 (Induction of COOLing 1): A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Rapid Induction of Cooling in Stroke Patients, Cold Infusions vs. RhinoChill

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01573117
Acronym
iCOOL 1
Enrollment
20
Registered
2012-04-06
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhagic Stroke, Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

hypothermia, induction of hypothermia, cold infusion, nasopharyngeal cooling, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebrovascular disease, neuro intensive care

Brief summary

Mild hypothermia improves outcome in patients with global cerebral ischemia after cardiac arrest. Hypothermia seems promising also in other acute hypoxic-ischemic or in brain swelling associated cerebrovascular disease. The narrow-time-frame is a major issue (time is brain). To provide immediate cooling without delay, easy to use, mobile and effective methods are needed. Cold infusions (4 °C) are an accepted standard worldwide. The RhinoChill (BeneChill, USA) is a new device. A comparison of these two induction methods has never been done before. Neither was the effect of cold infusions on brain-temperature measured. For the first time iCOOL 1 compares feasibility, safety and efficacy of the two methods.

Interventions

Nasopharyngeal cooling with the RhinoChill device

Infusion of 2L cold crystalloid solution (4°C) over 30 minutes

Sponsors

University Hospital Heidelberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sedation, intubation and mechanical ventilation * Combined ICP-temperature-probe * Indication to lower body temperature * Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Body weight \> 120 kg * Fever \> 38.5°C * Chronic sinusitis * Current or past fracture or surgery of the paranasal sinuses * Severe infection with bacteremia or sepsis ≤ 72 h * Severe renal insufficiency * Severe liver insufficiency * Acute pulmonary embolism * Acute myocardial infarction * Severe cardiac insufficiency (NYHA ≥ III) * Threatening ventricular dysrhythmia * Cardiac dysrhythmia with bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 /min, QTc \> 450 ms, sick sinus syndrome, AV-block II-III°). * Known hematologic disease with increased risk of thrombosis (e.g. cryoglobulinemia, cold agglutinins, sickle cell anemia) * Known vasospastic vascular disorder (e.g. Raynaud's phenomenon or thromboangiitis obliterans)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brain temperature-15 to +60minPrimary endpoint: Change of brain temperature during one hour after start of cooling. Repeated measurement ANOVA for within subject contrasts (phase 1 (0 to 15min), 2 (15 to 30min), 3 (30 to 45min) and 4 (45 to 60min)) vs. baseline (-15 to 0min)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
(Neuro-)vital parameters-15 to +60 minEffects on (neuro-)vital parameters (e.g. HR, AP, ICP, CPP) are registered.
Cerebral autoregulation-15 to +60 minCerebral auto-regulation parameters (e.g. PRx) are calculated on the basis of the (neuro-)vital parameters monitored.
Safety0-6 monthsVarious safety parameters, such as bleeding complications, cardiac decompensation, or local irritations in the nasopharynx are assessed.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026