Skip to content

Bone Marrow Transplantation in Young Adults With Severe Sickle Cell Disease

A Phase II Study of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy for Young Adults With Severe Sickle Cell Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01565616
Acronym
STRIDE
Enrollment
22
Registered
2012-03-28
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2017-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

Severe Sickle Cell Disease, Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy, Bone Marrow Transplant, Hematologic Diseases, Genetic Diseases, Anemia, Hemolytic, Congenital, Human Leukocyte Antigen, HLA

Brief summary

This is a Phase II, single arm, multi-center trial. It is designed to estimate the efficacy and toxicity of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who have high risk features. The primary goal of this multi-center Phase II study is to determine the safety and feasibility of a conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan (Bu)/ fludarabine (Flu)/ anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in adult patients with severe SCD. A two-component design will be used for this study. The first component will be restricted to patients who have an HLA-identical sibling donor. Five patients will be transplanted during the first component of the study. If no more than 2 of the first 5 patients experience unacceptable toxicity, including death, within the first six months after transplantation, then the safety of the regimen will be considered promising in adult SCD patients. The second component will include patients who have a related or an unrelated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched donor. Up to 15 additional patients will be transplanted in this component of the study which will evaluate the safety and feasibility of unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in adults with SCD. Data related to study endpoints for 1 year after transplantation will be collected; however, participating centers will be encouraged to conduct long-term follow-up evaluations of patients according to standard institutional guidelines. The purpose of this pilot safety trial is to see if this approach is feasible and meets accrual goals lending support to the development of a subsequent full scale investigation of HCT and comparing outcomes in a transplantation cohort to a control cohort of adults eligible for, but unwilling or unable to receive HCT treated by supportive therapy with a primary endpoint of five years survival for this full scale comparative trial.

Detailed description

This is a Phase II, single arm, multi-center trial. It is designed to estimate the efficacy and toxicity of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who have high risk features. The primary goal of this multi-center Phase II study is to determine the safety and feasibility of a conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan (Bu)/ fludarabine (Flu)/ anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in adult patients with severe SCD. A two-component design will be used for this study. The first component will be restricted to patients who have an HLA-identical sibling donor. Five patients will be transplanted during the first component of the study. If no more than 2 of the first 5 patients experience unacceptable toxicity, including death, within the first six months after transplantation, then the safety of the regimen will be considered promising in adult SCD patients. The second component will include patients who have a related or an unrelated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched donor. Up to 15 additional patients will be transplanted in this component of the study which will evaluate the safety and feasibility of unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in adults with SCD. Data related to study endpoints for 1 year after transplantation will be collected; however, participating centers will be encouraged to conduct long-term follow-up evaluations of patients according to standard institutional guidelines. The purpose of this pilot safety trial is to see if this approach is feasible and meets accrual goals lending support to the development of a subsequent full scale investigation of HCT and comparing outcomes in a transplantation cohort to a control cohort of adults eligible for, but unwilling or unable to receive HCT treated by supportive therapy with a primary endpoint of five years survival for this full scale comparative trial. The primary objective is to determine event-free survival (EFS) at 1 year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using bone marrow in patients with sickle cell disease. Death, disease recurrence or graft rejection by 1 year will be considered events for this endpoint. Secondary objectives include determining the effect of HCT on clinical and laboratory manifestations of severe sickle cell disease and determining the incidence of other transplant-related outcomes.

Interventions

DRUGConditioning Regimen with Bone Marrow Transplant

The bone marrow transplant regimen is below. Day 0 is the day of the transplant. The - sign is the number of days before and the + sign is the number of days after the transplant. Day -8 BU 3.2 mg/ kg/dose IV Day -7 BU 3.2 mg/kg/dose IV, FLU 35mg/m2 IV Day -6 BU 3.2 mg/kg/dose IV, FLU 35mg/m2 IV, ATG 0.5mg/kg IV Day -5 BU 3.2 mg/kg/dose IV, FLU 35mg/m2 IV, ATG 1.0mg/kg IV Day -4 FLU 35mg/m2 IV, ATG 1.5mg/kg IV Day -3 FLU 35mg/m2 IV, ATG 1.5mg/kg IV Day -2 ATG 1.5mg/kg IV Day -1 Rest Day 0 Stem cell infusion Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Regimen Day -3 Calcineurin Inhibitor (Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus) therapeutic doses through day 180, then taper Day 0 Stem cell infusion Day +1 Methotrexate 7.5 mg/m2 IV Day +3 Methotrexate 7.5 mg/m2 IV Day +6 Methotrexate 7.5 mg/m2 IV Day+11 Methotrexate 7.5 mg/m2 IV

