Skip to content

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Fixed Dose Combinations of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate, Aclidinium Bromide, Formoterol Fumarate and Placebo for 28-Weeks Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe, Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Phase III, Long-term, Randomized, Double-blind, Extension Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Fixed Dose Combinations of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate, Aclidinium Bromide, Formoterol Fumarate and Placebo for 28- Weeks Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe, Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01572792
Enrollment
921
Registered
2012-04-06
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2017-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Bronchitis, Emphysema, Airflow Obstruction, Chronic, Chronic Airflow Obstruction, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this Phase III study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of inhaled aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate, aclidinium bromide, formoterol fumarate and placebo in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Long-term efficacy, pharmacoeconomic and health-related quality of life assessments will also be evaluated. This extension study will include a 28 week treatment period, followed by a four week follow up visit. All patients will remain in the same treatment group as for the lead-in study and continue on one of the four treatment arms or placebo.

Interventions

DRUGAclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC)

Inhaled Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) high dose, twice per day

Inhaled Aclidinium bromide 400 μg, twice per day

DRUGFormoterol Fumarate

Inhaled Formoterol Fumarate 12 μg, twice per day

DRUGPlacebo

Inhaled dose-matched placebo, twice per day

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completion of the treatment phase of the lead-in study, LAC-MD-31 * Written informed consent obtained from the patient before the initiation of any study specific procedures * No medical contraindication as judged by the PI * Compliance with LAC-MD-31 study procedures and IP dosing.

Exclusion criteria

* No specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse EventBaseline of lead-in study to follow-up call 14±3 days after last dose of investigational product (up to Week 52)For each safety parameter, the last assessment made before the first dose of investigational product in the lead-in study (LAC MD-31) was used as the baseline for all analyses of that safety parameter in this extension study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or UrinalysisBaseline of lead-in study to end of treatment (up to Week 52)Potentially clinically significant change: \>1.15 × upper limit of normal (ULN) for absolute cell count of basophils, eosinophils or monocytes, blood alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol, creatine kinase, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, triglycerides or uric acid \<0.85 x lower limit of normal (LLN) or \> 1.15 ULN for hematocrit ratio, haemoglobin, lymphocytes or neutrophils absolute cell count, platelet count (thrombocytes), red or white blood cell count, calcium, fasting glucose, phosphorus, total protein, or urinary pH \<0.95 x LLN or \>1.05 x ULN for chloride, potassium, sodium Urinary glucose ≥0.015, blood or ketones or protein ≥1 or specific gravity \>1.1 × ULN The last assessment made before the first dose of investigational product in the lead-in study was used as the baseline for all safety analyses in the extension study
Percentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueBaseline of lead-in study to end of treatment (up to Week 52)
Percentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)Baseline of lead-in study to end of treatment (up to Week 52)Potentially clinically significant change: Systolic BP ≥180 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg from baseline or ≤90 mmHg and decrease ≥20 mmHg from baseline Diastolic BP ≥105 mmHg and increase ≥15 mmHg from baseline or ≤50 mmHg and decrease ≥15 mmHg from baseline Pulse rate ≥110 bpm and increase ≥15% from baseline or ≤50 bpm and decrease ≥15% from baseline Weight increase or decrease ≥7% from baseline The last assessment made before the first dose of investigational product in the lead-in study was used as the baseline for all safety analyses in the extension study

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatment
Change From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatment
Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of StudyBaseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatmentThe TDI measures the change from baseline in severity of breathlessness in symptomatic patients. The TDI contains a rating for 3 categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task, magnitude of effort). TDI scale ranges from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement) including a 0 score to indicate no change. The 3 categories are added to obtain a focal score ranging from -9 (including 0) to +9.
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreBaseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatmentSt George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures COPD-specific health outcomes and consists of 3 dimension scores (symptom, activity and impact). SGRQ total score is the sum of these scores and ranges from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worst health status).

