Skip to content

Reduction in YEllow Plaque by Aggressive Lipid LOWering Therapy

Reduction in YEllow Plaque by Aggressive Lipid LOWering Therapy. (YELLOW Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01567826
Acronym
YELLOW
Enrollment
87
Registered
2012-03-30
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2017-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

YELLO, Atorvastatin, Simvastatin, Rosuvastatin, lipid therapy, Statin therapy, Coronary artery disease, CHD

Brief summary

The study will assess the regression of yellow plaque content of the lipid pool after aggressive lipid therapy by utilizing NIR spectroscopy. Statin therapy using Rosuvastatin 10-40 mg will be compared to the statin therapy of either Atorvastatin or Simvastatin. This is a single site study. A total of 100 subjects will randomized, of which 40 will receive intensive lipid therapy (Rosuvastatin 40mg) and 40 will receive standard care lipid lowering therapy.

Detailed description

Coronary artery disease (CHD) remains to be a leading cause of death in most countries (1) (2). It is well known that reducing cholesterol level by statin therapy is associated with significant reduction in plaque burden. REVERSAL (3) and ASTEROID (4) trials showed that in patients with coronary artery disease lipid-lowering with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin respectively reduced progression of coronary atherosclerosis and even cause repression of some lesions. CHD clinical events are related to plaque instability due to lipid content within the atherosclerotic plaque. High dose atorvastatin has shown to reduce the plaque lipid contents on serial IVUS analysis at 12 months. Therefore reduction in lipid content and thereby the plaque burden by lipid lowering therapy may stabilize the plaque and reduce cardiovascular events. High sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) is an inflammatory biomarker that independently predicts future vascular events. In JUPITER (5) trial rosuvastatin (Crestor) significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events in apparently healthy people with elevated HsCRP. IVUS was utilized to demonstrate change in coronary artery vessel wall morphology over a relatively short period of time, but provided no data on the lipid content in the vessel wall. The application of NIR spectroscopy to identify lipid deposition within coronary arteries has been validated in ex vivo studies. Infrared spectra are collected as follows: Light of discrete wavelengths from a laser is directed onto the tissue sample via glass fibers. Light scattered from the samples is collected in fibers and launched into a spectrometer. The plot of signal intensity as a function of wavelength was used to develop chemometric models to discriminate lipid-cores from non-atherosclerotic tissue, and from atherosclerotic tissue that is predominantly fibrotic and from blood elements.

Interventions

DRUGstandard of care lipid therapy

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either A) Rosuvastatin (Crestor) 40mg daily, or B) standard-care lipid-lowering therapy. Zocor, Lipitor \[any dose\] and Crestor \[less than 40mg\]

DRUGAggressive lipid therapy

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either A) Rosuvastatin (Crestor) 40mg daily, or B) standard-care lipid-lowering therapy.

