Skip to content

Ruxolitinib in Patients With Breast Cancer

Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Patients With PSTAT3+ Breast Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01562873
Enrollment
21
Registered
2012-03-26
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2017-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

pSTAT3+

Brief summary

Ruxolitinib is a drug which blocks the Janus tyrosine Kinase (JAK) signaling pathway. It is thought that this pathway might be important in certain types of breast cancer, and that blocking this pathway might lead to anti-cancer effects. This study is testing the effects of ruxolitinib in patients with breast cancer.

Detailed description

Objectives: Primary * The primary objective of this two-stage, phase II study is to estimate the objective response rate to ruxolitinib in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer which is pStat3+ and which has progressed on at least one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease, and/or has recurred within 12 months of completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary * To describe the toxicity profile * To evaluate clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD \>/= 24 weeks) * To estimate progression-free and overall survival Exploratory * To explore whether baseline hs-CRP level higher than the group median is associated with objective response * To explore whether baseline IL-6 level higher than the group median is associated with objective response * To describe hs-CRP level over time, and to describe the proportion of patients with a) hs-CRP \> 3mg/L at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression, and b) hs-CRP \> 1mg/L at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression * To describe IL-6 level over time, and to describe the proportion of patients with IL-6 level above the upper limit of normal at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression * To describe pStat3 status by IHC in baseline metastatic biopsies * To describe pStat3 status by IHC in on-study biopsies * To describe pStat3 status by IHC in the time of progression biopsy samples * To characterize archival and metastatic biopsy samples using triple immunofluorescence for CD44, CD24, and pStat3 * To characterize archival and metastatic biopsy samples using a previously characterized pStat3 gene signature * To characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for CD44, CD24, and pStat3 at baseline and time of progression

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

Sponsors

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive breast cancer * Must have known ER, PR and HER2 status * Either, Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer or * Inflammatory Breast Cancer with any ER, PR HER2 status * Availability of archival tissue specimen suitable for pStat3 testing * Life expectancy of greater than 3 months * Measurable disease by RECIST * At least one prior chemotherapy regimen for treatment of metastatic breast cancer and/or recurrence within 12 months of completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or * For patients with inflammatory breast cancer but no distant metastases, progression through standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy is required

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding * Active brain metastases * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to ruxolitinib * Clinically significant malabsorption syndrome * Concurrent use of medications/substances that are strong inhibitors of CY3A4 * No uncontrolled intercurrent illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response RateDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Benefit RateDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for 24 weeks or longer based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions (smallest sum LD reference), new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD) is defined as any condition not meeting the above criteria. SD needed to be a minimum 24 weeks in duration.
Overall SurvivalIn long-term follow-up, patients were followed for survival every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.
Progression-Free SurvivalDisease was evaluated radiologically every 8 weeks on treatment through 12 cycles and in long-term follow-up every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or equivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients enrolled from October 2012 through June 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Patients must have had sufficient archival specimen for central pStat3 testing to be eligible.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ruxolitinib-Cohort A
Patients received Ruxolitinib 25 mg twice daily for up to 12 cycles (cycle duration=28 days) until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled sequentially into two possible cohorts based on pStat3+ expression score by central testing: Cohort A - moderate to high positive status defined as a score of \>/=5 by central testing or Cohort B - low positive status defined as a score of 3-4. Each cohort was evaluated with a 2 stage design. Cohort B only opened if 2 objective responses were observed in 1st stage Cohort A patients (n=21).
21
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyClinical Disease Progression90
Overall StudyClinical PD and adverse event10
Overall StudyDisease Progression per RECIST100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRuxolitinib-Cohort A
Age, Continuous51 years
Gender
Female
21 Participants
Gender
Male
0 Participants
pStat3 Positive Status
low positive
0 participants
pStat3 Positive Status
moderate to high positive
21 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate

The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised all enrolled patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ruxolitinib-Cohort AObjective Response Rate0.0 proportion of patients
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for 24 weeks or longer based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions (smallest sum LD reference), new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD) is defined as any condition not meeting the above criteria. SD needed to be a minimum 24 weeks in duration.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised all enrolled patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ruxolitinib-Cohort AClinical Benefit Rate0.0 proportion of patients
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.

Time frame: In long-term follow-up, patients were followed for survival every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised all enrolled patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ruxolitinib-Cohort AOverall Survival4.5 months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or equivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically every 8 weeks on treatment through 12 cycles and in long-term follow-up every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised all enrolled patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ruxolitinib-Cohort AProgression-Free Survival1.2 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026