Skip to content

DWI in Assessing Treatment Response in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging Biomarkers for Assessment of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Sub-study of the I-SPY 2 TRIAL (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging And MoLecular Analysis)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01564368
Acronym
ACRIN6698
Enrollment
406
Registered
2012-03-27
Start date
2012-08-27
Completion date
2020-01-14
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer, HER2-negative breast cancer, HER2-positive breast cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Imaging procedures, such as diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), may help in evaluating how well patients with breast cancer respond to treatment. PURPOSE: This research trial studies DWI and DCE-MRI in assessing treatment response in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine if the change in tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measured from each treatment timepoint to baseline is predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary * To determine if the combined measurement of change in tumor ADC value, change in tumor volume, and change in peak signal-enhancement ratio (SER) is predictive of pCR. * To investigate the relative effectiveness of the individual measurements, change in tumor ADC value, change in tumor volume, and change in peak SER for predicting pCR in experimental treatment arms. * To assess the test-retest reproducibility of ADC metrics applied to breast tumors. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients undergo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) at baseline, after week 3 of neoadjuvant paclitaxel regimen, and prior to and after completion of 4 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients then undergo surgery. Patients undergo DWI prior to contrast administration for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). After completion of treatment procedure, patients are followed up for 5 years on the I-SPY 2 TRIAL.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging examination and subsequent radiologist interpretation

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
American College of Radiology Imaging Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Meets I-SPY 2 TRIAL inclusion criteria * High-risk for recurrent disease PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Able to tolerate imaging required by protocol PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * Not specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)SurgeryPathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as the lack of all signs of cancer in tissue samples removed during surgery after Neoadjuvant treatment for Breast cancer. ie., no residual invasive disease in either breast or axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (ypT0/is, ypN0) Histopathologic analysis was performed using the Residual Cancer Burden system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine the Accuracy of Predictive Models Including Covariates for Combined Measurement of Change in Tumor ADC Value, Change in Tumor Volume, and Other Variablesbaseline and mid-treatmentAccuracy will be measured as the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) Predictive logistic regression modeling was performed in 207 patients with complete mid-treatment ΔADC and ΔFTV data. To build prediction models with ADC and other variables, a data-splitting approach was used where a randomly selected 60% of participants (124 patients), stratified according to pCR status and tumor subtype, were selected as the training data set and the rest (86 patients) as the test set. Logistic regression with backward variable selection was used to construct the prediction models, which were then applied to the remaining 40% of the data to obtain predictive scores for each participant.
Repeatability Coefficient (RC)Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumorsbaseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)within-subject standard deviation (wSD) Repeatability coefficient (RC): \[RC = 2.77\*wSD\] (units: 10E-3 mm/sec\^2) Smaller values of RC, bounded \[0, ...), represent agreement
Functional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)SurgeryPathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as the lack of all signs of cancer in tissue samples removed during surgery after Neoadjuvant treatment for Breast cancer. ie., no residual invasive disease in either breast or axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (ypT0/is, ypN0) Histopathologic analysis was performed using the Residual Cancer Burden system Functional tumor volume (FTV) (units cm3) was computed by summing all tumor voxels meeting specific enhancement criteria, with customized thresholds for each site to account for variability in MR imaging systems
ICC Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumorsbaseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)Test and retest DWI measurements for a given patient were performed on the same day in a single imaging session. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is derived from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) model estimates (Barnhart,Haber, Lin 2007), Larger values of ICC (bounded \[-1,1\]) represent agreement
Agreement Index (AI) Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumorsbaseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)Test and retest DWI measurements for a given patient were performed on the same day in a single imaging session. Agreement index (AI): (Zhang, Wang, Duan - 2014) is based on the data's overall ranking. AI confidence intervals were obtained via bootstrap method Larger values AI (bounded \[0.5,1\]) represent agreement
Within-subject Coefficient of Variation (wCV) Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumorsbaseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)within-subject standard deviation (wSD) Within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV): \[wCV = 100%\*wSD/mean\] Smaller values of wCV bounded for \[0,...) represent better agreement

