Skip to content

Double Bypass Versus Stent-treatment in Irresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Double Bypass vs Stent Strategy in Peroperatively Diagnosed Irresectable Pancreatic Cancer - A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01569282
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-04-03
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2019-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer, Periampullary Tumor

Keywords

Surgical bypass, Hepaticojejunostomy, Gastrojejunostomy, Biliary stent, Enteral stent

Brief summary

Double bypass (hepaticojejunostomy + gastrojejunostomy) is compared to stent strategy in patients planned for curative pancreatic resection in whom peroperative findings makes resection impossible.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHepaticojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy

Standard surgical techniques

PROCEDUREStent strategy

Biliary and/or enteral stents on demand

Sponsors

Göteborg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Preoperatively * Patients with stent treated tumor in the pancreatic head or periampullary planned for pancreaticoduodenectomy * The patient jaundice should have worn off and there should be no signs of duodenal obstruction * The patient has given informed consent after verbal and written information in accordance with approved ethics application * The patient has no anatomical conditions making endoscopic therapy impossible such as previous Billroth II or Gastric Bypass. 2. Intraoperatively * Peroperative findings of of carcinomatosis, metastases or local irresectability who oppose radical surgery * Surgical double bypass should be technically feasible * The patient has given informed consent after verbal and written information in accordance with approved ethics application

Exclusion criteria

* Peroperative signs of dysfunction on biliary stent * Peroperative findings of gastric outlet obstruction * Surgical double bypass not technically feasible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MorbidityDay 1-30 after randomizationInitial morbidity in association to the laparotomy using the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of lifePreop, 1 month postop and every third monthUsing the EORTC:s QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionaries
Numbers of readmissions to hospitalUp to two years after the laparotomy
The numbers of Surgical, Radiological or Endoscopical therapeutic re-interventionsUp to 24 months after the randomizationThe numbers of surgical, radiological or endoscopical interventions due to jaundice or gastric outlet obstruction from date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026