Skip to content

Egg Protein Hydrolysate and Vascular Function

The Effect of Egg Protein Hydrolysate on Arterial Stiffness in Overweight or Moderately Obese Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Diabetes Type 2

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01559896
Enrollment
40
Registered
2012-03-21
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2014-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arterial Stiffness, Dietary Modification, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

egg protein hydrolysate

Brief summary

The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rapidly growing. Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of developing long term micro- and macrovascular complications. Subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) show increased blood glucose levels after an oral glucose load. These subjects have a markedly increased risk of later T2DM development. T2DM development can be prevented or delayed by lifestyle modifications. To support lifestyle changes and reduce the risk of T2DM development, foods containing functional ingredients are being developed. An interesting functional ingredient is protein hydrolysate. An egg protein hydrolysate has been experimentally shown to improve endothelial function, to inhibit plasma angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and to reduce blood pressure in rats. Egg protein hydrolysate could thus be a interesting ingredient to treat the cardiovascular dysfunction associated with T2DM. In the present study, the effects of egg protein hydrolysate will be evaluated in subjects with overweight or moderate obesity and IGT or T2DM.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTprotein hydrolysate capsules and placebo capsules

Once in the study, 20 subjects will be randomly assigned to a group taking capsules containing 5 gr egg protein hydrolysate per day, and 20 to a group taking placebo capsules. The subjects consume the capsules during three consecutive days (period 1). Following a wash-out period of minimally four weeks, the treatments are crossed-over.

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 18 and 70 years; * male and female; * Body Mass Index (BMI) between 25-35 kg/m2; * Diagnosed T2DM (subjects are allowed to use oral antidiabetics and/or to be on a diabetes diet) or impaired glucose tolerance (defined as blood glucose \> 7.8 mmol/l and \< 11.0 mmol/L, two hours after ingesting 75 gram glucose in 150 ml water)

Exclusion criteria

* known allergy to (chicken) egg proteins; * active cardiovascular diseases like congestive heart failure or recent (\< 6 months) event (acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular incident); * severe medical conditions related to the intestine that might interfere with the study such as inflammatory bowel disease and celiac disease; * the use of insulin; * the use of medication such as antihypertensives, statins or drugs that change gastric motility or emptying; * abuse of drugs or alcohol (\> 21 units per week); * pregnant or breast-feeding women; * current smoker; * having donated blood at the blood bank within a period of 8 weeks prior to the start of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The change (baseline vs 2 hours, and baseline vs 2 days) in arterial stiffness measured as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocitybaseline vs 2 hours, baseline vs 2 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in glucose and insulin concentrations and calculated HOMA-index, incretins, lipids, characteristics of the microcirculation, and non-invasively assessed upper-arm blood pressure and central aortic systolic blood pressure and heart rate changesbaseline vs 2 hours, and baseline vs 2 days

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026