Skip to content

Vet-Harts Pilot Intervention for Veterans With Coronary Heart Disease

Representational Telehealth Nursing Intervention for Veterans With CHD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01566214
Acronym
VHPI
Enrollment
12
Registered
2012-03-29
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2018-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Disease

Keywords

coronary heart disease (CHD), myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndromes (ACS)

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to survey patients to learn about their beliefs and behaviors related to the management of heart disease and to discuss options for making healthy lifestyle changes. From the information the investigators get from patients, the investigators hope to develop better methods for taking care of patients who have heart disease.

Detailed description

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a significant health threat among veterans. Compared to their civilian counterparts, veterans experience greater disability, reinfarction, and mortality following myocardial infarction (MI) and other acute coronary syndromes (ACS). High rates of hypertension, diabetes, and cardiac risk behaviors (e.g., smoking) and low socioeconomic status (SES) further increase veterans' CHD-related morbidity and mortality. The proposed pilot project will establish the feasibility of a telehealth nursing intervention for veterans with CHD who are recovering from MI/ACS. The Veterans Heart Attack Representations Telehealth (Vet-HART) intervention is designed to promote adaptive conceptual change in veterans' beliefs (common sense models or representations) about CHD etiology and self-management and facilitate health behavior changes (e.g., smoking cessation, medication adherence, diet management, and increased physical activity). The long-term goal of this research program is to improve veterans' quality of life (QoL) and reduce their CHD-related morbidity/mortality. The proposed project is the requisite next step in attaining that goal.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interview

For those subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group, information from their MIHART assessment interview and medical record review will be used to select intervention scripts optimally tailored to each subjects' unique configuration of beliefs and risk factors and they will be re-contacted by telephone at 2-weeks post-hospital discharge to deliver the Vet-HART intervention. The intervention will be administered by a trained research assistant via telephone, working from a semi-structured script tailored to each subject's representations and risk factors, the call will last about 15-30 minutes.

Sponsors

University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission to an inpatient medicine unit for MI, ACS, and coronary angiography * Age

Exclusion criteria

* Altered mental status * Language barriers * Dementia or Cognitive Impairment * Diagnostic Study * Resident in long-term care facility prior to the present admission * Planned discharge to a skilled or intermediate care facility or hospice * Lack of access to a functioning phone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF-36v Physical Function ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargePhysical Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v Role Limitations Due to Physical Health ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeRole Limitations Due to Physical Health Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeRole Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v Energy-Fatigue ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeEnergy-Fatigue Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v Emotional Well-Being ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeEmotional Well-Being Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v Social Functioning ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeSocial Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v Pain ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargePain Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
SF-36v General Health ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeGeneral Health Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Physical Limitations ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargePhysical Limitations Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Stability ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeAngina Stability Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeAngina Frequency Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Treatment Satisfaction ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeTreatment Satisfaction Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Disease Perception ScaleChange from baseline to 3-months post hospital dischargeDisease Perception Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Motivational Interview
For those subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group, information from their MIHART assessment interview and medical record review will be used to select intervention scripts optimally tailored to each subjects' unique configuration of beliefs and risk factors and they will be re-contacted by telephone at 2-weeks post-hospital discharge to deliver the Vet-HART intervention. The intervention will be administered by a trained research assistant via telephone, working from a semi-structured script tailored to each subject's representations and risk factors, the call will last about 15-30 minutes.
6
Usual Care
For those randomly assigned to the usual care group, they will receive standard-of-care by their regular primary care provider.
6
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMotivational InterviewTotalUsual Care
Age, Continuous68.33 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98
67.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.05
65.67 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants12 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency Scale

Angina Frequency Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSeattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency Scale20.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.59
Usual CareSeattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency Scale16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.51
Primary

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Stability Scale

Angina Stability Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

Population: Note that because 4 participants in the Usual Care group reported that they did not experience chest pain in the prior four weeks, their responses could not be included in the analysis, as the scale measures changes in the severity of chest pain. Therefore, only 2 participants in the Usual Care group contributed to the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSeattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Stability Scale25.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 66.14
Usual CareSeattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Stability Scale-12.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
Primary

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Disease Perception Scale

Disease Perception Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSeattle Angina Questionnaire Disease Perception Scale13.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.62
Usual CareSeattle Angina Questionnaire Disease Perception Scale9.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.01
Primary

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Physical Limitations Scale

Physical Limitations Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSeattle Angina Questionnaire Physical Limitations Scale-5.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.98
Usual CareSeattle Angina Questionnaire Physical Limitations Scale3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.43
Primary

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Treatment Satisfaction Scale

Treatment Satisfaction Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSeattle Angina Questionnaire Treatment Satisfaction Scale-3.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.45
Usual CareSeattle Angina Questionnaire Treatment Satisfaction Scale7.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.95
Primary

SF-36v Emotional Well-Being Scale

Emotional Well-Being Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Emotional Well-Being Scale-14.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.86
Usual CareSF-36v Emotional Well-Being Scale-2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Primary

SF-36v Energy-Fatigue Scale

Energy-Fatigue Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Energy-Fatigue Scale-5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.65
Usual CareSF-36v Energy-Fatigue Scale1.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.49
Primary

SF-36v General Health Scale

General Health Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v General Health Scale-5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.03
Usual CareSF-36v General Health Scale4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.15
Primary

SF-36v Pain Scale

Pain Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Pain Scale-5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.23
Usual CareSF-36v Pain Scale14.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Primary

SF-36v Physical Function Scale

Physical Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

Population: Participants who completed the SF-36v at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Physical Function Scale-6.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.64
Usual CareSF-36v Physical Function Scale13.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.52
Primary

SF-36v Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale

Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale-27.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.46
Usual CareSF-36v Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale5.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.61
Primary

SF-36v Role Limitations Due to Physical Health Scale

Role Limitations Due to Physical Health Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Role Limitations Due to Physical Health Scale-22.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.54
Usual CareSF-36v Role Limitations Due to Physical Health Scale9.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.39
Primary

SF-36v Social Functioning Scale

Social Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months post hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational InterviewSF-36v Social Functioning Scale-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.18
Usual CareSF-36v Social Functioning Scale-10.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026