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 169 study centers, 160 in the United States, and 9 in Canada. The first patient was screened in April 2012 and the last patient visit was in June 2013

Pre-assignment details

This was a double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, 28-week treatment, extension study of the lead-in study, Study LAC-MD-31 Those patients who chose to continue the treatment in the extension study and met the eligibility for the extension study remained on the same treatment as they were randomized to in the lead-in study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo administered BID by inhalation
146
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/12 μg
Aclidinium bromide 400 μg + formoterol fumurate 12 μg fixed dose combination (FDC) administered BID by inhalation
182
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μg
Aclidinium bromide 400 μg + formoterol fumurate 6 μg fixed dose combination (FDC) administered BID by inhalation
204
Aclidinium 400 μg
Aclidinium bromide 400 μg administered BID by inhalation
194
Formoterol 12 μg
Formoterol fumurate 12 μg administered BID by inhalation
192
Total918

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Extension StudyAdverse Event76564
Extension StudyLack of Efficacy23322
Extension StudyLost to Follow-up62033
Extension StudyProtocol Violation04343
Extension StudySite termination/COPD exacerbation/other38466
Extension StudyWithdrawal by Subject7611814
Lead-in StudyAdverse Event2121221614
Lead-in StudyLack of Efficacy2054810
Lead-in StudyLost to Follow-up59424
Lead-in StudyProtocol Violation1910121321
Lead-in StudySite termination/COPD exacerbation/other1410899
Lead-in StudyWithdrawal by Subject2211122411

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboAclidinium/Formoterol 400/12 μgAclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgAclidinium 400 μgFormoterol 12 μgTotal
Age, Continuous63.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
63.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
63.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
62.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
62.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
63.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants94 Participants84 Participants90 Participants102 Participants435 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants88 Participants120 Participants104 Participants90 Participants483 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 14659 / 18264 / 20467 / 19462 / 192
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 14614 / 18214 / 20415 / 19414 / 192

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event

For each safety parameter, the last assessment made before the first dose of investigational product in the lead-in study (LAC MD-31) was used as the baseline for all analyses of that safety parameter in this extension study

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to follow-up call 14±3 days after last dose of investigational product (up to Week 52)

Population: The Extension Safety Population defined as all patients from the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) who signed informed consent at Visit 1 of this extension study (last visit of the lead-in study) and who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in this extension study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event56.8 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event65.9 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event61.3 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event67.5 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event64.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG Value

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to end of treatment (up to Week 52)

Population: The Extension Safety Population defined as all patients from the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) who signed informed consent at Visit 1 of this extension study (last visit of the lead-in study) and who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in this extension study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB change from baseline >30 msec36.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≤50 bpm & ≥15% decrease from baseline11.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB >480 msec7.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≥110 bpm & ≥15% increase from baseline0.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValuePR interval ≥200 msec & ≥25% increase2.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval >480 msec3.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval change from baseline >30 msec53.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQRS interval ≥100 msec & ≥25% increase6.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF >480 msec2.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF change from baseline >30 msec27.4 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval >480 msec3.8 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval change from baseline >30 msec53.8 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB change from baseline >30 msec37.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB >480 msec8.3 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF change from baseline >30 msec28.7 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF >480 msec0.6 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQRS interval ≥100 msec & ≥25% increase6.6 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValuePR interval ≥200 msec & ≥25% increase2.2 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≥110 bpm & ≥15% increase from baseline2.7 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≤50 bpm & ≥15% decrease from baseline6.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF >480 msec1.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≥110 bpm & ≥15% increase from baseline1.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB change from baseline >30 msec39.7 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB >480 msec9.8 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval >480 msec2.9 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF change from baseline >30 msec30.4 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQRS interval ≥100 msec & ≥25% increase3.9 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval change from baseline >30 msec55.9 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≤50 bpm & ≥15% decrease from baseline8.3 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValuePR interval ≥200 msec & ≥25% increase1.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval >480 msec2.6 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≤50 bpm & ≥15% decrease from baseline7.2 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval change from baseline >30 msec60.4 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB change from baseline >30 msec35.6 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF >480 msec0.5 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValuePR interval ≥200 msec & ≥25% increase3.1 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≥110 bpm & ≥15% increase from baseline1.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQRS interval ≥100 msec & ≥25% increase2.6 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB >480 msec5.7 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF change from baseline >30 msec27.8 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB >480 msec8.4 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≥110 bpm & ≥15% increase from baseline2.1 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF change from baseline >30 msec30.2 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcF >480 msec2.6 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueHeart rate ≤50 bpm & ≥15% decrease from baseline4.7 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQRS interval ≥100 msec & ≥25% increase4.7 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval change from baseline >30 msec48.4 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValuePR interval ≥200 msec & ≥25% increase1.6 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQTcB change from baseline >30 msec38.4 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience a Potentially Significant Post-baseline 12-lead ECG ValueQT interval >480 msec4.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or Urinalysis