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of severe sickle cell disease and have one or more of the following: 1. Clinically significant neurologic event (stroke) or any neurological deficit lasting \> 24 hours 2. History of two or more episodes of acute chest syndrome (ACS) in the 2-year period preceding enrollment despite the institution of supportive care measures (i.e. asthma therapy and/or hydroxyurea). Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) is defined as new pulmonary alveolar consolidation (or infiltrate) involving at least one complete lung segment associated with acute symptoms including one or more of the following: fever ≥ 38.5 Celsius, chest pain, tachypnea per age adjusted normal, intercostal retractions/nasal flaring/use of accessory muscles of respiration, wheezing, rales or cough that is not attributed to asthma or bronchiolitis. 3. History of three or more severe pain crises per year in the 2-year period preceding enrollment despite the institution of supportive care measures (i.e. a pain management plan and/or treatment with hydroxyurea). Pain Crisis is defined as new onset of pain that last for at least 2 hours for which there is no other explanation (i.e. vaso-occlusive, priapism). 4. Administration of regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusion therapy, defined as receiving 8 or more transfusions per year for greater than or equal to 1 year to prevent vaso-occlusive clinical complications (i.e. pain, stroke, and acute chest syndrome) 5. Trans-thoracic echocardiograph evidence of tricuspid valve regurgitant jet (TRJ) velocity greater than or equal to 2.7 m/sec. * Adequate physical function as measured by: 1. Karnofsky performance score greater than or equal to 60 2. Cardiac function: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> 40%; or LV shortening fraction \> 26% by cardiac echocardiogram or by multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan. 3. Pulmonary function: Pulse oximetry with a baseline O2 saturation of greater than or equal to 85% and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \> 40% (corrected for hemoglobin) 4. Renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance \> 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 by radionuclide glomerular filtration rate (GFR); or GFR \> 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 by radionuclide GFR. 5. Hepatic function: Serum conjugated (direct) bilirubin \< 2x upper limit of normal for age as per local laboratory; and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 5 times upper limit of normal as per local laboratory. Patients whose hyperbilirubinemia is the result of hyperhemolysis, or a severe drop in hemoglobin post blood transfusion, are not excluded 6. If the patient has been receiving chronic transfusion therapy for greater than or equal to 1 year and has clinical evidence of iron overload by serum ferritin (mean of 3 ferritin levels \>1000 and chronic transfusions \>20 in a lifetime or MRI), evaluation by liver biopsy is required. Histological examination of the liver must document the absence of cirrhosis, bridging fibrosis and active hepatitis. The absence of bridging fibrosis will be determined using the histological grading and staging scale as described by Ishak and colleagues (1995). * Patients must have a related or unrelated bone marrow donor with HLA-matched at 8 of 8 HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 loci by allelic testing. Umbilical cord blood or peripheral blood stem cell donors will not be accepted.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with cirrhosis of the liver, uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection in the 6 weeks before enrollment, or seropositivity for HIV * Patients who have received prior HCT * Patients who within 3 months of enrollment have participated in another clinical trial in which the patient received an investigational drug or device or off-label use of a drug or device * Patients who demonstrate lack of compliance with prior medical care * Patients who are unwilling to use approved contraception for at least 6 months after transplant * Patients who have a history of substance abuse in the last 5 years that interferes with their care * Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding * Patients unable to provide consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event -Free Survival Rate1 year after transplantEvent-free survival is defined as stable donor erythropoiesis with no new clinical evidence of sickle cell disease. Primary or late graft rejection, disease recurrence, and death are considered events for this endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)1 year after transplantAcute GVHD was graded according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) consensus criteria. Clinical manifestations of acute GVHD include skin, liver, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Grading of acute GVHD is determined by size of maculopapular rash, bilirubin and stool output. Acute GVHD grades range from 0 to 4 with 0 indicating no GVHD and 4 representing the most severe grade. Grade II is defined as a maculopapular rash over 25-50% of body surface area (BSA), bilirubin of 3.1 to 6 mg/dL, and stool output of 1000-1500 mL/d (for adults). Grade III is defined as a maculopapular rash over more than 50% of BSA, bilirubin of 6.1 to 15 mg/dL, and stool output of greater than 1500 mL/d (for adults). Grade IV is defined as generalized erythroderma with bullous formation, bilirubin greater than 15 mg/dL, and severe abdominal pain with or without ileus.
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)1 year after transplantChronic GVHD was graded according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2014 Consensus Criteria Diagnosis and scoring the severity of chronic GVHD is determined by evaluating symptoms of the skin, nails, hair, mouth, eyes, genitalia, gastrointestinal tract, liver, lungs, muscles, fascia and joints, immune function as well as other symptoms such as ascites and neuropathy. Chronic GVHD is graded as mild, moderate or severe based on the number of organ sites impacted and the severity of symptoms.
Graft Failure1 year after transplantPrimary graft failure occurs when a transplant recipient does not achieve donor chimerism following a bone marrow transplant. Secondary graft failure occurs when graft fails after donor chimerism had initially occurred.
Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment1 year after transplantTime to neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first of 3 measurements on different days when the patient has an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500/µL after conditioning. Time to Platelet engraftment is defined as the first day of a minimum of 3 measurements on different days that the patient has achieved a platelet count \> 50,000/µL, without receiving a platelet transfusion in the previous 7 days.
Transplant Related Outcomes1 year after transplantCommon transplant related complications were monitored as a secondary outcome measure of this study. These transplant related complications include hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS), central nervous system (CNS) toxicity complications of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), hemorrhage, and seizures, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, adenovirus infection, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and invasive fungal infection.
Overall Survival1 year after transplantOverall survival is defined as survival with or without sickle cell disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from 8 study locations between March, 2012 and June, 2015.

