Skip to content

A Phase 3 Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Participants With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib (MLN9708) Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01564537
Enrollment
722
Registered
2012-03-28
Start date
2012-08-01
Completion date
2022-02-08
Last updated
2023-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of oral ixazomib to the background therapy of lenalidomide and dexamethasone improves progression free survival (PFS) in participants with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called Ixazomib. Ixazomib is being tested to treat people who have relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study will look at progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety in participants who take ixazomib in addition to lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared to placebo in addition to lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The study enrolled 722 patients. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups-which will remain undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need): * Ixazomib 4 mg + lenalidomide + dexamethasone * Placebo (dummy inactive pill) - this is a tablet that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient + lenalidomide + dexamethasone All participants will receive treatment in 28 day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. This multi-center trial will be conducted worldwide. The overall time to participate in this study is approximately 80 months. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic, and will be contacted every 4 weeks for PFS and every 12 weeks for OS.

Interventions

DRUGIxazomib

Ixazomib capsules

DRUGLenalidomide

Lenalidomide capsules

DRUGDexamethasone

Dexamethasone tablets

DRUGPlacebo

Ixazomib placebo-matching capsules

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female participants 18 years of age or older. 2. Multiple myeloma diagnosed according to standard criteria either currently or at the time of initial diagnosis. NOTE: The initial diagnosis must have been symptomatic multiple myeloma, although the relapsed disease did not need to be symptomatic. 3. Must have had measurable disease, defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: * Serum M-protein ≥ 1 g/dL (≥ 10 g/L). * Urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg/24 hours. * Serum free light chain (FLC) assay: involved FLC level ≥ 10 mg/dL (≥ 100 mg/L), provided that the serum FLC ratio was abnormal. 4. Participants with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had received 1 to 3 prior therapies. NOTE: population included the following 3 categories of participants: * Participants who relapsed from their previous treatment(s) but were not refractory to any previous treatment. * Participants who were refractory to all lines of previous treatment(s) (ie, participants who had never responded to any therapies received). * Participants who relapsed from at least 1 previous treatment AND additionally were refractory to at least 1 previous treatment. For the purposes of this study, refractory disease was defined as disease progression on treatment or progression within 60 days after the last dose of a given therapy. A line of therapy was defined as 1 or more cycles of a planned treatment program. This may have consisted of 1 or more planned cycles of single-agent therapy or combination therapy, as well as a sequence of treatments administered in a planned manner. For example, a planned treatment approach of induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, followed by maintenance was considered 1 line of therapy. Autologous and allogenic transplants were permitted. 5. Must have met the following clinical laboratory criteria: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1000/mm\^3 and platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm\^3. Platelet transfusions to help participants meet eligibility criteria were not allowed within 3 days prior to randomization. * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN). * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 3 x ULN. * Calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min NOTE: Participants with a low creatinine clearance ≤ 60 mL/min (or ≤ 50 mL/min, according to lenalidomide prescribing information/local practice) were to receive a reduced lenalidomide dose of 10 mg once daily (QD) on Days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle. The lenalidomide dose may have been escalated to 15 mg QD after 2 cycles if the participant was not responding to treatment and was tolerating the treatment. If renal function normalized (ie, creatinine clearance \>60 mL/min or \>50 mL/min, according to lenalidomide prescribing information/local practice) and the participant continued to tolerate this treatment, lenalidomide may then have been escalated to 25 mg QD. 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2. 7. Participants who received prior allogenic transplant must have had no active graft-versus-host disease. 8. Female participants who: * Were postmenopausal for at least 24 months before the screening visit, OR * Were surgically sterile, OR * If they were of childbearing potential must have: had a negative pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 25 mIU/mL within 10 to 14 days and again within 24 hours prior to starting Cycle 1 of lenalidomide; either agreed to practice true abstinence, when this was in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. (Periodic abstinence \[eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods\] and withdrawal were not acceptable methods of contraception.) OR begun 2 reliable methods of birth control (1 highly effective method and 1 additional effective method) at the same time, at least 28 days before starting study treatment through 90 days after the last dose of study treatment; and agreed to ongoing pregnancy testing AND must have also adhered to the guidelines of the RevAssist program (US