Sponsors

Annapoorna Kini
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient \> 18 years of age and willing to participate * Stable patients who will undergo cardiac catheterization and PCI (intent to stent) * Patient is willing to go on a cholesterol lowering medication for the duration of the study and willing to change statin therapy to the randomized statin therapy regardless of previous statin therapy and dose (e.g. Atorvastatin 80 mg) Patients that are screened for this study and are receiving another Statin such as Pravachol will be required to be willing to change their therapy to Rosuvastatin as per is randomization. If patients are receiving another statin, such as pravachol, or any other agent, and are at appropriate Lipid levels, they will be permitted to continue this therapy (if randomized to the standard therapy arm). There are a virtually unlimited number of possible scenarios for potential combination of all Lipid lowering agents at the time of enrollment that patients may be taking. * Signed written Informed Consent * Women of childbearing potential must agree to be on an acceptable method of birth control/contraceptive such as barrier method (condoms/diaphragm); hormonal contraceptives (birth control pills, implants (Norplant) or injections (Depo-Provera)); Intrauterine Device; or abstinence (no sexual activity). * Fluency in English and/or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have acute myocardial infarction (Q wave or non-Q wave with CK-MB \> 5 times above the upper normal (31.5 ng/ml) within 72 hours) * Patients who are in cardiogenic shock * Patients with left main disease or restenotic lesions * Patients with elevated CK-MB (\> 6.5 ng/ml) or Tnl (\> 0.5ng/L) at baseline * Patients with platelet count \< 100,000 cell/mm3 * Patients who have co-morbidity which reduces life expectancy to one year * Patients who are currently participating in another investigational drug/device study * Patients with known hypersensitivity to HMG CO-A reductase therapy (statins) * Patients with liver disease * Patient with creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL * Pregnant women and women of childbearing potential who intend to have children during the duration of the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after interventionThe regression of yellow plaque content from the atherosclerotic lipid pool after statin therapy by utilizing NIR spectroscopy as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Spectroscopic information obtained from raw spectra was transformed into a probability of lipid core that was mapped to a red-to-yellow color scale, with the low probability of lipid shown as red and the high probability of lipid shown as yellow. Analyses were performed offline using the Matlab-based software, as previously published. Yellow pixels within the analyzed segment were divided by all viable pixels to generate the lipid-core burden index (LCBI). The maximal value of LCBI for each nonculprit obstructive lesion was recorded and used for comparison.
LCBI4mm Maxat baseline and at 6-8 weeks after interventionLCBI4mm max = change in lipid-core burden index at the 4-mm maximal segment. Spectroscopic information obtained from raw spectra was transformed into a probability of lipid core that was mapped to a red-to-yellow color scale, with the low probability of lipid shown as red and the high probability of lipid shown as yellow. Yellow pixels within the analyzed segment were divided by all viable pixels to generate the lipid-core burden index (LCBI). The maximal value of LCBI for each nonculprit obstructive lesion was recorded and used for comparison.
Change in LCBI4mm Maxat baseline and at 6-8 weeks after interventionChange in LCBI4mm max at 6-8 weeks after intervention as compared to baseline. LCBI4mm max = change in lipid-core burden index at the 4-mm maximal segment.
Change in LCBI, Lesionat baseline and at 6-8 weeks post interventionChange in LCBI at 6-8 weeks after intervention as compared to baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)at 6-8 weeks after interventionMACE defined as a combined clinical endpoint of death, MI (Q wave or non Q-wave with CK-MB \>3 times above the upper normal limit (48 U/L), urgent revascularization or stroke at 30 days and 1 year. Details reported in adverse events section.
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parametersat baseline and at 6-8 weeks after interventionChange in atheroma volume and lumen CSA on IVUS as related to change in yellow plaque index as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Data not analyzed. Data not available.
Blood Chemistry - HsCRPat baseline and at 6-8 weeks after interventionCorrelation of yellow plaque index with changes in levels of blood HsCRP as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Valueat baseline and at 6-8 weeks after interventionChange in FFR as related to change in yellow plaque index as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), defined as the ratio of maximum flow in the presence of a stenosis to normal maximum flow, is a lesion-specific index of stenosis severity that can be calculated by simultaneous measurement of mean arterial, distal coronary, and central venous pressure.
Diameter StenosisBaseline and 6-8 weeks post interventionPercentage stenosis of vessel diameter in the analysis segment of nontarget lesions as measured by angiography that remained \>70%, after successful PCI of the target lesion.
Post PCI Cardiac Enzymesat 6-8 weeks after interventionCorrelation of yellow plaque index with post procedure CK-MB, Troponin-I release.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