Pre-assignment details

The first component of the study was restricted to 5 patients with a related donor. If no more than 2 of the first 5 patients experienced unacceptable toxicity within six months of transplantation then the safety of the regimen was considered promising and the study could include patients with a related or unrelated HLA matched donor.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients
Individuals receiving a bone marrow transplant at one of 10 study locations, between March 2012 and June, 2015.
22
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBone Marrow Transplant Recipients
Age, Customized
16-19 years of age
6 Participants
Age, Customized
20-24 years of age
8 Participants
Age, Customized
24-29 years of age
6 Participants
Age, Customized
30-40 years of age
2 Participants
Donor Relation
Related
17 Participants
Donor Relation
Unrelated
5 Participants
Indication of Severe Sickle Cell Disease
Acute chest syndrome
2 Participants
Indication of Severe Sickle Cell Disease
Elevated TRJ Velocity
4 Participants
Indication of Severe Sickle Cell Disease
Recurrent pain events
15 Participants
Indication of Severe Sickle Cell Disease
Regular RBC transfusion therapy
4 Participants
Indication of Severe Sickle Cell Disease
Significant neurological event (stroke)
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Event -Free Survival Rate

Event-free survival is defined as stable donor erythropoiesis with no new clinical evidence of sickle cell disease. Primary or late graft rejection, disease recurrence, and death are considered events for this endpoint.

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsEvent -Free Survival Rate19 Participants
Secondary

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Acute GVHD was graded according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) consensus criteria. Clinical manifestations of acute GVHD include skin, liver, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Grading of acute GVHD is determined by size of maculopapular rash, bilirubin and stool output. Acute GVHD grades range from 0 to 4 with 0 indicating no GVHD and 4 representing the most severe grade. Grade II is defined as a maculopapular rash over 25-50% of body surface area (BSA), bilirubin of 3.1 to 6 mg/dL, and stool output of 1000-1500 mL/d (for adults). Grade III is defined as a maculopapular rash over more than 50% of BSA, bilirubin of 6.1 to 15 mg/dL, and stool output of greater than 1500 mL/d (for adults). Grade IV is defined as generalized erythroderma with bullous formation, bilirubin greater than 15 mg/dL, and severe abdominal pain with or without ileus.

