Skip to content

Research Study to Compare the Addition of Topaz Micro Debridement to the Standard of Care Surgery

A Randomised, Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Investigation on the Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Micro Debridement, Topaz, in Recalcitrant Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) vs. Standard of Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01562366
Enrollment
66
Registered
2012-03-23
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2017-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome, Hip Pain Chronic

Keywords

Iliotibial Band Release, Trochanteric Bursectomy, Micro debridement

Brief summary

Compare the surgical use of Topaz with the Standard Of Care in the treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (a type of hip pain). The hypothesis is that there is a difference between the two treatment groups.

Interventions

DEVICETopaz

Radiofrequency micro debridement with Topaz will be used to treat the gluteal tendons following standard of care procedure

PROCEDUREIliotibial band release and trochanteric bursectomy

Standard of Care: An iliotibial band release and trochanteric bursectomy will be performed.

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female or male aged between 40-70 years old, females and males are eligible 2. A history of \> 6 months of conservative care treatment for lateral hip pain, including but not limited to local anaesthetic and steroid injections into the trochanteric bursa 3. Pre-operative MRI and ultrasound with evidence of GTPS within the previous 24 weeks 4. Willing to comply with the protocol and follow-up visits 5. Signed the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous surgery to the hip such as hip replacement, fracture neck of femur fixation, or repair of gluteal tendons 2. Subjects with sero-positive or sero-negative arthropathy 3. Long term steroid use \> 6 weeks 4. Allergy to drugs to be used in the procedure 5. Medical co-morbidities that preclude surgical intervention 6. Inability to understand or respond to the study questionnaires 7. Females who are pregnant, or pregnancy is suspected or planned within the clinical investigation timeframe 8. Subjects who are simultaneously participating in another device or pharmaceutical investigation Intra-operative Exclusion: 1. Abductor tears 2. Severe tendinopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Harris Hip Score6 monthsThis is a patient questionnaire used to evaluate hip function following surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale1 yearThis is a patient questionnaire designed to evaluate pain.
SF-12 Health Survey1 yearThis is a patient questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index1 yearThis is a patient questionnaire used to evaluate rheumatic symptoms, stiffness, pain and how it affects the ability to function.
Ultrasound findings1 year
Adverse events1 year
Duration of surgery between two treatment groups1 dayThe total length (time) of surgery will be compared between the two groups.

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026