Skip to content

Differential Effect of Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin on Stone Clearance After Extra-corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Differential Effect of Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin on Stone Clearance After ESWL

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01560091
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-03-22
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2017-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stones

Keywords

clearance rate

Brief summary

Tamsulosin is an alpha blocker usually prescribed for urinary complaints that has been shown to have some benefit in allowing kidney stones to pass through the ureter. Silodosin is a new alpha blocker that acts more rapidly than tamsulosin and has been shown to have specific receptors on the ureter. The investigators would like to see if there is some benefit to taking silodosin over tamsulosin after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) to break kidney stones in terms of allowing the ureteral fragments to pass through the ureter. Our hypothesis is that silodosin will be at least as effective as tamsulosin in terms of allowing stones to pass, but may allow them to pass more quickly because of the rapid onset of action. The side effect profile for both drugs is quite similar and tolerable. Patients may experience some common side effects associated with tamsulosin, including abnormal ejaculation, dizziness, rhinitis (runny nose, sneezing), and somnolence (sleepiness). Serious reactions include orthostatic hypotension, syncope (fainting), and priapism (prolonged undesired erection). Patients may experience some common side effects with both silodosin and tamsulosin including ejaculatory dysfunction, dizziness, postural hypotension, diarrhea, and headache. Serious side effects are rare and include orthostatic hypotension, intra-operative floppy iris syndrome, syncope, and priapism. Patients will experience the discomfort normally associated with kidney stones. All efforts will be made to alleviate these discomforts, including the use of the study medications. Patients will be able to take their routine prescribed pain medications, and will be asked to keep a record of their pain medication use. The investigators will be randomly enrolling patients from all racial backgrounds and of both genders. They must have kidney stones ranging in size from 4mm to 1.0 cm and have no prior treatment for the study. The primary endpoint of this study is the clearance rate of kidney stones. That is, in what period of time does the patient achieve clearance, is stone free and has all residual stones gone. The secondary endpoints of this study include analgesic use, residual stones remaining, need for re-treatment, need for intervention, steinstrasse clearance, and the need for hospitalization.

Detailed description

A comparison between two commonly used alpha blockers to determine if there is superiority in the secondary usage of aiding in stone passage

Interventions

DRUGTamsulosin

Tamsulosin 0.4mg PO Qday

DRUGsilodosin

8mg PO Qday

PROCEDUREExtra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy

ESWL

Sponsors

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults age 18 to 70 * Non-diabetics * White blood cell count and serum creatinine level within normal range * Urine analysis consistent with absence of infection * Negative urine culture * Absence of subjective or objective fever * Ability to tolerate oral fluids and pain medication * Unilateral ureteral calculus \< 10mm visible on CT scan within the ureter * Ability to make informed medical decisions regarding consent * Willingness to follow up in the urology office

Exclusion criteria

Adults unable to consent * Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) * Pregnant women * Prisoners * Prior treatment for this particular stone * Medical therapy only for stone disease * Chronic narcotic use * Current alpha blocker therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clearance rate of kidney stones (days)1 yearThe primary endpoint of this study is the clearance rate of kidney stones. That is, in what period of time does the patient achieve clearance, is stone free and has all residual stones gone. This outcome measure will be measured in days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual stones remaining1 yearResidual stones remaining, based on imaging
need for re-treatment1 yearneed for re-treatment. Either the patient will need another ESWL, or hospitilization
Analgesic use1 yearAnalgesic use, number of pills of pain medication
steinstrasse clearance1 yearsteinstrasse clearance. Whether or not stone clearance is achieved or not
need for hospitalization1 yearneed for hospitalization. either yes or no
need for intervention1 yearneed for intervention. Either ESWL again or hospitilization and further procedures such as laser lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open surgery

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026