Skip to content

Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia With Remifentanil Infusion for Labour

Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia With Remifentanil Infusion for Labour: is Demand Bolus Required for Optimal Analgesia

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01563939
Enrollment
2
Registered
2012-03-27
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Labour analgesia, Pregnancy, IVPCA

Brief summary

Epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor may not be suitable for all patients, and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with opioids offers the best alternative. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of two methods remifentanil administration in the form of either an infusion or PCA demand bolus (intravenous injection of a single dose over a short period of time). Currently, our hospital gives remifentanil by demand bolus, however it may be equally effective, with less side effects, to give the drug as an infusion.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted as a randomized trial with two arms: Group I- continuous infusion of remifentanil with stepwise increase in infusion rates and Group II- demand bolus only with stepwise increase in bolus dose, as per the patient's analgesic requirement. Visual analog scores will be the primary outcome. Maternal and fetal side effects will be recorded. The results of this study will determine the regimen that suits the patients needs for painless labor with high efficacy, less adverse effects and a higher patient satisfaction.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil

Remifentanil IV for continuous infusion: 0.025mcg/kg/min, increased by 0.025mcg/kg/min every 15 min if patient is not satisfied, to a maximum of 0.15mcg/kg/min. Remifentanil IV for demand bolus: 0.2 mcg/kg, lockout 2 min, incrementally increased if patient is not satisfied by 0.2 mcg/kg to a maximum of 1.2 mcg/kg.

Sponsors

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Term pregnancy in labour with singleton fetus in cephalic presentation * Patients requesting systemic analgesia * Patients with contraindication for regional anesthesia without fetal compromise (coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, refusal, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to sign written informed consent * Inability to communicate in English * Opioid dependence or addiction * Patients on Methadone * Allergy or hypersensitivity to remifentanil * Fetal heart rate abnormalities * Fetal congenital anomalies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain score24 hoursVerbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS) from 0 to 10 (where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain felt), approximately every hour, throughout labour.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maternal satisfaction24 hoursMaternal satisfaction rated from 0-10, throughout labour
Consumption of remifentanil24 hoursremifentanil consumed in mg/hr
Crossover to epidural24 hoursTime to crossover if the patient decides to have an epidural
Side effects24 hoursSedation score, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, Nausea, Vomiting, Pruritis
Fetal & Neonatal outcomes48 hoursNon-reassuring fetal heart rate as determined by obstetrician, Neonatal weight, Apgar scores, naloxone administration, need for resuscitation, NICU admission.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026