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diffusion Weighted-MRI
Participants on all arms of the I-SPY II trial with both a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) scan at baseline and 1 post-baseline timepoint (early-treatment, mid-treatment, or post-treatment). The experimental component/intervention is whether DW-MRI can predict therapeutic response in women receiving neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer.
242
Total242

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyBaseline Imaging failed QC requirements9
Overall StudyIneligible18
Overall StudyNo Acceptable post-baseline imaging21
Overall StudyNot Randomized in Parent study116

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDiffusion Weighted-MRI
Age, Continuous48.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
154 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
65 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
173 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
242 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 406
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 406
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 406

Outcome results

Primary

Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as the lack of all signs of cancer in tissue samples removed during surgery after Neoadjuvant treatment for Breast cancer. ie., no residual invasive disease in either breast or axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (ypT0/is, ypN0) Histopathologic analysis was performed using the Residual Cancer Burden system

Time frame: Surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Early Treatment ChangePathologic Complete Response (pCR)Pathological Complete Responders (pCR)71 Participants
Early Treatment ChangePathologic Complete Response (pCR)Non-Responders(pCR-)156 Participants
Mid-Treatment ChangePathologic Complete Response (pCR)Pathological Complete Responders (pCR)70 Participants
Mid-Treatment ChangePathologic Complete Response (pCR)Non-Responders(pCR-)140 Participants
Post-Treatment ChangePathologic Complete Response (pCR)Pathological Complete Responders (pCR)63 Participants
Post-Treatment ChangePathologic Complete Response (pCR)Non-Responders(pCR-)123 Participants
Comparison: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC), were estimated for the change in Apparent Diffusion Coefficients (ADC1 - ADC0)/ADC0 (Test: %change in ADC; Reference: pCR) detect a difference of 0.15 between the AUC under H0: AUC=0.5 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.65. It was assumed that the number of pCR non-responders would be approximately 2.7 times greater than the number of complete respondersp-value: 0.484Z-test
Comparison: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC), were estimated for the change in Apparent Diffusion Coefficients (ADC2 - ADC0)/ADC0 (Test: %change in ADC; Reference: pCR) detect a difference of 0.15 between the AUC under H0: AUC=0.5 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.65. It was assumed that the number of pCR non-responders would be approximately 2.7 times greater than the number of complete respondersp-value: 0.017Z-test
Comparison: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC), were estimated for the change in Apparent Diffusion Coefficients (ADC3 - ADC0)/ADC0 (Test: %change in ADC; Reference: pCR) detect a difference of 0.15 between the AUC under H0: AUC=0.5 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.65. It was assumed that the number of pCR non-responders would be approximately 2.7 times greater than the number of complete respondersp-value: 0.013Z-test
Secondary

Agreement Index (AI) Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors

Test and retest DWI measurements for a given patient were performed on the same day in a single imaging session. Agreement index (AI): (Zhang, Wang, Duan - 2014) is based on the data's overall ranking. AI confidence intervals were obtained via bootstrap method Larger values AI (bounded \[0.5,1\]) represent agreement

Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early Treatment ChangeAgreement Index (AI) Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors0.83 probability
Secondary

Determine the Accuracy of Predictive Models Including Covariates for Combined Measurement of Change in Tumor ADC Value, Change in Tumor Volume, and Other Variables

Accuracy will be measured as the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) Predictive logistic regression modeling was performed in 207 patients with complete mid-treatment ΔADC and ΔFTV data. To build prediction models with ADC and other variables, a data-splitting approach was used where a randomly selected 60% of participants (124 patients), stratified according to pCR status and tumor subtype, were selected as the training data set and the rest (86 patients) as the test set. Logistic regression with backward variable selection was used to construct the prediction models, which were then applied to the remaining 40% of the data to obtain predictive scores for each participant.

