Cerebrovascular Disorders, Deglutition Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke, Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Nurse Screening
Brief summary
Stroke is a major medical problem in the United States, and veterans are at significant risk given that the most critical risk factors of stroke, older age and associated medical problems such as high blood pressure, are common. Dysphagia, swallowing problems, can lead to aspiration which in turn may result increased pneumonia, particularly in stroke patients. Development and implementation of an accurate and consistent nursing swallowing screening tool to identify risk of aspiration in individuals admitted with suspected stroke is critical as it allows for immediate intervention, thereby reducing associated medical complications, length of stay, and healthcare costs. The availability of such screening tools, however, is limited. The primary objective of this study is to construct a reliable and valid swallowing screening tool to identify risk of aspiration in individuals admitted with suspected stroke.
Detailed description
Early detection of aspiration risk in acute stroke is critical as it allows for immediate intervention, thereby reducing mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalization, and healthcare costs. Screening of swallowing prior to the administration of food, liquid or medication, including aspirin, in individuals presenting with stroke symptoms is a guideline American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. In accordance with this guideline, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has advocated the screening of swallowing be a quality performance measure in acute stroke. Moreover, the Office of the Inspector General recently issued VHA Directive 2006-032 mandating that the initial nurse assessment must include a screening of swallowing. In response to the directive, many VHA facilities created and implemented some version of a nursing swallowing screening tool (SST), but to our knowledge, none have been validated using an instrumental swallowing examination nor has reliability been established. In developing and establishing a valid and reproducible SST for patients with stroke, clinicians are divided on the need to include trial water swallows as part of the SST. The current notion is that administering trial swallows by disciplines without expertise in dysphagia would compromise patient safety, thus this step is opposed by many speech pathologists and nurses. The prudency of introducing non-validated, non-reproducible SSTs is questionable. The primary objective of this study is to construct a reliable and valid SST to identify risk of aspiration in individuals admitted with suspected stroke. The specific aims of this proposal are to: 1) determine if nurses can make reliable inter-rater judgments of swallowing and non-swallowing features historically used by speech pathologists to make judgments of aspiration, and 2) identify the combination of items that provide the highest level of both sensitivity and specificity in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke. Outcomes of this research will inform as to the execution of a multi-site feasibility study on the implementation of a reliable and valid SST by nurses Methods: Consecutive individuals admitted with suspected stroke (N = 270) will be recruited to participate. Individuals will undergo screening of swallowing and a VFSS. Screening items selected for validation in the identification of risk of aspiration in patients presenting with stroke symptoms were based on extensive literature review using Cochrane and QUADAS guidelines. Eight screening items will be tested for validity and inter-rater reliability: 6 non-swallowing features and 2 swallowing features. Reliability in nursing observations of each screening item will be completed in all participants. Speech pathologists will serve as the reference standard from which to compare reliability with registered nurses who routinely work on the hospital ward with stroke patients.
Interventions
Consecutive individuals admitted with suspected stroke will be recruited to participate. Individuals will undergo screening of swallowing and a videofluoroscopic swallow study within two hours. Eight screening items will be tested for validity and inter-rater reliability: 6 nonswallowing features and 2 swallowing features. Reliability in nursing observations of each screening item will be completed in all participants. Speech pathologists trained in the screening items will serve as the reference standard from which to compare reliability with registered nurses who routinely work on the hospital ward with stroke patients
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male and female Veterans of all ethnicities admitted to MEDVAMC with a new suspected ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke will be eligible to participate. * Individuals with a history of prior strokes without dysphagia will be eligible to participate. * Patients must be medically stable as determined by the attending neurologist. * Participants with language or cognitive deficits who are judged by the attending neurologist to not have capacity to provide informed consent will be eligible to participate but they must have an authorized representative available within 24 hours of admission to provide consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals with a history of neurological disease other than stroke, head and neck structural surgery, or history of dysphagia unrelated to the current stroke will be excluded from participation. * Individuals who are obtunded (unable to maintain wakefulness), currently diagnosed with pneumonia, or on ventilator support will be excluded. * Veterans who are more than 72 hours past MEDVAMC admission will be excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of Screening Items | 3 years | Identify the combination of screenings items that provide the highest level of sensitivity in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke. |
| Specificity of Screening Items | 3 years | Identify the combination of screenings items that provide the highest level of specificity in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke. |
| Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | 3 years | Identify the combination of screenings items that provide the highest level of negative predictive value in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Average Accuracy Rate for Nurse Administration for All Screening Procedures | 3 years | Determine if current stroke-ward staff nurses can accurately administer screening items. |
| Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | 3 years | Determine if stroke-ward staff nurses can make reliable inter-rater judgments of swallowing (e.g. cough after swallow, wet voice after swallow) and nonswallowing features (e.g. decreased volitional cough, dysarthria) historically used by SLPs to make judgments of aspiration. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Chart review-1042 suspected stroke patients . Excluded-636 (h/o neuro disease, etc). Eligible-406. 137-declined, d/c before approaching. Consented-269. Screening completed-258 (11-unable to complete screening-d/c, unstable, etc). VFSS completed-256-250 analyzed (6 excluded from analysis-equipment failure, h/o dysphagia, etc.). RNs-15 participated.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Suspected Stroke Veterans admitted to MEDVAMC with a suspected ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. | 250 |
| Nurses Registered nurses working on MEDVAMC stroke wards | 15 |
| Total | 265 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Suspected Stroke | Total | Nurses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 | NA years | NA years |
| Discharge Diagnosis Imaging-confirmed stroke | 140 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Discharge Diagnosis Nonstroke/TIA | 45 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Discharge Diagnosis Physician-confirmed stroke | 16 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Discharge Diagnosis Physician-confirmed TIA | 49 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score | 2.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 | NA units on a scale | NA units on a scale |
| Previous History of Stroke | 60 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American | 120 participants | 123 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 participants | 6 participants | 6 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 32 participants | 37 participants | 5 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 98 participants | 99 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 250 participants | 265 participants | 15 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 20 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 243 Participants | 245 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Stroke Location bilateral | 4 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Stroke Location left hemispheric damage | 50 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Stroke Location posterior circulation | 35 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Stroke Location right hemispheric damage | 51 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Stroke Type Hemorrhagic | 3 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
| Stroke Type Ischemic | 137 participants | NA participants | NA participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 250 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 250 |
Outcome results
Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items
Identify the combination of screenings items that provide the highest level of negative predictive value in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Nurses were not assessed for this outcome measure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Age >70 | 91.0 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Lethargy | 88.7 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Dysarthria | 94.2 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Nonswallow wet voice | 89.3 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Abnormal volitional cough | 91.0 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Combined water swallow itmes | 94.3 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Dysarthria or Water swallow item | 96.5 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Negative Predictive Value of Screening Items | Age >70 or Dysarthria or Water swallow item | 97.9 percentage of agreement |
Sensitivity of Screening Items
Identify the combination of screenings items that provide the highest level of sensitivity in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Nurses were not assessed for this outcome measure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Age >70 | 37.9 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Lethargy | 3.5 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Dysarthria | 62.1 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Nonswallow wet voice | 10.3 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Abnormal volitional cough | 27.6 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Combined water swallow items | 72.4 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Dysarthria or Water swallow item | 86.2 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Sensitivity of Screening Items | Age >70 or Dysarthria or Water swallow item | 93.1 percentage of agreement |
Specificity of Screening Items
Identify the combination of screenings items that provide the highest level of specificity in the identification of aspiration risk as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in individuals admitted with suspected stroke.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Nurses were not assessed for this outcome measure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Age >70 | 82.8 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Lethargy | 99.5 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Dysarthria | 80.5 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Nonswallow wet voice | 98.6 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Abnormal volitional cough | 95.9 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Combined water swallow item | 59.7 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Dysarthria or Water swallow item | 49.3 percentage of agreement |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Specificity of Screening Items | Age >70 or Dysarthria or Water swallow item | 43.0 percentage of agreement |
Average Accuracy Rate for Nurse Administration for All Screening Procedures
Determine if current stroke-ward staff nurses can accurately administer screening items.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Average Accuracy Rate for Nurse Administration for All Screening Procedures | 98.33 percentage of accuracy |
Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items
Determine if stroke-ward staff nurses can make reliable inter-rater judgments of swallowing (e.g. cough after swallow, wet voice after swallow) and nonswallowing features (e.g. decreased volitional cough, dysarthria) historically used by SLPs to make judgments of aspiration.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Lethargy | 0.394 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Dysarthria | 0.717 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Abnormal volitional cough | 0.645 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Nonswallow wet voice | 0.360 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Cough after swallowing | 0.911 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Throat clear after swallowing | 0.837 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Wet voice after swallowing | 0.727 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | Inability to continuously drink 90ml of water | 0.911 kappa |
| Patients With Suspected Stroke | Reliability of Nurse Interpretation of Each Screening Items and the Valid Combination of Items | 1 minute wet voice | 1.000 kappa |