Skip to content

Study of the Impact of the Use of a Corset on the Respiratory Function of Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Randomised Open Study of the Efficiency and Tolerance of the Use of a Corset on the Respiratory Function of Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01569360
Acronym
Garchoise
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-04-03
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injury, Tetraplegia

Keywords

Spinal cord injury, Tetraplegia, Paraplegia, Respiratory function, Corset

Brief summary

Corsets are often used in the management of patients with a spinal cord injury. They may help to rigidify the patients' trunk which might help some patients to sit upright; their use may also reduce the sensation of dyspnea some patients have while sitting upright. Due to spinal cord injury, abdominal muscles are weakened which can contribute to alter the respiratory function of the patients. But the corset by rigidifying the abdominal wall can improve the efficiency of the respiratory muscles in some patients and reduce dyspnea in the sitting position for some patients. However, when patients with spinal cord injury are followed over time, one can observe that some patients discontinue corset use. The investigators observed that the patients who pursue the corset use still have a significant improvement of their respiratory function with the corset while the patients who have discontinued the use have improved their respiratory function in the upright position (without the corset). As of now, the investigators do not know whether the use of the corset is discontinued because of a spontaneous improvement of the respiratory function or whether discontinuing the use of the corset may help to develop abdominal spasticity and therefore to improve respiratory function. The investigators seek to investigate this issue in order to optimize the management of patients who present spinal cord injury.

Detailed description

Corsets are widely used in the management of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Their use provides a certain amount of rigidity to the trunk which may help some patients to maintain posture; they also may contribute when used in combination with contention to reduce orthostatic hypotension. Last, they may reduce dyspnea and improve respiratory tolerance while sitting. Indeed, patients with recent SCI worsen their respiratory function in the sitting position secondary to the hypotonia of abdominal muscles which places the diaphragm in a lower and less efficient position. The use of a corset rigidifies the abdominal wall and therefore improves the diaphragm contraction's efficiency leading to an improvement of vital capacity (VC) and a reduction of dyspnea in the sitting position. But although some patients continue to use a corset overtime, others discontinue its use. We recently observed that corset users presented an improvement of VC with corset use proportional to the improvement of VC observed in the supine position while patients who had discontinued its use did not exhibit a reduction of VC between the supine and the upright position suggesting that they presented a more rigid abdominal wall. It is not known whether corset use discontinuation results from the spontaneous improvement respiratory function in the upright position or leads to the appearance of abdominal spasticity and to the improvement of respiratory function. Therefore, we aim to study the effect of the long term corset use on SCI patients' respiratory function. We will conduct a monocentric prospective open study of 56 SCI patients (SCI level ranging from C5 to T8 ASIA A or B) with a recent lesion (\<4 months). The evolution of respiratory function and dyspnea with and without corset use will be studied over a 2 years period. An evaluation of spasticity overtime will also be conducted. After randomization (corset use or not) evaluation will be conducted after 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years and will include: pulmonary function test with and without corset in the upright position and in the supine position, blood gases, dyspnea scores in the different positions and spasticity assessment.

Interventions

DEVICECorset

the patients are assigned the use of a custome made corset during daytime

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients ≥ 18ans * Spinal cord injury with an ASIA score of A or B * Spinal cord injury with an injury level from C5 to T8 (included) * Initial injury \< 4 months * Previous medical examination * Signed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable respiratory state (far from secondary infection or congestion episode) * Refusal to participate to the study * Pregnant or nursing women * Previous corset use * No affiliation to social security system * Impossibility to sustain the sitting position for several weeks or months (due to skin sore or planned surgery …)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vital capacity in the upright and supine position1 hourMeasurement of the vital capacity in the upright and supine position at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood gases15 minutesMeasurement of blood gases (PO2, PCO2 and O2 saturation) at rest at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Borg dyspnéa scale5 minutesevaluation of dyspnea in the supine and in the upright position with the Borg dyspnea scale at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Maximal respiratory pressures30 minutesMeasurement of non invasive maximal respiratory inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) pressures in the upright position at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Penn scale5 minutesEvaluation of spasticity with the Penn scale at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Blood pressure5 minutesEvaluation blood pressure in the upright and in the supine position at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Ashworth scale5 minutesEvaluation of spasticity with the Ashworth scale at day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026