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsAcute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Grade II Acute GVHD3 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsAcute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Grade III Acute GVHD1 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsAcute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Grade IV Acute GVHD0 Participants
Secondary

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Chronic GVHD was graded according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2014 Consensus Criteria Diagnosis and scoring the severity of chronic GVHD is determined by evaluating symptoms of the skin, nails, hair, mouth, eyes, genitalia, gastrointestinal tract, liver, lungs, muscles, fascia and joints, immune function as well as other symptoms such as ascites and neuropathy. Chronic GVHD is graded as mild, moderate or severe based on the number of organ sites impacted and the severity of symptoms.

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsChronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Mild Chronic GVHD3 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsChronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Moderate Chronic GVHD2 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsChronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Severe Chronic GVHD1 Participants
Secondary

Graft Failure

Primary graft failure occurs when a transplant recipient does not achieve donor chimerism following a bone marrow transplant. Secondary graft failure occurs when graft fails after donor chimerism had initially occurred.

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsGraft FailurePrimary graft failure0 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsGraft FailureSecondary graft failure1 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as survival with or without sickle cell disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsOverall Survival20 Participants
Secondary

Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment

Time to neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first of 3 measurements on different days when the patient has an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500/µL after conditioning. Time to Platelet engraftment is defined as the first day of a minimum of 3 measurements on different days that the patient has achieved a platelet count \> 50,000/µL, without receiving a platelet transfusion in the previous 7 days.

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTime to Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentNeutrophil engraftment17 Days
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTime to Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentPlatelet21 Days
Secondary

Transplant Related Outcomes

Common transplant related complications were monitored as a secondary outcome measure of this study. These transplant related complications include hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS), central nervous system (CNS) toxicity complications of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), hemorrhage, and seizures, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, adenovirus infection, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and invasive fungal infection.

Time frame: 1 year after transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesHepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)0 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesIdiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome (IPS)1 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesPRES1 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesCentral Nervous System Toxicity: Hemorrhage1 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesCentral Nervous System Toxicity: Seizure1 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesCytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection11 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesAdenovirus Infection0 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesEpstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection4 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesPost-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease1 Participants
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsTransplant Related OutcomesInvasive Fungal Infection0 Participants
Post Hoc

PROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of Life

Health related quality of life was measured with the 57 item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-57). The PROMIS-57 includes 8 domains of health. The domains of Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference, Physical Function, Satisfaction with Social Role, and Sleep Disturbances each include 8 items. Respondents indicate the degree to which statements about specific health issues are problematic on a scale of 1 to 5 and responses are converted to a t-score metric. A score of 50 is the mean score for the general population in the United States, with a standard deviation of 10. Scores above 50 indicate the topic of the domain is being experienced more than average while scores below 50 mean that it is less than average. The domain of Pain Intensity is measured with a single item asking participants to rate their average pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The raw mean score is used.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year after transplant

Population: This outcome measure compared quality of life scores one year post-HCT to baseline in the 17 participants who completed the surveys.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeAnxiety domain score: baseline50.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeAnxiety domain score: 1 year48.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeDepression domain score: baseline44.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeDepresssion domain score: 1 year46.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeFatigue domain score: baseline48.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeFatigue domain score: 1 year46.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifePain interference domain score: baseline58.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifePain interference domain score: 1 year50.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifePhysical function domain score: baseline44.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifePhysical function domain score: 1 year50.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeSocial role satisfaction domain score: baseline51.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeSocial role satisfaction domain score: 1 year52.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeSleep disturbance domain score: baseline47.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifeSleep disturbance domain score: 1 year46.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifePain intensity domain score: baseline3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsPROMIS-57 Scores Health Related Quality of LifePain intensity domain score: 1 year2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the anxiety domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.52t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the depression domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.12t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the fatigue domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.54t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the pain interference domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.006t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the physical function domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.044t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the satisfaction with social role domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.85t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in t-scores of the sleep disturbances domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.88t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This statistical analysis is the paired difference in raw scores of the pain intensity domain of the PROMIS-57 quality of life scale. 16 participants with paired measurements of the PROMIS-57 survey (baseline and 1 year) are included in this analysis.p-value: 0.53t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026