Age Factors, Blast Injuries, Brain Injuries
Conditions
Keywords
Central Auditory Processing, Traumatic Brain Injury, Hearing Loss
Brief summary
The current conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq have resulted in unprecedented rates of exposure to high-intensity blasts and resulting brain injury. This research team has established that recently blast-exposed Soldiers show differences from controls on tests of central auditory function. This project will 1) develop a more accurate estimate of the prevalence of central auditory dysfunction among Veterans exposed to blasts over the past ten years, 2) identify the functional outcomes associated with abnormal performance on tests of central processing, and 3) improve understanding of the ways in which blast-exposure resembles and differs from both the normal aging process and non-blast-related TBI in terms of performance on tests of central auditory processing.
Detailed description
The current conflicts in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom; OEF) and Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom; OIF) have resulted in unprecedented rates of exposure to high-intensity blasts and resulting brain injury. Dennis (2009) reports that during 2005-2007, 68% of U.S. military personnel injured in the OEF/OIF conflicts had blast-related injuries and 28%-31% of those evacuated to Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC), Washington, DC had brain injuries. While the common focus of auditory evaluation is on damage to the peripheral auditory system, the prevalence of brain injury among those exposed to high-intensity blasts suggests that damage to the central auditory system is an equally important concern for the blast-exposed Veteran. Discussions with clinical audiologists and OEF/OIF Veterans Service Office personnel suggest that a common complaint voiced by blast-exposed Veterans is an inability to understand speech in noisy environments, even when peripheral hearing is within normal or near-normal limits (see attached letters of support). Such complaints are consistent with damage to neural networks responsible for higher-order auditory processing. This proposal is the second phase of a research project focused on examining the degree to which central auditory processing (CAP) dysfunction is a result of blast exposure. Over the initial period of funding, data collection at WRAMC and the VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR) established that CAP dysfunction is present in Warfighters exposed to high-intensity blasts while serving in combat. Recently blast-exposed patients with and without diagnoses of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) tested at WRAMC showed differences from controls tested at NCRAR on one or more behavioral and neurophysiological tests used to evaluate central auditory function. This project will 1) develop a more accurate estimate of the prevalence of central auditory dysfunction among Veterans exposed to blasts over the past ten years, 2) identify the functional outcomes associated with abnormal performance on tests of central processing, and 3) improve understanding of the ways in which blast-exposure resembles and differs from both the normal aging process and non-blast-related TBI in terms of performance on tests of central auditory processing. Key Question 1: To what extent is CAP dysfunction observable among OEF/OIF Veterans who have been exposed to high intensity blasts? Based on preliminary data, the investigators hypothesize that the rate of abnormal performance on behavioral and neurophysiological tests of CAP dysfunction will be higher in a group of Veterans exposed to blasts than it will be in a control group of similar ages and hearing thresholds who have not been exposed to blasts. Key Question 2: How well can behavioral and neurophysiological tests of CAP predict functional auditory deficits measured behaviorally and through self report? It is hypothesized that tests of CAP ability will predict performance in a testing situation involving multiple talkers delivering competing messages. CAP tests will also correlate with responses blast-exposed Veterans make on the Speech and Spatial Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaire, designed to examine functional hearing ability in various acoustically complex environments. Key Question 3: To what extent do blast-exposed Veterans resemble older listeners and participants with mild TBI who have not been exposed to blasts in their performance on CAP tests and functional tests of hearing? It is hypothesized that comparisons of the blast-exposed group with an older group with matched pure-tone sensitivity and an age- and hearing-matched group with non-blast-related TBI will be consistent with premature aging in the blast-exposed group but demonstrate substantive differences with the non-blast group.
