Skip to content

Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Fostamatinib Compared to Placebo in Patients in Asia With Rheumatoid Arthritis

(OSKIRA-Asia-1): A Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Dose Ranging Study in Asia Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Fostamatinib in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Inadequate Responders to Methotrexate Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01569074
Acronym
OSKIRA-Asia-1
Enrollment
163
Registered
2012-04-02
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2014-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of four dosing regimens of fostamatinib compared to placebo, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are taking methotrexate but not responding. The study will last for 12 weeks.

Detailed description

(OSKIRA-Asia-1): A Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Dose Ranging Study in Asia Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Fostamatinib in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis who are Inadequate Responders to Methotrexate Therapy

Interventions

DRUGFostamatinib

Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo twice daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female aged 18 and over * Active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed after the age of 16 * 6 or more swollen joints and 6 or more tender/painful joints from certain joints in the hands, wrists, arms and knees * At least one of: positive result for rheumatoid factor test, either in the past or currently (blood test); x-ray showing bone erosion within the last 12 months; presence of certain antibodies in the blood (blood test) * Currently taking methotrexate for at least 4 months (and on a stable dose for at least 6 weeks)

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are pregnant or breast feeding * Certain inflammatory conditions (other than rheumatoid arthritis), connective tissue diseases or chronic pain disorders. * Previously taken, but not responded to, certain biological treatments for rheumatoid arthritis * High blood pressure that is not controlled by medication * Low levels of neutrophils in the blood (blood test).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo12 weeksACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo12 weeksACR50: American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo12 weeksACR70: American College of Rheumatology 70% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.
ACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 12Baseline and 12 weeksACRn: American College of Rheumatology index of RA improvement, based on smallest percentage improvement in the count of swollen joints (out of 28 joints), count of tender joints (out of 28 joints), or in blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) or the physician or patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Scores are reported as a percentage improvement on a scale of -100 to +100, with larger values representing a better clinical outcome. Mean refers to change at Week 12. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.
Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo12 weeksDAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patient's own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. DAS28-CRP score of \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, , DMARD = disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once daily.
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo1 weekACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally.
Proportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo12 weeksHAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, a measure of physical function. The HAQ-DI score is calculated by summing scores from 8 sub-categories (ie, scores for patient ability in dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities) and dividing by the number of categories completed. The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with higher score indicating greater disability. HAQ-DI response is a reduction from baseline in HAQ-DI greater than or equal to the minimally important difference (0.22). BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day.
SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 12Baseline and 12 weeksSF-36 = 36-item Short Form Health Survey, as a measure of health related quality of life. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in scores at Week 12. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.
SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 12Baseline and 12 weeksSF-36 = 36-item Short Form Health Survey, as a measure of health related quality of life. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in scores at Week 12. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.
Proportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo12 weeksChange from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 was derived and categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. BID = twice a day, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Countries

Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 298 patients were enrolled: 31, 33, 33, 33 & 33 were randomised to Groups A, B, C, D & E respectively (all received at least 1 dose of investigational product).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 135 patients failed screening.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FOSTA 100 MG BID PO
Dosing Group A
31
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD PO
Dosing Group B
33
FOSTA 75 MG BID PO
Dosing Group C
33
FOSTA 50 MG BID PO
Dosing Group D
33
PLACEBO PO
Dosing Group E
33
Total163

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event10300
Overall Studyeg change in circumstances02011
Overall StudySevere non-compliance to protocol00100
Overall StudyStudy-specific discontinuation criteria01000
Overall StudyStudy stopped66877

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFOSTA 100 MG BID POFOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POFOSTA 75 MG BID POFOSTA 50 MG BID POPLACEBO POTotal
Age, Continuous51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
31 Participants33 Participants33 Participants33 Participants33 Participants163 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indian or Pakistani
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants25 Participants27 Participants31 Participants28 Participants142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants8 Participants6 Participants2 Participants5 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 3117 / 3317 / 3316 / 3315 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 311 / 333 / 330 / 331 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo53.8 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo55.2 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo25.9 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo46.4 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo32.1 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.05980% CI: [0.07, 0.39]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.05480% CI: [0.08, 0.39]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.5780% CI: [-0.2, 0.08]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.26280% CI: [-0.02, 0.29]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

ACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 12

ACRn: American College of Rheumatology index of RA improvement, based on smallest percentage improvement in the count of swollen joints (out of 28 joints), count of tender joints (out of 28 joints), or in blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) or the physician or patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Scores are reported as a percentage improvement on a scale of -100 to +100, with larger values representing a better clinical outcome. Mean refers to change at Week 12. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FOSTA 100 MG BID POACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 1225.52 Percentage improvement from baselineStandard Deviation 37.029
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 1224.18 Percentage improvement from baselineStandard Deviation 39.925
FOSTA 75 MG BID POACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 123.59 Percentage improvement from baselineStandard Deviation 29.774
FOSTA 50 MG BID POACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 1215.88 Percentage improvement from baselineStandard Deviation 24.354
PLACEBO POACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 1210.94 Percentage improvement from baselineStandard Deviation 28.302
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.073Van Elteren
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.065Van Elteren
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.317Van Elteren
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.263Van Elteren
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally.

