Skip to content

Quantitative Heat Loss With Laminar Air Flow

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01564212
Enrollment
10
Registered
2012-03-27
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2017-02-23
Last updated
2018-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

heat loss, laminar airflow, operating rooms

Brief summary

With approval of the IRB at the Cleveland Clinic and written informed consent, the investigators propose to study up to 20 healthy volunteers in the protocol below as this will allow for drop-outs. As the investigators believe that 10 volunteers will provide sufficient power to detect clinically-meaningful differences between laminar air flow treatments. The study has been designed to find out whether heat loss increases significantly in laminar air flow operating rooms. Furthermore the investigators will find out whether active warming minimizes this heat loss. Increased heat loss increases the amount of perioperative hypothermia. It has been shown that perioperative hypothermia is associated with severe complications such as an increased incidence of surgical wound infections. On the other hand laminar air flow is explicitly used to decrease air-borne infections. Our study results will help to optimize thermal management of orthopedic patients.

Interventions

OTHERstandard airflow with forced air warming.

Subjects will lie on operating room bed with standard airflow and forced air warming.

OTHERlaminar airflow with surgical drapes
OTHERlaminar airflow with forced air warming

Subjects will lie on operating room bed with laminar airflow and forced air warming.

OTHERstandard airflow with surgical drapes

Subjects will lie on operating room bed with standard airflow on and surgical drapes surrounding bed.

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 45 years of age * Healthy male and female volunteers * ASA physical status I * Capable and willing to provide written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
heat loss20 minutesDefining the within-volunteer difference in heat flux between laminar air flow 'on' and laminar air flow 'off' as the primary outcome of interest, we will use two linear regression models to perform analyses, respectively, for active warming and no active warming settings. Ambient temperature and relative humidity will be adjusted for within this linear model if they are not adequately balanced between the four experimental scenarios, on average (as determined by standard univariable summary statistics).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026