participants), RevAid program (Canadian participants), iAccess program (Australian participants), RevMate program (Japanese participants) or The Lenalidomide Pregnancy Risk Minimisation Plan as outlined in the Study Manual (all other participants who were not using commercial supplies). Male patients, even if surgically sterilized (ie, status postvasectomy), who: * Agreed to practice true abstinence, when this was in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. (Periodic abstinence \[eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods\] and withdrawal were not acceptable methods of contraception.) OR * Agreed to practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and 90 days after the last dose of study treatment if their partner was of childbearing potential, even if they had a successful vasectomy, AND * Must have also adhered to the guidelines of the RevAssist program (US participants), RevAid program (Canadian participants), iAccess program (Australian participants), RevMate program (Japanese participants) or The Lenalidomide Pregnancy Risk Minimisation Plan as outlined in the study Manual (all other participants who were not using commercial supplies) 9. Must have been able to take concurrent aspirin 81 to 325 mg daily (or enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously daily \[or its equivalent\] if allergic to aspirin), per published standard or institutional standard of care, as prophylactic anticoagulation. NOTE: For participants with prior history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was mandatory. 10. Voluntary written consent must have been given before performance of any study related procedure not part of standard medical care, with the understanding that consent may have been withdrawn by the participant at any time without prejudice to future medical care. 11. Was willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. Was refractory to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor-based therapy at any line. NOTE: Refractory disease was defined as disease progression on treatment or progression within 60 days after the last dose of a given therapy. Participants who progressed after 60 days from the last dose of a given therapy were considered relapsed and were eligible for inclusion in the study. Participants who were refractory to thalidomide-based therapy were eligible. 2. Female participants who were breast feeding or pregnant. 3. Failure to have fully recovered (ie, Grade 1 toxicity) from the effects of prior chemotherapy (except for alopecia) regardless of the interval since last treatment. 4. Major surgery within 14 days before randomization. 5. Radiotherapy within 14 days before randomization. 6. Central nervous system involvement. 7. Infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy or other serious infection within 14 days before randomization. 8. Diagnosis of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, plasma cell leukemia, primary amyloidosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative syndrome. 9. Evidence of current uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions, including uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction within 6 months before randomization in the study. 10. Systemic treatment with strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 (CYP1A2) (fluvoxamine, enoxacin, ciprofloxacin), strong inhibitors of CYP3A (clarithromycin, telithromycin, itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, posaconazole) or strong CYP3A inducers (rifampin, rifapentine, rifabutin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital), or use of Ginkgo biloba or St. John's wort within 14 days before randomization in the study. 11. Ongoing or active systemic infection, active hepatitis B or C virus infection, or known human immunodeficiency virus positive. 12. Comorbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens (eg, peripheral neuropathy that is Grade 1 with pain or Grade 2 or higher of any cause). 13. Psychiatric illness/social situation that would limit compliance with study requirements. 14. Known allergy to any of the study medications, their analogues, or excipients in the various formulations of any agent. 15. Inability to swallow oral medication, inability or unwillingness to comply with the drug administration requirements, or gastrointestinal condition that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of treatment. 16. Diagnosed or treated for another malignancy within 2 years before randomization or previously diagnosed with another malignancy and any evidence of residual disease. Participants with nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of any type were not excluded if they had undergone complete resection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase \> 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \> 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17).
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \< 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Duration of Response (DOR)Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 monthsDOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR \[including sCR\] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria.
Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 monthsEastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.
Overall Survival (OS)From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning.
OS in High-Risk ParticipantsFrom the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants.
PFS in High-Risk ParticipantsFrom date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis.
Plasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibPre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)
Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by PolymorphismDay 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain ResponseBaseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now \[current pain\]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst).

