Skip to content

Minerva Pivotal Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System Compared to Hysteroscopic Rollerball Ablation

Minerva Pivotal Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01569763
Enrollment
153
Registered
2012-04-03
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2018-03-02
Last updated
2018-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Menorrhagia

Keywords

endometrial ablation

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System as compared to hysteroscopic rollerball endometrial ablation in reducing menstrual blood loss at 12 months post-treatment.

Detailed description

Menorrhagia is defined as menstrual bleeding in the ovulatory woman exceeding 80 ml per month. Approximately 20-25% of healthy premenopausal women have abnormal uterine bleeding. Menorrhagia can have a negative impact on a woman's lifestyle and self-perception, often leading her to seek definitive treatment. Pharmacologic treatment for menorrhagia is not always successful, and dilatation and curettage typically provides relief for only a few menstrual cycles. Traditionally hysterectomy has been the definitive treatment for menorrhagia. This clinical study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System to provide a therapeutic treatment for menorrhagia due to benign causes by ablating the endometrial lining of the uterus in pre-menopausal women for whom childbearing is complete. Subjects who are randomized to the control group will receive hysteroscopic rollerball/resection ablation. Subjects randomized to the test arm will be treated with the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System.

Interventions

DEVICEAurora Endometrial Ablation

Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system

DEVICERollerball Ablation/Resection

Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation

Sponsors

Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Refractory menorrhagia with no definable organic cause * Female subject from (and including) age 25 to 50 years * Uterine sound measurement of no greater than10.0cm (external os to internal fundus) and a minimum uterine cavity length of 4.0cm * A minimum menstrual blood loss of ≥ 160 ml for two baseline cycles within three months prior to treatment as measured by alkaline hematin extraction; OR, * A minimum menstrual blood loss of ≥ 160 ml for one baseline cycle for women who either * had at least 3 prior months documented failed medical therapy; or * had a contraindication to medical therapy * Premenopausal at enrollment as determined by FSH measurement ≤ 40 IU/L * Not pregnant and no desire to conceive at any time * Subject agrees to use a reliable form of contraception up to the 12-month follow-up visit. If a hormonal birth control method is used for contraception, the subject must have been on said method for ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment and agrees to remain on the same hormonal regimen through the initial 12-month follow-up * Able to provide written informed consent using a form that has been approved by the reviewing IRB/EC * Subject agrees to follow-up exams and data collection requirements * Subject who is literate or demonstrates an understanding on how to collect menstrual blood loss products for the alkaline hematin method of analysis

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or subject with a desire to conceive * Endometrial hyperplasia as confirmed by histology * Presence of active endometritis * Active pelvic inflammatory disease * Active sexually transmitted disease (STD) * Presence of bacteremia, sepsis, or other active systemic infection * Active infection of the genitals, vagina, cervix, uterus or urinary tract at the time of the procedure * Known/suspected abdominal pelvic or gynecological malignancy within the past 5 years * Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders * Untreated/unevaluated cervical dysplasia, except CIN I * Prior uterine surgery (except low segment cesarean section) that interrupts the integrity of the uterine wall (e.g., transmural myomectomy or classical cesarean section) * Previous endometrial ablation procedure * Presence of an implantable (intrauterine) contraceptive device (e.g. Essure™ or Adiana™) * Currently on medications that could thin the myometrial muscle, such as long-term steroid use (except inhaler or nasal therapy for asthma) * Currently on anticoagulants * Abnormal or obstructed cavity as confirmed by hysteroscopy, SIS or vaginal ultrasound * Presence of an intrauterine device (IUD) which the Subject is unwilling to have removed at the time of the operative visit * Subject currently on hormonal birth control therapy (including the Mirena device) for \<3 months prior to enrollment * Subject who is unwilling to use birth control post-ablation whether non-hormonal birth control or the same hormonal birth control therapy as before the procedure * Subject who is within 6-weeks post partum * Any subject who is currently participating or considers future participation in a research study of an investigational drug or device during the course of this investigational study * Any general health condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could represent an increased risk for the subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of Menstrual Bleeding to Normal or Below Normal at 12 Months12 monthsClinical success was defined as a reduction in menstrual bleeding volume to ≤ 80 ml as measured by the alkaline hematin method (AH). Clinical success was not achieved if: (1) at one year post-treatment menstrual blood loss is greater than 80ml, as measured by AH; (2) an acute failure occurred (e.g., aborted procedure, etc.); or (3) the subject required additional therapy to control menorrhagia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure Time< 1 hourProcedure time is defined as the time from device insertion to time of device removal.

Countries

Canada, Mexico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled in the clinical trial at 13 Investigational Sites in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico between March 2012 until November 2013.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 153 subjects were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the Minerva (Aurora) Test Group (n=102) or the Rollerball Control Group (n=51). As part of the randomization process, subjects were stratified by age, though there was no attempt to enroll an equal number into the \< 40 and \> 40 age groups. All 153 subjects were successfully treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aurora Endometrial Ablation
Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Minerva Endometrial Ablation system
102
Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
51
Total153

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAurora Endometrial AblationHysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/AblationTotal
Age, Continuous42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Alkaline Hematin Value at Baseline310.2 Menstrual Blood Loss (ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 169
301.8 Menstrual Blood Loss (ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 176.1
307.4 Menstrual Blood Loss (ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 170.9
Region of Enrollment
Canada
54 participants26 participants80 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
28 participants13 participants41 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants12 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
102 Participants51 Participants153 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 10210 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 1023 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Reduction of Menstrual Bleeding to Normal or Below Normal at 12 Months

Clinical success was defined as a reduction in menstrual bleeding volume to ≤ 80 ml as measured by the alkaline hematin method (AH). Clinical success was not achieved if: (1) at one year post-treatment menstrual blood loss is greater than 80ml, as measured by AH; (2) an acute failure occurred (e.g., aborted procedure, etc.); or (3) the subject required additional therapy to control menorrhagia.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All Randomized subjects in whom treatment was attempted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aurora Endometrial AblationReduction of Menstrual Bleeding to Normal or Below Normal at 12 Months95 participants
Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/AblationReduction of Menstrual Bleeding to Normal or Below Normal at 12 Months41 participants
Secondary

Procedure Time

Procedure time is defined as the time from device insertion to time of device removal.

Time frame: < 1 hour

Population: Subjects completing treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aurora Endometrial AblationProcedure Time3.1 MinutesStandard Deviation 0.5
Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/AblationProcedure Time17.2 MinutesStandard Deviation 6.7
Post Hoc

Subjects With Amenorrhea at 12 Months

Amenorrhea at 12 Months- Number of Subjects experiencing no menstrual bleeding

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aurora Endometrial AblationSubjects With Amenorrhea at 12 Months73 participants
Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/AblationSubjects With Amenorrhea at 12 Months25 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026