Skip to content

A Clinical Trial of Pronation Versus Supination Maneuvers for the Reduction of the Pulled Elbow

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Pronation Versus Supination Maneuvers for the Reduction of the Pulled Elbow

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01562535
Enrollment
90
Registered
2012-03-26
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2012-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nursemaid Elbow, Pulled Elbow

Keywords

pulled elbow, nursemaid elbow

Brief summary

Nursemaid elbow or pulled elbow is a condition commonly seen in the emergency department. It is the sudden pull of the radial head (a bone in the elbow) in toddlers. Usually occur when a parent tries to pull the child by the arm and a clic or clunk is felt with immediate pain and unwilling to move the arm. It is not a dangerous condition although it is distressing for kids and their parents/caretakers.

Detailed description

The usual therapy consists of one of two maneuvers: supination maneuver or pronation maneuver. They both are safe to perform but none of them have been statistically superior over the other. More studies are needed to confirm or discard the tendency of the studies to favor the pronation maneuver. The investigators intend to perform a randomized trial evaluating which of these techniques is better than the other in terms of returning the mobility of the affected arm and decreasing pain.

Interventions

OTHERPronation

In this technique the arm is flexed 90 degrees and a gentle pronation is applied to the arm; then the arm is further flexed to 45 degrees until the clinician feels a click in the elbow meaning the re-accommodation of the radial head has been accomplished.

OTHERSupination

The affected arm is in a 90 degrees flexion. The clinician will hold the arm by the elbow and then makes a gentle supination of the affected arm and flexion of the elbow until feeling the click and the child is able to move the arm without pain.

Sponsors

Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pulled elbow suspected in any child presenting one of the following: 1. History of an adult or bigger person that had pulled the child's elbow non-intentionally 2. Presence of intense pain at the arrival at the emergency department and unwilling to move the arm.

Exclusion criteria

* Any suspect of injury that could be intentional (child abuse) * Any suspicion child of suffering a possible fracture (the mechanism of the injury was not from pulling the child's arm, the arm presents obvious deformity, ecchymoses, edema, etc.) * The mechanism was from multiple trauma * Any chronic disease affecting the adequate bone mineralization (vitamin D deficiency, osteogenesis, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful reduction10 to 20 minutes✦ Patient can move his/her arm without pain in the next 20 minutes after the technique is applied: i.e., the mother asks the child to hold an object (toy) and the toddler can hold it without problem.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain of the procedure1 to 5 minThe mother will asses after the protocol is completed the perceived pain on her child from the maneuver. This will be assessed in a Likert scale.

Countries

Mexico

Contacts

Primary ContactCarlos A Cuello-Garcia, MD
carlos.cuello@itesm.mx+52(81)-81430200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026