Time frame: 1 week

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. The fostamatinib 100 mg BID combined group contains 31 patients from Dosing Group A and 33 patients from Dosing Group B.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo21.2 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo18.2 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo15.2 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo25.0 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.17280% CI: [0.01, 0.21]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.48980% CI: [-0.05, 0.18]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.70480% CI: [-0.08, 0.15]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

ACR50: American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo30.8 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo34.5 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo7.4 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo10.7 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo14.3 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.11480% CI: [0.03, 0.31]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.03580% CI: [0.08, 0.34]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.33480% CI: [-0.17, 0.02]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.64580% CI: [-0.13, 0.06]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

ACR70: American College of Rheumatology 70% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo11.5 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo13.8 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo0 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo0 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo0 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.02880% CI: [0.05, 0.19]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.02180% CI: [0.06, 0.22]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patient's own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. DAS28-CRP score of \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, , DMARD = disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once daily.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo34.6 Percentage of responders 0.81
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo34.5 Percentage of responders 0.82
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo22.2 Percentage of responders 0.77
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo17.9 Percentage of responders 0.75
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP<=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo10.7 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation appliedp-value: 0.03380% CI: [1.94, 14.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.03380% CI: [1.92, 13.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.25780% CI: [0.89, 6.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.48180% CI: [0.63, 5.04]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 was derived and categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. BID = twice a day, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboNo response30.8 Percentage of responders 1.46
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboGood response34.6 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboModerate response34.6 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboModerate response24.1 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboNo response41.4 Percentage of responders 1.34
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboGood response34.5 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboModerate response29.6 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboNo response48.1 Percentage of responders 1.3
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboGood response22.2 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboNo response17.9 Percentage of responders 1.58
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboGood response17.9 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboModerate response64.3 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboModerate response53.6 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboNo response35.7 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients With DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and PlaceboGood response10.7 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.13180% CI: [1.12, 4.2]Proportional odds model
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.42380% CI: [0.79, 2.82]Proportional odds model
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.78180% CI: [0.45, 1.67]Proportional odds model
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.23980% CI: [0.95, 3.44]Proportional odds model
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo

HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, a measure of physical function. The HAQ-DI score is calculated by summing scores from 8 sub-categories (ie, scores for patient ability in dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities) and dividing by the number of categories completed. The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with higher score indicating greater disability. HAQ-DI response is a reduction from baseline in HAQ-DI greater than or equal to the minimally important difference (0.22). BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FOSTA 100 MG BID POProportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo69.2 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POProportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo48.3 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 75 MG BID POProportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo44.4 Percentage of responders
FOSTA 50 MG BID POProportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo46.4 Percentage of responders
PLACEBO POProportion of Patients With HAQ-DI Response at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo50.0 Percentage of responders
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.16980% CI: [1.06, 4.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.83380% CI: [0.45, 1.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.61480% CI: [0.37, 1.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.74880% CI: [0.42, 1.69]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 12

SF-36 = 36-item Short Form Health Survey, as a measure of health related quality of life. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in scores at Week 12. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FOSTA 100 MG BID POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 127 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 126 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
FOSTA 75 MG BID POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 122 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
FOSTA 50 MG BID POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 125 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
PLACEBO POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 124 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.13980% CI: [0.42, 5.82]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.22380% CI: [-0.13, 5.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.43280% CI: [-4.3, 1.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.48180% CI: [-1.19, 4.09]ANCOVA
Secondary

SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 12

SF-36 = 36-item Short Form Health Survey, as a measure of health related quality of life. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in scores at Week 12. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FOSTA 100 MG BID POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 127 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 124 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
FOSTA 75 MG BID POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 123 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
FOSTA 50 MG BID POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 125 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
PLACEBO POSF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 123 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.08780% CI: [0.76, 5.26]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.88180% CI: [-1.91, 2.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.80680% CI: [-2.64, 1.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. Subjects who prematurely withdrew due to project closure have no imputation applied.p-value: 0.54880% CI: [-1.17, 3.23]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026