Potentially clinically significant change: \>1.15 × upper limit of normal (ULN) for absolute cell count of basophils, eosinophils or monocytes, blood alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol, creatine kinase, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, triglycerides or uric acid \<0.85 x lower limit of normal (LLN) or \> 1.15 ULN for hematocrit ratio, haemoglobin, lymphocytes or neutrophils absolute cell count, platelet count (thrombocytes), red or white blood cell count, calcium, fasting glucose, phosphorus, total protein, or urinary pH \<0.95 x LLN or \>1.05 x ULN for chloride, potassium, sodium Urinary glucose ≥0.015, blood or ketones or protein ≥1 or specific gravity \>1.1 × ULN The last assessment made before the first dose of investigational product in the lead-in study was used as the baseline for all safety analyses in the extension study

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to end of treatment (up to Week 52)

Population: The Extension Safety Population defined as all patients from the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) who signed informed consent at Visit 1 of this extension study (last visit of the lead-in study) and who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in this extension study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or Urinalysis32.9 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or Urinalysis41.2 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or Urinalysis35.3 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or Urinalysis32.5 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Laboratory Values for Hematology, Chemistry or Urinalysis38.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)

Potentially clinically significant change: Systolic BP ≥180 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg from baseline or ≤90 mmHg and decrease ≥20 mmHg from baseline Diastolic BP ≥105 mmHg and increase ≥15 mmHg from baseline or ≤50 mmHg and decrease ≥15 mmHg from baseline Pulse rate ≥110 bpm and increase ≥15% from baseline or ≤50 bpm and decrease ≥15% from baseline Weight increase or decrease ≥7% from baseline The last assessment made before the first dose of investigational product in the lead-in study was used as the baseline for all safety analyses in the extension study

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to end of treatment (up to Week 52)

Population: The Extension Safety Population defined as all patients from the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) who signed informed consent at Visit 1 of this extension study (last visit of the lead-in study) and who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in this extension study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)27.4 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)24.2 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)18.6 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium 400 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)22.2 Percentage of participants
Formoterol 12 μgPercentage of Patients to Experience Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Vital Signs (Pulse Rate, Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure or Weight)24.5 Percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatment

Population: The Combined intent to treat (ITT) Population defined as all patients randomized to a treatment group who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) and who had a baseline assessment and at least 1 post-baseline assessment of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in LAC-MD-31

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)-0.086 LitersStandard Error 0.017
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.198 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.166 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Aclidinium 400 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.112 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Formoterol 12 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.109 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatment

Population: The Combined intent to treat (ITT) Population defined as all patients randomized to a treatment group who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) and who had a baseline assessment and at least 1 post-baseline assessment of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in LAC-MD-31

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)-0.101 LitersStandard Error 0.017
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.038 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.005 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Aclidinium 400 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.030 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Formoterol 12 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Predose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.004 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures COPD-specific health outcomes and consists of 3 dimension scores (symptom, activity and impact). SGRQ total score is the sum of these scores and ranges from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worst health status).

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatment

Population: The Combined intent to treat (ITT) Population defined as all patients randomized to a treatment group who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) and who had a baseline assessment and at least 1 post-baseline assessment of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in LAC-MD-31

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-1.862 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.945
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-3.646 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.861
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgChange From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-5.527 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.819
Aclidinium 400 μgChange From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-4.306 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.847
Formoterol 12 μgChange From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-4.059 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.853
Other Pre-specified

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of Study

The TDI measures the change from baseline in severity of breathlessness in symptomatic patients. The TDI contains a rating for 3 categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task, magnitude of effort). TDI scale ranges from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement) including a 0 score to indicate no change. The 3 categories are added to obtain a focal score ranging from -9 (including 0) to +9.

Time frame: Baseline of lead-in study to Week 52 of treatment

Population: The Combined intent to treat (ITT) Population defined as all patients randomized to a treatment group who took at least 1 dose of double-blind investigational product in the lead-in study (LAC-MD-31) and who had a baseline assessment and at least 1 post-baseline assessment of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in LAC-MD-31

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTransition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of Study0.731 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.277
Aclidinium/Formmoterol 400/12 μgTransition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of Study1.812 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.251
Aclidinium/Formoterol 400/6 μgTransition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of Study1.742 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.235
Aclidinium 400 μgTransition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of Study1.596 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
Formoterol 12 μgTransition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at End of Study1.324 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.246

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026