Interventions
All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 18-90 * Pure-tone sensitivity of 40 dB HL or better at all audiometric frequencies below 8 kHz * English as first language. Group membership inclusion criteria: Group 1: Blast exposed Veterans * Report having been exposed to high-intensity blast during the ten years prior to enrollment * Cognitive and physical ability to take part in these auditory evaluations Group 2. Non-blast TBI group * Diagnosed with mild-to-moderate TBI Group 3. Age matched control group -18-59 years. Group 4. Older control group * 60-90 years. * Older group will be aged 60 and older Audiometric status of these groups will be required to meet the same
Exclusion criteria
as that of the other two groups described above
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | six months | Tests to be administered: Dichotic Digits Test: Percentage of digits reported correctly from 0 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) Gaps in Noise Test: Approximate threshold in milliseconds from 2 (best) to 20 (worst) Staggered Spondaic Words Test: Total number of errors from 0 (best) to 40 (worst) Masking Level Differences Test: Difference in threshold between diotic and dichotic stimuli in decibels from 0 (worst) to 24 (best) Frequency Pattern Test: Percentage of sequences reported correctly from 0 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) Adaptive Tests of Temporal Resolution: Not reported due to software error in stimulus presentation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings of Self-reported Ability to Process Auditory Information in Various Settings | six months | Hearing Health Inventory for Adults is a 25 item questionnaire that asks participants to rank how often auditory issues create problems in daily life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater perceived levels of handicap. |
| Functional Hearing Ability in Multitalker Environments | six months | The Functional Hearing Questionnaire (FHQ), developed for veterans with brain injuries was used to evaluate self perceived hearing difficulties. The FHQ is a nine item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their level of difficulty hearing in different circumstances on a four point scale. Scores range from 9 to 36, with higher scores indicating a greater level of difficulty. |
| Percent Change in P2 Component of Electrophysiological Response | six months | Average change in amplitude of the P2 component of the electrophysiological response to paired clicks. Habituation to the clicks is anticipated, resulting in a large percentage change in amplitude to the second click. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control Non-blast-exposed and non-TBI, aged younger than 50
Diagnostic: All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities. | 21 |
| Blast Blast-exposed with or without a TBI diagnosis
Diagnostic: All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities. | 41 |
| Non-Blast-Exposed TBI Non-blast-exposed with TBI diagnosis
Diagnostic: All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities. | 18 |
| Older Non-blast-exposed and non-TBI, aged 50 or older
Diagnostic: All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities. | 10 |
| Total | 90 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Blast | Non-Blast-Exposed TBI | Control | Older | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 41 Participants | 18 Participants | 21 Participants | 8 Participants | 88 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 38.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 40.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 31.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 | 56.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 | 38.82 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 41 Participants | 18 Participants | 21 Participants | 10 Participants | 90 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 39 Participants | 16 Participants | 14 Participants | 7 Participants | 76 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 28 | 0 / 46 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 28 | 0 / 46 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 11 |
Outcome results
Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing
Tests to be administered: Dichotic Digits Test: Percentage of digits reported correctly from 0 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) Gaps in Noise Test: Approximate threshold in milliseconds from 2 (best) to 20 (worst) Staggered Spondaic Words Test: Total number of errors from 0 (best) to 40 (worst) Masking Level Differences Test: Difference in threshold between diotic and dichotic stimuli in decibels from 0 (worst) to 24 (best) Frequency Pattern Test: Percentage of sequences reported correctly from 0 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) Adaptive Tests of Temporal Resolution: Not reported due to software error in stimulus presentation
Time frame: six months
Population: Note that some of the participants finished all of the primary outcome measures but withdrew without finishing all of the secondary tests. They are thus listed as having withdrawn but are still included here for completeness.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Frequency Pattern Test (RE) | 95.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Control | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Gaps in Noise (RE) | 4.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Control | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Masking Level Difference | 13.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Control | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Staggerred Spondaic Words (Total Errors) | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Control | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Dichotic Digits (RE) | 99.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Blast | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Staggerred Spondaic Words (Total Errors) | 7.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Blast | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Frequency Pattern Test (RE) | 86.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Blast | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Masking Level Difference | 12.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Blast | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Gaps in Noise (RE) | 6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Blast | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Dichotic Digits (RE) | 95.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Non-Blast-Exposed TBI | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Staggerred Spondaic Words (Total Errors) | 5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.04 |
| Non-Blast-Exposed TBI | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Dichotic Digits (RE) | 96.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Non-Blast-Exposed TBI | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Gaps in Noise (RE) | 5.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Non-Blast-Exposed TBI | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Frequency Pattern Test (RE) | 84.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
| Non-Blast-Exposed TBI | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Masking Level Difference | 12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Older | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Frequency Pattern Test (RE) | 90.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Older | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Gaps in Noise (RE) | 4.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Older | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Dichotic Digits (RE) | 97.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Older | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Staggerred Spondaic Words (Total Errors) | 4.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Older | Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing | Masking Level Difference | 9.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Functional Hearing Ability in Multitalker Environments
The Functional Hearing Questionnaire (FHQ), developed for veterans with brain injuries was used to evaluate self perceived hearing difficulties. The FHQ is a nine item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their level of difficulty hearing in different circumstances on a four point scale. Scores range from 9 to 36, with higher scores indicating a greater level of difficulty.
Time frame: six months
Population: Not all participants were available for further testing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Functional Hearing Ability in Multitalker Environments | 15.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| Blast | Functional Hearing Ability in Multitalker Environments | 19.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
Percent Change in P2 Component of Electrophysiological Response
Average change in amplitude of the P2 component of the electrophysiological response to paired clicks. Habituation to the clicks is anticipated, resulting in a large percentage change in amplitude to the second click.
Time frame: six months
Population: This analysis was only conducted on a subset of the sample, as not all were available for further testing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Percent Change in P2 Component of Electrophysiological Response | 65.74 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 13.8 |
| Blast | Percent Change in P2 Component of Electrophysiological Response | 51.87 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 16 |
Ratings of Self-reported Ability to Process Auditory Information in Various Settings
Hearing Health Inventory for Adults is a 25 item questionnaire that asks participants to rank how often auditory issues create problems in daily life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater perceived levels of handicap.
Time frame: six months
Population: Not all participants were available for further testing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Ratings of Self-reported Ability to Process Auditory Information in Various Settings | 6.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.8 |
| Blast | Ratings of Self-reported Ability to Process Auditory Information in Various Settings | 32.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.33 |