Time frame: baseline and mid-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early Treatment ChangeDetermine the Accuracy of Predictive Models Including Covariates for Combined Measurement of Change in Tumor ADC Value, Change in Tumor Volume, and Other Variables0.71 probability
Mid-Treatment ChangeDetermine the Accuracy of Predictive Models Including Covariates for Combined Measurement of Change in Tumor ADC Value, Change in Tumor Volume, and Other Variables0.72 probability
Post-Treatment ChangeDetermine the Accuracy of Predictive Models Including Covariates for Combined Measurement of Change in Tumor ADC Value, Change in Tumor Volume, and Other Variables0.57 probability
Comparison: AUC (optimized) = AUC (ΔADC)p-value: 0.032z-test
Secondary

Functional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as the lack of all signs of cancer in tissue samples removed during surgery after Neoadjuvant treatment for Breast cancer. ie., no residual invasive disease in either breast or axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (ypT0/is, ypN0) Histopathologic analysis was performed using the Residual Cancer Burden system Functional tumor volume (FTV) (units cm3) was computed by summing all tumor voxels meeting specific enhancement criteria, with customized thresholds for each site to account for variability in MR imaging systems

Time frame: Surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Early Treatment ChangeFunctional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)Pathological Complete Responders (pCR)71 Participants
Early Treatment ChangeFunctional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)Non-Responders(pCR-)156 Participants
Mid-Treatment ChangeFunctional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)Pathological Complete Responders (pCR)70 Participants
Mid-Treatment ChangeFunctional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)Non-Responders(pCR-)140 Participants
Post-Treatment ChangeFunctional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)Pathological Complete Responders (pCR)63 Participants
Post-Treatment ChangeFunctional Tumor Volume (FTV) as a Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)Non-Responders(pCR-)123 Participants
Comparison: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC), were estimated for the change in functional tumor volumes (FTV1 - FTV0)/FTV0 (Test: %change in FTV; Reference: pCR) detect a difference of 0.15 between the AUC under H0: AUC=0.5 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.65. It was assumed that the number of pCR non-responders would be approximately 2.7 times greater than the number of complete respondersp-value: <0.001Z-test
Comparison: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC), were estimated for the change in functional tumor volumes (FTV2 - FTV0)/FTV0 (Test: %change in FTV; Reference: pCR) detect a difference of 0.15 between the AUC under H0: AUC=0.5 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.65. It was assumed that the number of pCR non-responders would be approximately 2.7 times greater than the number of complete respondersp-value: <0.001Z-test
Comparison: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC), were estimated for the change in functional tumor volumes (FTV3 - FTV0)/FTV0 (Test: %change in FTV; Reference: pCR) detect a difference of 0.15 between the AUC under H0: AUC=0.5 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.65. It was assumed that the number of pCR non-responders would be approximately 2.7 times greater than the number of complete respondersp-value: <0.001Z-test
Secondary

ICC Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors

Test and retest DWI measurements for a given patient were performed on the same day in a single imaging session. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is derived from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) model estimates (Barnhart,Haber, Lin 2007), Larger values of ICC (bounded \[-1,1\]) represent agreement

Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early Treatment ChangeICC Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors0.97 correlation coefficient
Secondary

Repeatability Coefficient (RC)Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors

within-subject standard deviation (wSD) Repeatability coefficient (RC): \[RC = 2.77\*wSD\] (units: 10E-3 mm/sec\^2) Smaller values of RC, bounded \[0, ...), represent agreement

Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early Treatment ChangeRepeatability Coefficient (RC)Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors0.16 10E-3 mm/sec^2
Secondary

Within-subject Coefficient of Variation (wCV) Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors

within-subject standard deviation (wSD) Within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV): \[wCV = 100%\*wSD/mean\] Smaller values of wCV bounded for \[0,...) represent better agreement

Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment) or after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment (early-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early Treatment ChangeWithin-subject Coefficient of Variation (wCV) Test-retest Metric for Reproducibility of ADC as Applied to Breast Tumors4.8 coefficient of variation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026