779 patients consecutive patients with chronic stable angina presenting for elective coronary angiography were screened from May 21, 2010 until Jan 10, 2012. 87 participants met criteria and were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy
standard-care lipid-lowering therapy: Zocor or Lipitor standard of care lipid therapy: Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either A) Rosuvastatin (Crestor) 40mg daily, or B) standard-care lipid-lowering therapy. Zocor, Lipitor \[any dose\] and Crestor \[less than 40mg\]
43
Aggressive Lipid Therapy
aggressive lipid therapy: Crestor Aggressive lipid therapy: Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either A) Rosuvastatin (Crestor) 40mg daily, or B) standard-care lipid-lowering therapy.
44
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalStandard of Care Lipid TherapyAggressive Lipid Therapy
ACE-I/ARB use
no
52 participants24 participants28 participants
ACE-I/ARB use
yes
35 participants19 participants16 participants
Age, Continuous63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29
Beta-blocker use
no
24 participants13 participants11 participants
Beta-blocker use
yes
63 participants30 participants33 participants
Creatinine1.04 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
1.1 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
1.0 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
Current tobacco use
no
74 participants39 participants35 participants
Current tobacco use
yes
13 participants4 participants9 participants
Diabetes mellitus
no
79 participants40 participants39 participants
Diabetes mellitus
yes
8 participants3 participants5 participants
Hypercholesterolemia
no
8 participants3 participants5 participants
Hypercholesterolemia
yes
79 participants40 participants39 participants
Hypertension
no
7 participants3 participants4 participants
Hypertension
yes
80 participants40 participants40 participants
LAD Coronary vessel
no
50 participants26 participants24 participants
LAD Coronary vessel
yes
37 participants17 participants20 participants
LCx coronary vessel
no
59 participants29 participants30 participants
LCx coronary vessel
yes
28 participants14 participants14 participants
Previous MI
no
71 participants35 participants36 participants
Previous MI
yes
16 participants8 participants8 participants
Previous PCI
no
51 participants23 participants28 participants
Previous PCI
yes
36 participants20 participants16 participants
Prior CVA/TIA
no
82 participants40 participants42 participants
Prior CVA/TIA
yes
5 participants3 participants2 participants
RCA coronary vessel
no
64 participants30 participants34 participants
RCA coronary vessel
yes
23 participants13 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants31 Participants35 Participants
Statin Use
no
15 participants8 participants7 participants
Statin Use
yes
72 participants35 participants37 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 437 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 433 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Change in LCBI4mm Max

Change in LCBI4mm max at 6-8 weeks after intervention as compared to baseline. LCBI4mm max = change in lipid-core burden index at the 4-mm maximal segment.

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

Population: Data were not available in 17 patients because of loss to follow-up (n = 5), incorrect image formatting that could not be recovered at the time of core laboratory analysis (n = 5), NIRS console/catheter malfunction at the time of index PCI (n = 3), and loss of disc integrity or corruption before core laboratory analysis (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyChange in LCBI4mm Max2.4 ratio
Aggressive Lipid TherapyChange in LCBI4mm Max-149.1 ratio
p-value: 0.01ANCOVA
Primary

Change in LCBI, Lesion

Change in LCBI at 6-8 weeks after intervention as compared to baseline

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks post intervention

Population: Data were not available in 17 patients because of loss to follow-up (n = 5), incorrect image formatting that could not be recovered at the time of core laboratory analysis (n = 5), NIRS console/catheter malfunction at the time of index PCI (n = 3), and loss of disc integrity or corruption before core laboratory analysis (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyChange in LCBI, Lesion8.0 ratio
Aggressive Lipid TherapyChange in LCBI, Lesion-22.5 ratio
p-value: 0.02ANCOVA
Primary

LCBI4mm Max

LCBI4mm max = change in lipid-core burden index at the 4-mm maximal segment. Spectroscopic information obtained from raw spectra was transformed into a probability of lipid core that was mapped to a red-to-yellow color scale, with the low probability of lipid shown as red and the high probability of lipid shown as yellow. Yellow pixels within the analyzed segment were divided by all viable pixels to generate the lipid-core burden index (LCBI). The maximal value of LCBI for each nonculprit obstructive lesion was recorded and used for comparison.

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

Population: Data were not available in 17 patients because of loss to follow-up (n = 5), incorrect image formatting that could not be recovered at the time of core laboratory analysis (n = 5), NIRS console/catheter malfunction at the time of index PCI (n = 3), and loss of disc integrity or corruption before core laboratory analysis (n = 4).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyLCBI4mm MaxBaseline LCBI4mm max356.7 ratio
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyLCBI4mm MaxFollow-up LCBI4mm max385.7 ratio
Aggressive Lipid TherapyLCBI4mm MaxBaseline LCBI4mm max490.6 ratio
Aggressive Lipid TherapyLCBI4mm MaxFollow-up LCBI4mm max336.1 ratio
Primary

Lipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)

The regression of yellow plaque content from the atherosclerotic lipid pool after statin therapy by utilizing NIR spectroscopy as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Spectroscopic information obtained from raw spectra was transformed into a probability of lipid core that was mapped to a red-to-yellow color scale, with the low probability of lipid shown as red and the high probability of lipid shown as yellow. Analyses were performed offline using the Matlab-based software, as previously published. Yellow pixels within the analyzed segment were divided by all viable pixels to generate the lipid-core burden index (LCBI). The maximal value of LCBI for each nonculprit obstructive lesion was recorded and used for comparison.