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 187 sites in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom and US from 01 August 2012 to 08 February 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups: Ixazomib 4 mg or Ixazomib placebo-matching tablets in combination with lenalidomide, and dexamethasone.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once, on Days 1, 8 and 15; plus lenalidomide 25 mg, orally, once, on Days 1 through 21; and dexamethasone 40 mg, orally, once, on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle for multiple cycles until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first up to EOT (up to approximately 42.9 months).
360
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Ixazomib placebo-matching capsules, orally, once, on Days 1, 8 and 15; plus lenalidomide 25 mg, orally, once, on Days 1 through 21; and dexamethasone 40 mg, orally, once, on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle for multiple cycles until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 41 months).
362
Total722

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up73
Overall StudyReason not specified8182
Overall StudySite Terminated by Sponsor10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1214

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneTotalIxazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Age, Continuous65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.13
Age, Customized
>65-≤75 years
125 participants270 participants145 participants
Age, Customized
≤65 years
176 participants344 participants168 participants
Age, Customized
>75 years
61 participants108 participants47 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska native
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
34 participants64 participants30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 participants13 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
12 participants21 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
333 participants674 participants341 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
13 participants18 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
15 participants23 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants7 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
303 participants615 participants312 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
8 participants17 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
4 participants9 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
7 participants14 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
26 participants45 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
China
3 participants6 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
21 participants36 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
7 participants17 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
45 participants81 participants36 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
7 participants15 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
21 participants39 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
14 participants33 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
15 participants39 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
21 participants41 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
2 participants6 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
6 participants9 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
39 participants67 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
20 participants41 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
8 participants15 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
6 participants12 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
18 participants39 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
4 participants6 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
14 participants30 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
12 participants27 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
3 participants7 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 participants20 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants51 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
160 Participants313 Participants153 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
202 Participants409 Participants207 Participants
Stratification Factor: International Staging System (ISS) Stag at Screening
Stage III
44 participants90 participants46 participants
Stratification Factor: International Staging System (ISS) Stag at Screening
Stage I or Stage II
318 participants632 participants314 participants
Stratification Factor: Lines of Prior Therapy
1 Line
213 participants425 participants212 participants
Stratification Factor: Lines of Prior Therapy
2 or 3 Lines
149 participants297 participants148 participants
Stratification Factor: Proteasome Inhibitor
Exposed
253 participants503 participants250 participants
Stratification Factor: Proteasome Inhibitor
Naïve
109 participants219 participants110 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
250 / 361251 / 359
other
Total, other adverse events
350 / 361342 / 359
serious
Total, serious adverse events
205 / 361202 / 359

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase \> 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \> 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed.

Time frame: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Population: ITT population was defined as all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)20.6 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)14.7 months
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [0.587, 0.939]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting: EOT3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.85
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Social Functioning: EOT-6.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.44
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Fatigue: Baseline38.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.98
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning: EOT-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Role Functioning: Baseline68.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.75
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Dyspnea: Baseline21.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.74
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Fatigue: EOT6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.38
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Dyspnea: EOT5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.04
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Social Functioning: Baseline77.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.07
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning: Baseline75.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.47
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Pain: EOT2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.65
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Role Functioning: EOT-8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.27
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss: EOT4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.49
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Insomnia: Baseline27.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.04
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Pain: Baseline38.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Constipation: Baseline12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.58
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Insomnia: EOT0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.41
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Constipation: EOT-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.57
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning: Baseline81.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.42
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning: Baseline70.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.74
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss: Baseline16.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Diarrhea: Baseline6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.38
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting: Baseline5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.89
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Diarrhea: EOT17.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.08
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Financial Difficulties: Baseline16.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.15
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Global Health Index: Baseline58.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Global Health Index: End of Treatment-6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Financial Difficulties: EOT0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.69
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning: EOT-4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.61
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning: EOT-7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.61
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Social Functioning: EOT-7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.37
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Social Functioning: Last Follow-up0.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Social Functioning: Baseline75.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.47
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss: EOT6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.47
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss: Last Follow-up0.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Constipation: Baseline13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Constipation: EOT2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.05
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Constipation: Last Follow-up33.3 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Pain: Last Follow-up0.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Diarrhea: Baseline8.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.49
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Diarrhea: EOT10.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.53
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Diarrhea: Last Follow-up0.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Financial Difficulties: Baseline18.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Financial Difficulties: EOT1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.54
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Global Health Index: Baseline56.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.12
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Financial Difficulties: Last Follow-up-33.3 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Global Health Index: End of Treatment-6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.85
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Global Health Index: Last Follow-up16.7 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning: Baseline67.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.54
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning: EOT-6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.36
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Role Functioning: EOT-8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Role Functioning: Last Follow-up-16.7 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning: Last Follow-up-25.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning: Baseline81.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Fatigue: Baseline39.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.14
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Fatigue: EOT6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.61
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Fatigue: Last Follow-up22.2 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Pain: Baseline38.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.99
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Pain: EOT3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.07
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting: Baseline6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.31
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting: EOT0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.22
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting: Last Follow-up33.3 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Dyspnea: Baseline23.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.68
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Dyspnea: EOT2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.33
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Dyspnea: Last Follow-up0.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Insomnia: Baseline30.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.59
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Insomnia: EOT-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.26
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Insomnia: Last Follow-up33.3 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss: Baseline15.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.21
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning: Last Follow-up0.0 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Role Functioning: Baseline64.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.24
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning: Baseline75.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.22
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning: EOT-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.16
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning: EOT-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.24
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning: Last Follow-up-50.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Disease Symptoms: Baseline29.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.85
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Body Image: Baseline78.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.259
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Disease Symptoms: EOT-2.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.752
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Future Perspective: EOT2.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Disease Symptoms: Last Follow-up1.11 score on a scale
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Side Effects of Treatment: Baseline17.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.289
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Body Image: EOT-0.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.102
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Side Effects of Treatment: EOT4.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.435
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Future Perspective: Baseline56.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.17
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Side Effects of Treatment: Baseline17.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.682
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Side Effects of Treatment: Last Follow-up37.04 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Side Effects of Treatment: EOT4.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.955
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Body Image: Baseline79.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.233
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Body Image: EOT-5.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.368
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Body Image: Last Follow-up-33.3 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Future Perspective: Baseline60.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.064
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Future Perspective: EOT-2.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.842
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Future Perspective: Last Follow-up-11.11 score on a scale
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Disease Symptoms: Baseline30.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.072
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)Disease Symptoms: EOT-2.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.372
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR \[including sCR\] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 months