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

Population: Data were not available in 17 patients because of loss to follow-up (n = 5), incorrect image formatting that could not be recovered at the time of core laboratory analysis (n = 5), NIRS console/catheter malfunction at the time of index PCI (n = 3), and loss of disc integrity or corruption before core laboratory analysis (n = 4).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyLipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)Baseline LCBI, lesion95.4 ratio
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyLipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)Follow-up LCBI, lesion99.9 ratio
Aggressive Lipid TherapyLipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)Baseline LCBI, lesion132.4 ratio
Aggressive Lipid TherapyLipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)Follow-up LCBI, lesion99.8 ratio
Secondary

Blood Chemistry - HsCRP

Correlation of yellow plaque index with changes in levels of blood HsCRP as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyBlood Chemistry - HsCRPBaseline1.7 mg/l
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyBlood Chemistry - HsCRPFollow-Up1.9 mg/l
Aggressive Lipid TherapyBlood Chemistry - HsCRPBaseline1.7 mg/l
Aggressive Lipid TherapyBlood Chemistry - HsCRPFollow-Up1.2 mg/l
Secondary

Diameter Stenosis

Percentage stenosis of vessel diameter in the analysis segment of nontarget lesions as measured by angiography that remained \>70%, after successful PCI of the target lesion.

Time frame: Baseline and 6-8 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyDiameter StenosisBaseline79.9 percentage of lesions
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyDiameter StenosisFollow-up83 percentage of lesions
Aggressive Lipid TherapyDiameter StenosisBaseline79.6 percentage of lesions
Aggressive Lipid TherapyDiameter StenosisFollow-up79.4 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Value

Change in FFR as related to change in yellow plaque index as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), defined as the ratio of maximum flow in the presence of a stenosis to normal maximum flow, is a lesion-specific index of stenosis severity that can be calculated by simultaneous measurement of mean arterial, distal coronary, and central venous pressure.

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) ValueBaseline0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) ValueFollow-up0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1
Aggressive Lipid TherapyFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) ValueBaseline0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1
Aggressive Lipid TherapyFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) ValueFollow-up0.75 ratioStandard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters

Change in atheroma volume and lumen CSA on IVUS as related to change in yellow plaque index as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Data not analyzed. Data not available.

Time frame: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) ParametersBaseline Total atheroma volume193.7 mm^2Standard Deviation 61.7
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters6-8 weeks Total atheroma volume199.6 mm^2Standard Deviation 63.9
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) ParametersBaseline Lumen CSA2.4 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.6
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters6-8 weeks Lumen CSA2.4 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.7
Aggressive Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters6-8 weeks Lumen CSA2.5 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.7
Aggressive Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) ParametersBaseline Total atheroma volume195.8 mm^2Standard Deviation 63.3
Aggressive Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) ParametersBaseline Lumen CSA2.5 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.8
Aggressive Lipid TherapyIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters6-8 weeks Total atheroma volume209.6 mm^2Standard Deviation 74.1
Secondary

Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

MACE defined as a combined clinical endpoint of death, MI (Q wave or non Q-wave with CK-MB \>3 times above the upper normal limit (48 U/L), urgent revascularization or stroke at 30 days and 1 year. Details reported in adverse events section.

Time frame: at 6-8 weeks after intervention

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyMajor Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)2 participants
Aggressive Lipid TherapyMajor Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)3 participants
Secondary

Post PCI Cardiac Enzymes

Correlation of yellow plaque index with post procedure CK-MB, Troponin-I release.

Time frame: at 6-8 weeks after intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyPost PCI Cardiac EnzymesCK-MB5.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9
Standard of Care Lipid TherapyPost PCI Cardiac EnzymesTroponin-I0.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1
Aggressive Lipid TherapyPost PCI Cardiac EnzymesCK-MB3.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
Aggressive Lipid TherapyPost PCI Cardiac EnzymesTroponin-I0.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026