Population: Response-Evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline response assessment. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)26.0 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)21.7 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.

Time frame: From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 months

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug, regardless of their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs359 Participants
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs205 Participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs357 Participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs201 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain Response

Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now \[current pain\]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst).

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain ResponseBaseline345 Participants
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain ResponseEOT145 Participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain ResponseEOT153 Participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain ResponseBaseline351 Participants
Secondary

OS in High-Risk Participants

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants.

Time frame: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOS in High-Risk Participants46.9 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOS in High-Risk Participants30.9 months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism

Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available with data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism80.3 percentage of participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism75.7 percentage of participants
p-value: =0.33295% CI: [0.69, 2.45]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC78.3 percentage of participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC71.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17).

Time frame: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Population: ITT population was defined as all randomized participants. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]42.2 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]29.4 months
p-value: =0.76495% CI: [0.516, 1.626]Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive.

Time frame: From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)

Population: ITT population was defined as all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Survival (OS)53.6 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Survival (OS)51.6 months
p-value: =0.49595% CI: [0.784, 1.125]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC

Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \< 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC48.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC39.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

PFS in High-Risk Participants

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis.

Time frame: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Population: Participants from the ITT population, all randomized participants, with cytogenic abnormalities. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePFS in High-Risk Participants18.7 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePFS in High-Risk Participants9.3 months
Secondary

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

Time frame: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Population: Safety population is defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of any study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 14.79 μg/mL
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-Dose36.3 μg/mLStandard Deviation 31.3
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-Dose15.6 μg/mLStandard Deviation 11.1
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-Dose6.83 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.5
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.4 μg/mLStandard Deviation 2.4
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-Dose7.12 μg/mLStandard Deviation 8.44
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.48 μg/mLStandard Deviation 1.69
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.41 μg/mLStandard Deviation 1.35
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.42 μg/mLStandard Deviation 1.49
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.57 μg/mLStandard Deviation 3.89
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.71 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.79
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.37 μg/mLStandard Deviation 1.47
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.51 μg/mLStandard Deviation 2.13
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose2.82 μg/mLStandard Deviation 5.98
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Concentration Over Time for IxazomibCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-Dose0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneTime to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC22.4 months
Placebo + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneTime to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC17.6 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026